【摘要】：隨著中國高等教育的不斷發(fā)展，分級管理教育體制的建立使多元辦學(xué)主體格局形成和教育行政部門將越來越多的辦學(xué)權(quán)下放，因此高等教育質(zhì)量的評價(jià)形成了以政府評價(jià)、學(xué)校自評和社會評價(jià)共同進(jìn)行的多元評價(jià)的整體，我國的政府評價(jià)和高校自評在長期的高等教育質(zhì)量保障過程中已經(jīng)發(fā)展的較為成熟，而社會對于大學(xué)的評價(jià)卻起步很晚且較慢。隨著社會對高等教育質(zhì)量越來越多的關(guān)注，社會群體意識到高等教育是直接為自我服務(wù)的，，自身有權(quán)利及義務(wù)對高等教育的質(zhì)量進(jìn)行評價(jià)，因此大學(xué)社會評價(jià)也是在這樣的條件下產(chǎn)生的。 縱觀國內(nèi)外大學(xué)社會評價(jià)的現(xiàn)狀可以發(fā)現(xiàn)，我國的大學(xué)社會評價(jià)存在嚴(yán)重的不足，其中根本的問題是評價(jià)模式的問題。正因?yàn)槟Ｊ降难芯渴蔷哂猩钸h(yuǎn)意義的，而現(xiàn)階段對于大學(xué)社會評價(jià)模式的研究又相對較少，因此只有對大學(xué)社會評價(jià)的模式進(jìn)行深入的探討，才能找到問題的根源和解決問題的方法。 本文正是基于對大學(xué)社會評價(jià)模式問題的關(guān)注，首先從模式論著手進(jìn)行分析，將現(xiàn)有的國內(nèi)外大學(xué)社會評價(jià)模式分為三類，分別是：認(rèn)證評價(jià)模式、排名評價(jià)模式及評議評價(jià)模式，通過對三類大學(xué)社會評價(jià)模式運(yùn)行要素的分析，總結(jié)出各類評價(jià)模式的特點(diǎn)。其次，選取美國、英國和日本這三個發(fā)達(dá)國家，通過對它們大學(xué)社會評價(jià)模式的研究，總結(jié)出各國大學(xué)社會評價(jià)模式的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)及共同特點(diǎn)，之所以選取這三個國家是因?yàn)樗鼈兊拇髮W(xué)社會評價(jià)模式發(fā)展的比較完善且有各自的特色值得我國借鑒。之后，對我國現(xiàn)有的排名評價(jià)模式和評議評價(jià)模式的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析，找出我國大學(xué)社會評價(jià)模式存在的不足及產(chǎn)生的原因，最后根據(jù)本文的研究總結(jié)出符合我國國情的大學(xué)社會評價(jià)模式應(yīng)當(dāng)是怎樣的，并對如何去構(gòu)建這樣的模式提出相應(yīng)的對策，希望通過本人的研究能夠?qū)ξ覈髮W(xué)社會評價(jià)的發(fā)展有所裨益。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of higher education in China, the establishment of the hierarchical management education system has made the pluralistic main body of running a school and the educational administrative department devolving more and more power to run a school. Therefore, the evaluation of the quality of higher education has been evaluated by the government. The multivariate evaluation of school self-evaluation and social evaluation, the government evaluation and university self-evaluation in our country have developed more mature in the long-term higher education quality assurance process. The social evaluation of universities started late and slowly. As the society pays more and more attention to the quality of higher education, social groups realize that higher education serves themselves directly and has the right and duty to evaluate the quality of higher education. Therefore, the university social evaluation is also produced under such conditions. Looking at the present situation of university social evaluation at home and abroad, it can be found that there are serious deficiencies in university social evaluation in our country, among which the fundamental problem is the evaluation model. Just because the research of the model is of far-reaching significance, the research on the social evaluation model of the university is relatively few at present, so it is only to carry on the thorough discussion to the model of the university social evaluation. In order to find the root of the problem and the solution to the problem. This paper is based on the concern of the university social evaluation model, first of all, from the mode theory to analyze, the existing domestic and foreign university social evaluation model is divided into three categories, respectively: certification evaluation model, By analyzing the operating elements of the three kinds of university social evaluation models, the characteristics of each kind of evaluation models are summarized. Secondly, three developed countries, the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan, are selected to sum up the advantages and disadvantages and common characteristics of their university social evaluation models through the research of their university social evaluation models. The reason for choosing these three countries is that their university social evaluation model is more perfect and has its own characteristics to be used for reference by our country. After that, this paper analyzes the status quo of the rank evaluation model and the evaluation model in China, and finds out the shortcomings and causes of the social evaluation model in our country. Finally, according to the research of this paper, the author summarizes how the university social evaluation model should be in line with the national conditions of our country, and puts forward the corresponding countermeasures on how to construct such a model. It is hoped that my research will benefit the development of university social evaluation in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長沙理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G647

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李守福;論大學(xué)的社會評價(jià)[J];比較教育研究;2003年05期

2 楊鳳英;毛祖桓;;美國高等教育中介組織的功能及其啟示[J];比較教育研究;2006年01期

3 蔣家瓊;姚利民;游柱然;;英國高等教育外部質(zhì)量保障組織體系及啟示[J];比較教育研究;2010年01期

4 崔艷麗;;《泰晤士報(bào)高等教育》大學(xué)排行評價(jià)方法的改變[J];大學(xué)(學(xué)術(shù)版);2010年09期

5 黃鴻鴻;大學(xué)社會評價(jià)勢在必行[J];福州師專學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

6 韓芳;李維U

本文編號：2283131