重慶市大學(xué)城本科生學(xué)情研究
[Abstract]:With the popularization of higher education in China, the quality of higher education has been paid more and more attention. How to improve the quality of undergraduate education, the key lies in the understanding of undergraduate learning. Based on the questionnaire of Xiamen University's "investigation and Research Group of National College students' Learning situation", this study compiles the questionnaire of undergraduate students' academic situation in Chongqing University Town as an investigation tool. This paper investigates and studies the learning situation of undergraduates in Chongqing University Town, analyzes the problems existing in the learning process of undergraduates in Chongqing University City, and looks for effective ways to improve the learning quality of undergraduates. In order to improve the quality of undergraduate education to provide reference. The results show that most of the undergraduates in Chongqing University Town hold the concept of applied knowledge learning, but some of them still hold the concept of memory knowledge learning. In the classroom experience, most undergraduate students' perception and experience of college classroom is positive, the average score of teaching method and teaching organization is high, but the main problem is the lack of communication between teachers and students. In terms of learning style, the average score of deep learning style is higher than that of surface learning style, which indicates that undergraduates are more inclined to use deep learning style, but there are also differences among different grades, majors and colleges and universities. In terms of learning harvest, the average score of undergraduates in Chongqing University Town is higher, and the overall bias is positive. According to the results of the investigation and index analysis of the undergraduate students in Chongqing University Town, the author suggests that we should change the students' learning ideas and learning methods, improve the teaching ideas and teaching methods of college teachers, reshape the harmonious relationship between teachers and students, and improve the relationship between teachers and students. Optimize the teaching evaluation system in colleges and universities. Only in this way can the quality of undergraduate education be improved.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:重慶師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:G642.4
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 吳小明;;高校教學(xué)理念的更新探索[J];廣東教育(教研版);2008年03期
2 殷文偉;;當(dāng)代大學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)動(dòng)機(jī)的一個(gè)實(shí)證研究[J];高教論壇;2006年06期
3 錢海燕;肖志國(guó);陳侃;丁妍;;師生對(duì)“教學(xué)優(yōu)點(diǎn)”的不同定義——基于復(fù)旦大學(xué)問卷調(diào)查的分析[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2012年04期
4 陸根書;;課堂學(xué)習(xí)環(huán)境、學(xué)習(xí)方式與大學(xué)生發(fā)展[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2012年04期
5 李志峰;賈勇宏;;課程、課堂、學(xué)生:提高高校教學(xué)質(zhì)量的著力點(diǎn)——基于高等教育微觀質(zhì)量要素認(rèn)同度的實(shí)證研究[J];大學(xué)(學(xué)術(shù)版);2012年05期
6 楊凌燕;郭建鵬;史秋衡;;我國(guó)大學(xué)生課堂體驗(yàn)及其影響因素的多層線性模型分析[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2013年06期
7 陳侃;丁妍;王穎;;研究型教學(xué)的行為分析——基于復(fù)旦大學(xué)的課堂教學(xué)觀察[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2012年04期
8 韋啟良;梅貽琦:所謂大學(xué)者,非謂有大樓之謂也,有大師之謂也——大學(xué)校長(zhǎng)列傳之二[J];河池學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期
9 張楚廷;;大學(xué)里,什么是一堂好課[J];高等教育研究;2007年03期
10 付八軍;馮曉玲;;高校教師教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)研究綜述[J];黑龍江高教研究;2008年04期
本文編號(hào):2433975
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/2433975.html