本文選題：科研績效考核 + 教師評價��； 參考：《湖南大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：當今高等院校都把提高人才培養(yǎng)質(zhì)量、提升科學研究水平、增強社會服務能力作為高校的三大職能，對于不同類型的高校側(cè)重點也不盡相同。論文選取了一所全國性重點大學湖南大學作為研究對象，湖南大學是一所綜合性研究型大學，科學研究管理在學校的日常管理工作中占有重要比重。所以，如何發(fā)揮科研績效評價對學�？蒲泄ぷ鞯拇龠M作用，使績效考核更好地服務于學校發(fā)展目標對湖南大學的整個管理體制意義重大。論文以此為切入點，查閱大量相關文獻和資料，采用對湖南大學相關教師進行問卷調(diào)查和集中采訪的方式，運用定性與定量的分析方法，全面研究了湖南大學科研績效考核評估體系的現(xiàn)狀及意義、目前存在的問題和改進的措施。論文首先闡述了湖南大學現(xiàn)行的評價體系具有明確的目標并且符合學校的長遠發(fā)展規(guī)劃；然后適時提出學校科研評價指標存在教學與科研考核比例失調(diào)、量化標準和評價標準的針對性不強、青年教師的科研能力需要加強等問題并對原因進行深入地剖析；接著針對論文反映的問題進一步提出學校層面應對科研績效考核思想上重視、組織上加強學術道德建設以確保學術自由、實施上加強指標的針對性，，特別是促進青年教師的發(fā)展等具體改進措施；最后論文對全文主要的研究內(nèi)容和研究成果進行了總結(jié)，對論文研究中存在的困惑和不足進行了說明，并對今后如何開展科研績效考核工作進行了展望，提出每所高校都應該摸索適合本校教師的科研績效評估體系，找出最有效的考核體系。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, colleges and universities regard improving the quality of talents training, improving the level of scientific research and enhancing the ability of social service as the three functions of colleges and universities, with different emphases on different types of colleges and universities. The thesis selects a national key university Hunan University as the research object. Hunan University is a comprehensive research university. Scientific research management plays an important role in the daily management of the university. Therefore, it is of great significance for the management system of Hunan University to give full play to the promotion of scientific research performance evaluation to the scientific research work, and to make the performance appraisal serve the development goal of the school better. This paper regards this as the breakthrough point, referring to a large number of relevant documents and materials, adopting the way of questionnaire survey and centralized interview to the relevant teachers of Hunan University, using qualitative and quantitative analysis methods. This paper studies the present situation and significance of the evaluation system of scientific research performance in Hunan University, the existing problems and the measures to improve it. This paper first expounds that the current evaluation system of Hunan University has clear goals and conforms to the long-term development plan of the university, and then points out that there is a imbalance between teaching and scientific research assessment in the evaluation index of school scientific research. The pertinence of the quantitative standard and evaluation standard is not strong, the young teachers' scientific research ability needs to be strengthened, and the reasons are analyzed deeply. Then, aiming at the problems reflected in the paper, the author puts forward that the school should pay more attention to the evaluation of scientific research performance, strengthen the construction of academic morality in order to ensure academic freedom, and strengthen the pertinence of the indicators. Especially to promote the development of young teachers and other specific improvement measures. Finally, the paper summarizes the main research content and research results, and explains the puzzles and shortcomings in the research. This paper also looks forward to how to carry out the evaluation of scientific research performance in the future, and puts forward that each university should explore the scientific research performance evaluation system suitable for its teachers, and find out the most effective assessment system.
【學位授予單位】：湖南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G645.1;G644

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李子彥;;關于當前高校教師科研業(yè)績評價有效性的思考[J];太原師范學院學報(社會科學版);2006年03期

2 武向榮;;教師科研績效激勵機制研究——基于新制度經(jīng)濟學的視角[J];教師教育研究;2009年06期

3 董志峰;;高校年終考核存在的問題與對策研究[J];高教論壇;2006年02期

4 孫二軍;;大學的分化與科研的定位[J];高教探索;2008年06期

5 楊麗霞;簡毓峰;;國內(nèi)外高校科研績效評價研究綜述[J];甘肅高師學報;2007年05期

6 范文曜,張偉;英國高等教育的評估和大學撥款[J];理工高教研究;2003年06期

7 胡金秀,周國強,張炳燭,趙建華,李曉華,張英杰;高校教師科研工作量化考核體系的建立與實踐[J];經(jīng)濟師;2003年10期

8 齊晶晶;;淺析我國高校人文社會科學教師科研績效評價的變革[J];現(xiàn)代教育科學;2009年11期

9 張敏;;對高校教師科研業(yè)績量化指標設計的思考[J];金融教學與研究;2010年02期

10 張將星;王占軍;;美國高校教師績效評價:主體、內(nèi)容與方法[J];中國大學教學;2011年05期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 王勇明;中國高校教師激勵機制實證研究[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學;2007年

本文編號：1904498