本文選題：研究生教育 + 教育質(zhì)量��； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：質(zhì)量是研究生教育的生命,是研究生教育持續(xù)發(fā)展的一個(gè)根本保證,評(píng)價(jià)研究生的教育質(zhì)量需要建立相應(yīng)的教育質(zhì)量評(píng)估體系。目前我國(guó)的研究生教育質(zhì)量評(píng)估體系主要集中在政府、學(xué)校和一些社會(huì)評(píng)估機(jī)構(gòu)。評(píng)估的指標(biāo)大多集中在師資隊(duì)伍、學(xué)校硬件設(shè)施、專業(yè)設(shè)置、教學(xué)改革、教學(xué)管理等方面。研究生教育質(zhì)量的評(píng)估不僅應(yīng)該包括政府學(xué)校的評(píng)估,更應(yīng)該吸納來(lái)自用人單位、社會(huì)公眾的評(píng)價(jià),使之形成一個(gè)立體評(píng)價(jià)網(wǎng)絡(luò),揚(yáng)長(zhǎng)避短,充分發(fā)揮各種評(píng)價(jià)形式的作用,以提高研究生教育質(zhì)量。本文運(yùn)用了文獻(xiàn)資料法、專家訪談法、問(wèn)卷調(diào)查法、特菲爾法等研究方法,對(duì)目前我國(guó)體育學(xué)碩士研究生教育質(zhì)量社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)的指標(biāo)現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行調(diào)查和分析。并根據(jù)調(diào)查的結(jié)果運(yùn)用層次分析法,計(jì)算出了各因素對(duì)目標(biāo)的影響權(quán)重大小,從而構(gòu)建了體育學(xué)碩士研究生教育質(zhì)量社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。 本文的主要研究結(jié)論有以下五點(diǎn) 1、要有真正意義上的社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)中介機(jī)構(gòu)。目前我國(guó)研究生教育質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)的目的主要是為政府部門服務(wù),滿足政府需要,其評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果也就具有單一性,不能真正適應(yīng)社會(huì)需求。要達(dá)到理想中的社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)必須具有真正意義上的社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)中介機(jī)構(gòu)。 2、界定了體育學(xué)碩士研究生教育質(zhì)量社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)的定義。體育學(xué)碩士研究生教育質(zhì)量社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)是指不同的評(píng)價(jià)主體(本文指用人單位、畢業(yè)生本人、社會(huì)公眾)對(duì)體育學(xué)碩士畢業(yè)生適應(yīng)社會(huì)需求程度進(jìn)行的衡量和評(píng)定。 3、得出目前我國(guó)體育學(xué)碩士研究生教育質(zhì)量社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)與其他學(xué)科評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)間共性多、個(gè)性少的特點(diǎn)。 4、設(shè)計(jì)出體育學(xué)碩士研究生教育質(zhì)量社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)的具體指標(biāo),其中一級(jí)指標(biāo)3個(gè)、二級(jí)指標(biāo)9個(gè)、三級(jí)指標(biāo)33個(gè)。 5、建立體育學(xué)碩士研究生教育質(zhì)量社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。運(yùn)用層次分析法和相應(yīng)的問(wèn)卷數(shù)據(jù),建立數(shù)學(xué)模型,同時(shí)對(duì)指標(biāo)權(quán)重進(jìn)行賦值,最終構(gòu)建了體育學(xué)碩士研究生教育質(zhì)量社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。
[Abstract]:Quality is the life of graduate education and a fundamental guarantee for the sustainable development of graduate education. It is necessary to establish a corresponding educational quality evaluation system to evaluate the quality of graduate education. At present, the quality evaluation system of graduate education in China is mainly concentrated in the government, schools and some social evaluation institutions. Most of the evaluation indexes focus on teaching staff, school hardware, specialty setting, teaching reform, teaching management and so on. The evaluation of the quality of graduate education should not only include the evaluation of government schools, but also include the evaluation from employers and the public, so that it can form a three-dimensional evaluation network, which can promote its strengths and circumvent its weaknesses, and give full play to the role of various forms of evaluation. In order to improve the quality of graduate education. By using the methods of literature, expert interview, questionnaire investigation and Tefer's method, this paper investigates and analyzes the present situation of the social evaluation index of the education quality of the postgraduates of physical education in China. According to the results of the investigation, the influence weight of each factor on the target was calculated by using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and the social evaluation index system of the education quality of the postgraduates in physical education was constructed. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows 1, must have the real sense social appraisal intermediary organization. At present, the purpose of the quality evaluation of graduate education in China is to serve the government departments and meet the needs of the government, so the evaluation results are single and can not meet the needs of the society. In order to achieve the ideal social evaluation, we must have a real social evaluation intermediary. 2. The definition of social evaluation of education quality of postgraduates in physical education is defined. The social evaluation of the education quality of the postgraduates of physical education is the measurement and evaluation of the degree of adaptation to the needs of the society by different evaluation subjects (this article refers to the employing unit, the graduates themselves and the public). 3. It is concluded that there are more commonness and less individuality between the social evaluation indexes of the education quality of the postgraduates of physical education in our country and the evaluation indexes of other disciplines at present. 4. The concrete indexes of social evaluation of education quality of postgraduates in physical education are designed, including 3 first-grade indexes, 9 second-class indexes and 33 third-class indexes. 5. Establish the social evaluation index system of education quality for postgraduates of physical education. By using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the corresponding questionnaire data, the mathematical model was established, and the index weight was assigned. Finally, the social evaluation index system of the education quality of the postgraduates in physical education was constructed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：G643;G807.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李守福;論大學(xué)的社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)[J];比較教育研究;2003年05期

2 王璐;王向旭;;當(dāng)今英國(guó)研究生教育規(guī)模和結(jié)構(gòu)的變化與走向[J];比較教育研究;2007年12期

3 譚廣;馬衛(wèi)平;;體育教育訓(xùn)練學(xué)碩士研究生課程體系建設(shè)探究[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

4 李鴻江;趙德勛;常志利;任占兵;尹軍;;中英體育學(xué)科碩士研究生課程結(jié)構(gòu)與培養(yǎng)模式的比較研究[J];首都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

5 趙鐵,林昆勇;人才培養(yǎng)質(zhì)量社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建[J];高教論壇;2004年03期

6 孟衛(wèi)青;吳開俊;;日本研究生教育質(zhì)量評(píng)估體系的轉(zhuǎn)型:經(jīng)驗(yàn)與問(wèn)題[J];繼續(xù)教育研究;2010年06期

7 問(wèn)青松;田俊榮;;從質(zhì)量的視角審視我國(guó)研究生教育評(píng)估指標(biāo)體系[J];現(xiàn)代教育科學(xué);2007年09期

8 張秀紅;;1990年以來(lái)日本研究生教育改革與發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];教育與考試;2008年05期

9 張玉琴,崔巍;日本高等教育的兩種評(píng)估制度及其相互關(guān)系淺析[J];日本學(xué)刊;2004年03期

10 尹飛飛;體育學(xué)研究生學(xué)位與培養(yǎng)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀及對(duì)策[J];成都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1870740