本文選題：學(xué)科團隊 + 核心競爭力��； 參考：《哈爾濱工程大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展，科學(xué)技術(shù)對國內(nèi)經(jīng)濟的貢獻也越來越大。另外，由于學(xué)術(shù)方向的細化和交叉學(xué)科的出現(xiàn)，科研工作對團隊協(xié)作的需求也有著較大幅度的提升。為適應(yīng)知識經(jīng)濟時代的科學(xué)技術(shù)發(fā)展的要求，本文試圖通過對高校學(xué)科團隊核心競爭力的評價并運用實證分析來驗證所構(gòu)建競爭力評價模型的實效性。本文的主要研究內(nèi)容如下： 對團隊及學(xué)科團隊相關(guān)理論進行一個綜述梳理，通過以企業(yè)、事業(yè)視角對核心競爭力的構(gòu)成要素進行分析。在此基礎(chǔ)上對學(xué)科團隊的核心競爭力進行定義與描述，為后續(xù)的研究提供理論支持。文中對我國國內(nèi)高校學(xué)科團隊的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀及其學(xué)科團隊的核心競爭力現(xiàn)狀進行分析。通過分析為下文的評價指標體系設(shè)定提供現(xiàn)實依據(jù)。通過評價模型設(shè)計原則的設(shè)定，以層次分析法和模糊綜合評價法為基礎(chǔ)構(gòu)建出基于二者的高校學(xué)科團隊核心競爭力綜合評價模型。在此基礎(chǔ)上對模型的有效性進行分析，最終得到完整的學(xué)科團隊核心競爭力評價模型。文章對R學(xué)科團隊核心競爭力進行一個實證分析，通過問卷的設(shè)計構(gòu)建出學(xué)科團隊成員配置狀況、學(xué)科團隊科研資源處理狀況、學(xué)科團隊科研成果狀況、學(xué)科團隊環(huán)境適應(yīng)狀況、學(xué)科團隊愿景規(guī)劃狀況五個維度進行考察，進一步細分出16個二級指標進行度量。通過調(diào)查問卷數(shù)據(jù)整理并最終運用前章所構(gòu)建的評價模型進行了驗證。文章最后對提升高校學(xué)科團隊的核心競爭力提出對策建議：一方面，要通過制度保障、人力資本和資金保障、組織保障來構(gòu)建出全方位的學(xué)科團隊發(fā)展保障。另一方面，要通過提升并保持優(yōu)勢學(xué)科、實施目標管理法實現(xiàn)團隊與其成員目標一致、強化知識創(chuàng)新提升學(xué)科團隊的創(chuàng)新能力。
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy, science and technology contribute more and more to domestic economy. In addition, due to the refinement of academic direction and the emergence of interdisciplinary disciplines, the demand for team work has been greatly improved. In order to meet the requirements of the development of science and technology in the era of knowledge economy, this paper attempts to verify the effectiveness of the competitiveness evaluation model constructed by the evaluation of the core competitiveness of the discipline teams in colleges and universities and the use of empirical analysis. The main contents of this paper are as follows: This paper summarizes the relevant theories of team and discipline team, and analyzes the elements of core competence from the perspective of enterprise and enterprise. On this basis, the core competence of the subject team is defined and described, which provides theoretical support for further research. This paper analyzes the present situation of the development of the discipline team and the core competence of the discipline team in our country. Through the analysis for the following evaluation index system set up to provide a realistic basis. By setting up the design principles of evaluation model, a comprehensive evaluation model of core competitiveness of university discipline team based on AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is constructed. On this basis, the validity of the model is analyzed and a complete evaluation model of the core competence of the subject team is obtained. This paper makes an empirical analysis on the core competence of R subject team, and through the design of questionnaire, it constructs the status of subject team member configuration, subject team scientific research resource processing, subject team scientific research achievement. Subject team environment adaptation, subject team vision planning status of five dimensions were investigated, further subdivided into 16 secondary indicators to measure. Finally, the evaluation model constructed in the previous chapter is used to verify the questionnaire data. Finally, the paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to enhance the core competitiveness of discipline teams in colleges and universities: on the one hand, it is necessary to construct a comprehensive discipline team development guarantee through institutional security, human capital and financial security, and organizational security. On the other hand, we should promote and maintain the superior discipline, implement the objective management method to achieve the same goal between the team and its members, and strengthen the knowledge innovation to enhance the innovation ability of the discipline team.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工程大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G647

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張纓;中國轉(zhuǎn)型期企業(yè)間經(jīng)濟活動“低信任”違約現(xiàn)象的社會學(xué)解釋[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期

2 朱小雷,吳碩賢;大學(xué)校園環(huán)境主觀質(zhì)量的多級模糊綜合評價[J];城市規(guī)劃;2002年10期

3 張凡;關(guān)于獨立董事制度幾個問題的認識[J];管理世界;2003年02期

4 李海艦,聶輝華;企業(yè)的競爭優(yōu)勢來源及其戰(zhàn)略選擇[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2002年09期

5 胡恩華,單紅梅,陳燕;企業(yè)核心競爭力的識別及綜合模糊評價[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2004年01期

6 黃再勝;獨立董事獨立性、關(guān)聯(lián)激勵與行為均衡[J];當代經(jīng)濟科學(xué);2004年03期

7 王玉翠;;企業(yè)核心競爭力評價指標體系建立與模糊評價[J];東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年01期

8 金碚;論企業(yè)競爭力的性質(zhì)[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2001年10期

9 劉先鋒,吳娟,劉士通;基于層次分析法和灰色關(guān)聯(lián)決策的野戰(zhàn)倉庫選址模型研究[J];物流技術(shù);2005年09期

10 李品媛;基于核心競爭力的企業(yè)多元化戰(zhàn)略模式分析[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2003年12期

，

本文編號：1928420