【摘要】：隨著現(xiàn)代大學(xué)逐步從社會(huì)的邊緣走向社會(huì)的中心,開(kāi)放的大學(xué)已經(jīng)成為各種價(jià)值主體活動(dòng)的共同場(chǎng)所。現(xiàn)代大學(xué)必須盡量滿足多元利益相關(guān)主體的需求,就大學(xué)內(nèi)部來(lái)說(shuō),必須滿足教師群體、管理者群體和學(xué)生群體的需求。與此同時(shí),用治理理論來(lái)改善現(xiàn)代大學(xué)管理已成為各國(guó)政府和高等教育界普遍關(guān)注的問(wèn)題,實(shí)行大學(xué)治理已是大勢(shì)所趨。治理的核心在于權(quán)力的轉(zhuǎn)移與重新分配,政府治理和公司治理研究的興起為大學(xué)內(nèi)部治理模式的構(gòu)建提供了理論基礎(chǔ)和現(xiàn)實(shí)參照。大學(xué)作為特殊的社會(huì)組織,其理念和目標(biāo)必須在一定的大學(xué)內(nèi)部治理模式之下才能真正得以實(shí)現(xiàn)。建立良好的大學(xué)內(nèi)部治理模式有利于使大學(xué)內(nèi)部的各利益相關(guān)主體在權(quán)利、責(zé)任和利益上相互制衡,實(shí)現(xiàn)大學(xué)內(nèi)部效率和公平的合理統(tǒng)一。并且,在這個(gè)過(guò)程中最關(guān)鍵的還在于大學(xué)內(nèi)部各利益主體能夠通過(guò)各種合法的途徑和方式主動(dòng)將情感、智慧等投入到大學(xué)管理活動(dòng)中,對(duì)大學(xué)內(nèi)部治理進(jìn)行多方面、多層次的參與,并相互分享治理權(quán)力、分擔(dān)治理責(zé)任。 目前,過(guò)于行政化的大學(xué)治理模式已不能適應(yīng)現(xiàn)代大學(xué)的發(fā)展趨勢(shì),也限制了大學(xué)內(nèi)部各主體參與大學(xué)治理的要求,導(dǎo)致了我國(guó)大學(xué)內(nèi)部治理中全員參與的困境。這些困境歸結(jié)起來(lái)主要體現(xiàn)在參與主體、參與層次、參與機(jī)制和參與信息上。那么這些困境產(chǎn)生的原因在于參與者自身的因素、體制因素、法律因素和文化因素。在今后的大學(xué)內(nèi)部治理中,我們應(yīng)當(dāng)轉(zhuǎn)變觀念以提高全員參與意識(shí)；健全法律制度為全員參與保駕護(hù)航；完善參與機(jī)制以保證全員參與有序進(jìn)行；重塑文化以營(yíng)造全員參與氛圍。
[Abstract]:With the development of modern universities from the edge of society to the center of society, open universities have become a common place for all kinds of value subjects. Modern universities must meet the needs of multiple stakeholders as far as possible, and within universities, they must meet the needs of teachers, managers and students. At the same time, using governance theory to improve the management of modern universities has become a common concern of governments and higher education circles, and the implementation of university governance has become the trend of the times. The core of governance lies in the transfer and redistribution of power. The rise of the research on government governance and corporate governance provides the theoretical basis and practical reference for the construction of university internal governance model. As a special social organization, the idea and goal of university must be realized under certain internal governance mode. The establishment of a good internal governance model of the university is conducive to balancing the rights, responsibilities and interests of the various stakeholders within the university, and to realize the reasonable unity of efficiency and fairness within the university. Moreover, the most crucial thing in this process is that the various stakeholders within the university can actively put emotion and wisdom into the university management activities through various legal ways and means, and carry on various aspects of the internal governance of the university. Multi-level participation, and mutual sharing of governance power, share governance responsibility. At present, the mode of university governance, which is too administrative, can no longer adapt to the development trend of modern universities, and also restricts the requirements of participating in the governance of universities by various subjects within universities, which leads to the dilemma of full participation in the internal governance of universities in our country. These difficulties can be summed up mainly in the participation subject, the participation level, the participation mechanism and the participation information. The causes of these dilemmas lie in the participants' own factors, institutional factors, legal factors and cultural factors. In the future university internal governance, we should change the concept to improve the consciousness of all staff participation, improve the legal system for the full participation escort, improve the participation mechanism to ensure the participation of all members in an orderly manner; Reshape culture to create an atmosphere of full participation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：G647;D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李福華;尹增剛;;論大學(xué)治理的理論基礎(chǔ)——國(guó)際視野中的多學(xué)科觀點(diǎn)[J];比較教育研究;2007年09期

2 謝凌凌;張瓊;;共治視閾下大學(xué)權(quán)力的生成、表征及協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制研究[J];國(guó)家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年11期

3 張意忠;;教授治學(xué):大學(xué)內(nèi)部治理模式[J];航海教育研究;2008年01期

4 肖應(yīng)紅;;關(guān)于我國(guó)高校內(nèi)部治理結(jié)構(gòu)重建問(wèn)題的思考[J];黑龍江高教研究;2007年09期

5 矢野真和,徐國(guó)興;大學(xué)的治權(quán):理念和資金的關(guān)系[J];教育與經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年01期

6 潘海生;張宇;;利益相關(guān)者與現(xiàn)代大學(xué)治理結(jié)構(gòu)的構(gòu)建[J];教育評(píng)論;2007年01期

7 郭麗;茹寧;;大學(xué)治理理論及我國(guó)大學(xué)的治理對(duì)策探析[J];南昌航空大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期

8 甘永濤;;權(quán)威-目的兩分法:大學(xué)治理模式解析[J];教育發(fā)展研究;2006年21期

9 趙成;陳通;;現(xiàn)代大學(xué)治理結(jié)構(gòu)解析[J];天津大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年06期

10 趙澤虎;何琴;;淺析依法治校理念的深化[J];學(xué)校黨建與思想教育;2006年11期

，

本文編號(hào)：2120518