【摘要】：教育資源開放共享已經(jīng)成為了一個(gè)日益增長(zhǎng)的國(guó)際現(xiàn)象，也是高等教育機(jī)構(gòu)推動(dòng)教育信息化深入發(fā)展，實(shí)現(xiàn)教育革新的戰(zhàn)略選擇。作為系統(tǒng)實(shí)施的大規(guī)模教育資源開放共享項(xiàng)目，美國(guó)麻省理工學(xué)院開放課件運(yùn)動(dòng)是開放教育資源運(yùn)動(dòng)的開拓者和帶動(dòng)者，其成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)值得我國(guó)國(guó)家精品課程借鑒。遠(yuǎn)程教育與傳統(tǒng)教育最大的區(qū)別就是教師和學(xué)生處在時(shí)間和空間的分離狀態(tài)。這就使遠(yuǎn)程教育中教師和學(xué)生，學(xué)生與教材產(chǎn)生交互距離。因此在開放課程中最重要的就是要盡量的縮短交互距離。因此本研究選取了開放教育資源運(yùn)動(dòng)中國(guó)內(nèi)外的兩個(gè)代表，分別是麻省理工學(xué)院的開放課件項(xiàng)目和我國(guó)的國(guó)家精品課程建設(shè)項(xiàng)目為研究對(duì)象，對(duì)兩者進(jìn)行交互距離的分析比較，總結(jié)各自的優(yōu)劣勢(shì)，進(jìn)而給出對(duì)我國(guó)精品課程建設(shè)提出一些建議。 本研究以文獻(xiàn)研究法、比較研究法等方法作為主要的研究方法。首先對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外開放課程的研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行介紹。通過(guò)對(duì)穆爾交互影響距離理論的分析研究，總結(jié)出影響交互距離的五個(gè)因素，分別是個(gè)人和小組的教育思想、教育觀念和組織思想；學(xué)生和教師的個(gè)性和情感特征；課程的學(xué)科性質(zhì)和內(nèi)容；教育機(jī)構(gòu)的硬性規(guī)定和限制和環(huán)境因素和所選擇的通信媒體。然后通過(guò)對(duì)目前文獻(xiàn)的分析和對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外開放課程的研究分析比較國(guó)家精品課程和麻省理工學(xué)院的開放課程兩個(gè)項(xiàng)目就影響交互距離的五個(gè)因素進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析.最后在獲得比較結(jié)論的基礎(chǔ)上提出了對(duì)于我國(guó)國(guó)家精品課程建設(shè)項(xiàng)目的進(jìn)一步思考。提出了我國(guó)的國(guó)家精品課程建設(shè)項(xiàng)目需要秉持開放共享的教育觀念，，減輕教師的負(fù)擔(dān)，提高課程的發(fā)布效率；重視過(guò)程性評(píng)價(jià)；擴(kuò)展資源，促進(jìn)學(xué)生的更好理解；增加多種交互媒體；給學(xué)生提供更多的交互平臺(tái)。
[Abstract]:The opening and sharing of educational resources has become a growing international phenomenon. It is also a strategic choice for higher education institutions to promote the further development of educational information and to realize educational innovation. As a large-scale educational resource opening and sharing project, the MIT Open Courseware Movement is the pioneer and the driving force of the Open Education Resources Movement, and its successful experience is worthy of reference by our country's national fine courses. The biggest difference between distance education and traditional education is that teachers and students are separated in time and space. This makes the distance between teachers and students, students and textbooks in distance education. Therefore, the most important thing in the open course is to shorten the interaction distance as far as possible. Therefore, this study selects two representatives from inside and outside of the open education resource movement, namely, the open courseware project of MIT and the national fine course construction project of our country, to analyze and compare the interactive distance between the two. This paper summarizes their advantages and disadvantages, and puts forward some suggestions on the construction of fine courses in China. In this study, literature research, comparative research and other methods as the main research methods. First of all, the research status of open courses at home and abroad is introduced. Through the analysis and study of Moore's theory of interaction distance, five factors influencing the distance are summarized, which are individual and group educational thought, educational concept and organization thought, students' and teachers' personality and affective characteristics, and so on. The subject nature and content of the course, the mandatory rules and limitations of educational institutions and environmental factors and the communication media of choice. Then, through the analysis of the current literature and the research of open courses at home and abroad, the author makes a comparative analysis of the five factors that affect the interaction distance between the national quality courses and the open courses of Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Finally, on the basis of the comparative conclusion, the author puts forward the further thinking about the construction project of national fine course in our country. It is pointed out that the national excellent curriculum construction project in our country should uphold the educational concept of opening and sharing, lighten the burden of teachers, improve the efficiency of course release, attach importance to process evaluation, expand resources and promote students' better understanding. Add a variety of interactive media; provide students with more interactive platforms.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：G649.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳勁新;;我國(guó)國(guó)家精品課程網(wǎng)絡(luò)資源微觀建設(shè)之研究——美國(guó)MITOCW項(xiàng)目建設(shè)的啟示[J];成才之路;2008年28期

2 李樺;;MIT的開放式課程建設(shè)及其啟示[J];重慶廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

3 肖君;網(wǎng)上教學(xué)資源支持服務(wù)系統(tǒng)的建設(shè)[J];中國(guó)遠(yuǎn)程教育;2003年05期

4 肖新發(fā);網(wǎng)絡(luò)教育的模式建構(gòu)[J];中國(guó)遠(yuǎn)程教育;2003年13期

5 艾倫·泰特,陳壟;開放和遠(yuǎn)程教育中學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)支持之理念與模式[J];中國(guó)遠(yuǎn)程教育;2003年15期

6 嚴(yán)繼昌;思考資源建設(shè)[J];中國(guó)遠(yuǎn)程教育;2003年18期

7 王龍;麻省理工學(xué)院開放課件項(xiàng)目執(zhí)行報(bào)告概要及評(píng)述[J];中國(guó)遠(yuǎn)程教育;2005年08期

8 王龍;;創(chuàng)新推廣理論視角下的麻省理工學(xué)院開放課件項(xiàng)目[J];中國(guó)遠(yuǎn)程教育;2008年01期

9 王愛華;汪瓊;;精品課程與國(guó)外開放課程共享利用的對(duì)比研究[J];中國(guó)遠(yuǎn)程教育;2010年06期

10 吳中江;我國(guó)現(xiàn)代遠(yuǎn)程教育信息傳遞模式研究[J];電化教育研究;2002年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 湯益芳;美國(guó)高校整合網(wǎng)絡(luò)教學(xué)資源模式研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2005年

2 王龍;中國(guó)高等教育精品課程資源共建共享的現(xiàn)狀、問題、對(duì)策與相關(guān)分析[D];首都師范大學(xué);2006年

3 田甜;遠(yuǎn)程開放教育中藝術(shù)設(shè)計(jì)專業(yè)教學(xué)模式研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2007年

4 吳美嬌;國(guó)家精品課程與MIT OCW開放教育資源比較研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2388808