比較視域下的大學社會評價模式的研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-20 12:07
【摘要】：隨著中國高等教育的不斷發(fā)展，分級管理教育體制的建立使多元辦學主體格局形成和教育行政部門將越來越多的辦學權下放，因此高等教育質(zhì)量的評價形成了以政府評價、學校自評和社會評價共同進行的多元評價的整體，我國的政府評價和高校自評在長期的高等教育質(zhì)量保障過程中已經(jīng)發(fā)展的較為成熟，而社會對于大學的評價卻起步很晚且較慢。隨著社會對高等教育質(zhì)量越來越多的關注，社會群體意識到高等教育是直接為自我服務的，，自身有權利及義務對高等教育的質(zhì)量進行評價，因此大學社會評價也是在這樣的條件下產(chǎn)生的。 縱觀國內(nèi)外大學社會評價的現(xiàn)狀可以發(fā)現(xiàn)，我國的大學社會評價存在嚴重的不足，其中根本的問題是評價模式的問題。正因為模式的研究是具有深遠意義的，而現(xiàn)階段對于大學社會評價模式的研究又相對較少，因此只有對大學社會評價的模式進行深入的探討，才能找到問題的根源和解決問題的方法。 本文正是基于對大學社會評價模式問題的關注，首先從模式論著手進行分析，將現(xiàn)有的國內(nèi)外大學社會評價模式分為三類，分別是：認證評價模式、排名評價模式及評議評價模式，通過對三類大學社會評價模式運行要素的分析，總結出各類評價模式的特點。其次，選取美國、英國和日本這三個發(fā)達國家，通過對它們大學社會評價模式的研究，總結出各國大學社會評價模式的優(yōu)缺點及共同特點，之所以選取這三個國家是因為它們的大學社會評價模式發(fā)展的比較完善且有各自的特色值得我國借鑒。之后，對我國現(xiàn)有的排名評價模式和評議評價模式的現(xiàn)狀進行分析，找出我國大學社會評價模式存在的不足及產(chǎn)生的原因，最后根據(jù)本文的研究總結出符合我國國情的大學社會評價模式應當是怎樣的，并對如何去構建這樣的模式提出相應的對策，希望通過本人的研究能夠對我國大學社會評價的發(fā)展有所裨益。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of higher education in China, the establishment of the hierarchical management education system has made the pluralistic main body of running a school and the educational administrative department devolving more and more power to run a school. Therefore, the evaluation of the quality of higher education has been evaluated by the government. The multivariate evaluation of school self-evaluation and social evaluation, the government evaluation and university self-evaluation in our country have developed more mature in the long-term higher education quality assurance process. The social evaluation of universities started late and slowly. As the society pays more and more attention to the quality of higher education, social groups realize that higher education serves themselves directly and has the right and duty to evaluate the quality of higher education. Therefore, the university social evaluation is also produced under such conditions. Looking at the present situation of university social evaluation at home and abroad, it can be found that there are serious deficiencies in university social evaluation in our country, among which the fundamental problem is the evaluation model. Just because the research of the model is of far-reaching significance, the research on the social evaluation model of the university is relatively few at present, so it is only to carry on the thorough discussion to the model of the university social evaluation. In order to find the root of the problem and the solution to the problem. This paper is based on the concern of the university social evaluation model, first of all, from the mode theory to analyze, the existing domestic and foreign university social evaluation model is divided into three categories, respectively: certification evaluation model, By analyzing the operating elements of the three kinds of university social evaluation models, the characteristics of each kind of evaluation models are summarized. Secondly, three developed countries, the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan, are selected to sum up the advantages and disadvantages and common characteristics of their university social evaluation models through the research of their university social evaluation models. The reason for choosing these three countries is that their university social evaluation model is more perfect and has its own characteristics to be used for reference by our country. After that, this paper analyzes the status quo of the rank evaluation model and the evaluation model in China, and finds out the shortcomings and causes of the social evaluation model in our country. Finally, according to the research of this paper, the author summarizes how the university social evaluation model should be in line with the national conditions of our country, and puts forward the corresponding countermeasures on how to construct such a model. It is hoped that my research will benefit the development of university social evaluation in China.
【學位授予單位】：長沙理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G647
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of higher education in China, the establishment of the hierarchical management education system has made the pluralistic main body of running a school and the educational administrative department devolving more and more power to run a school. Therefore, the evaluation of the quality of higher education has been evaluated by the government. The multivariate evaluation of school self-evaluation and social evaluation, the government evaluation and university self-evaluation in our country have developed more mature in the long-term higher education quality assurance process. The social evaluation of universities started late and slowly. As the society pays more and more attention to the quality of higher education, social groups realize that higher education serves themselves directly and has the right and duty to evaluate the quality of higher education. Therefore, the university social evaluation is also produced under such conditions. Looking at the present situation of university social evaluation at home and abroad, it can be found that there are serious deficiencies in university social evaluation in our country, among which the fundamental problem is the evaluation model. Just because the research of the model is of far-reaching significance, the research on the social evaluation model of the university is relatively few at present, so it is only to carry on the thorough discussion to the model of the university social evaluation. In order to find the root of the problem and the solution to the problem. This paper is based on the concern of the university social evaluation model, first of all, from the mode theory to analyze, the existing domestic and foreign university social evaluation model is divided into three categories, respectively: certification evaluation model, By analyzing the operating elements of the three kinds of university social evaluation models, the characteristics of each kind of evaluation models are summarized. Secondly, three developed countries, the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan, are selected to sum up the advantages and disadvantages and common characteristics of their university social evaluation models through the research of their university social evaluation models. The reason for choosing these three countries is that their university social evaluation model is more perfect and has its own characteristics to be used for reference by our country. After that, this paper analyzes the status quo of the rank evaluation model and the evaluation model in China, and finds out the shortcomings and causes of the social evaluation model in our country. Finally, according to the research of this paper, the author summarizes how the university social evaluation model should be in line with the national conditions of our country, and puts forward the corresponding countermeasures on how to construct such a model. It is hoped that my research will benefit the development of university social evaluation in China.
【學位授予單位】：長沙理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G647
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 李守福;論大學的社會評價[J];比較教育研究;2003年05期
2 楊鳳英;毛祖桓;;美國高等教育中介組織的功能及其啟示[J];比較教育研究;2006年01期
3 蔣家瓊;姚利民;游柱然;;英國高等教育外部質(zhì)量保障組織體系及啟示[J];比較教育研究;2010年01期
4 崔艷麗;;《泰晤士報高等教育》大學排行評價方法的改變[J];大學(學術版);2010年09期
5 黃鴻鴻;大學社會評價勢在必行[J];福州師專學報;2001年04期
6 韓芳;李維U
本文編號：2283131
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/2283131.html
最近更新
教材專著
