本文選題：入學(xué)機會　切入點：高等教育公平　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國正在從消除由階級差距造成的教育機會的不平等到促進更大的社會流動的有差距的平等邁進,而且,目前自主招生忽視對弱勢群體的學(xué)業(yè)補償、少數(shù)民族身份造假帶來的民眾對民族加分政策的質(zhì)疑、以及高考移民現(xiàn)象透露出的高等教育入學(xué)機會的省際差距等問題都證實著建立合理的高等教育入學(xué)機會公平評價指標體系不僅尤為重要,而且已迫在眉睫。本文通過實證研究和因子分析法建立了高等教育入學(xué)機會公平評價指標體系,體系由五個一級指標和十個二級指標構(gòu)成。文章分別從地區(qū)和維度兩個方面對該體系進行了分析應(yīng)用,并闡述了高等教育入學(xué)機會在五維度上出現(xiàn)差距的原因。 基于以上研究,得出以下結(jié)論：①省際差距和城鄉(xiāng)差距均普遍高于民族差距和性別差距；②西南地區(qū)的高等教育入學(xué)機會最為不公,華東最為公平,華北處于中間程度。③階層指數(shù)在地域上的基尼系數(shù)是最高的,是造成入學(xué)機會最為不公的一項指數(shù)；④華北、東北和華南的入學(xué)機會指數(shù)較為接近,為一類；華東、華中、西北為一類。⑤各地區(qū)的高等教育財政性經(jīng)費越少,當?shù)厝雽W(xué)機會的性別和階層差距越大；⑥教學(xué)和評價中的補償性教育理念愈明顯,入學(xué)機會的民族差距和城鄉(xiāng)差距越大；⑦家庭的社會關(guān)系資本越小,入學(xué)機會的省際差距越大。 希望該體系能夠為客觀科學(xué)的評價高等教育入學(xué)機會公平狀況提供依據(jù),并以此監(jiān)督和改善我國高等教育招生制度的改革。
[Abstract]:Our country is moving from eliminating inequalities in educational opportunities caused by class disparities to equality in promoting greater social mobility, and, at present, independent enrolment ignores academic compensation for vulnerable groups. The people's doubts about the ethnic bonus policy brought about by the false identity of ethnic minorities, The problems such as the gap between provinces of higher education entrance opportunities revealed by the emigration phenomenon of college entrance examination have proved that it is not only particularly important to establish a reasonable evaluation index system of higher education entrance opportunities. And it is urgent. This paper establishes a fair evaluation index system of higher education entrance opportunity through empirical research and factor analysis. The system is composed of five primary indicators and ten secondary indicators. This paper analyzes and applies the system from the two aspects of region and dimension, and expounds the reasons for the disparity in the five dimensions of higher education entrance opportunities. Based on the above research, we can draw the following conclusions: the gap between provinces and urban and rural areas is generally higher than that between ethnic groups and gender gaps. In southwest China, higher education opportunities are the most unfair, and East China is the fairest. The Gini coefficient of the middle-class index in North China is the highest in the region, and it is the most unfair index in terms of enrollment opportunities. 4. In North China, the index of admission opportunities in Northeast and South China is relatively close, which is a class; East China, Central China, The smaller the financial funds for higher education in the Northwest of China is, the greater the gender and class gap in local entrance opportunities is. 6 the more obvious is the idea of compensatory education in teaching and evaluation. The greater the gap between the ethnic groups and the urban and rural areas, the smaller the social capital of families, and the greater the inter-provincial gap. It is hoped that this system can provide a basis for the objective and scientific evaluation of the fair situation of higher education admission opportunities, and thus supervise and improve the reform of China's higher education enrollment system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G649.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳曉云;中外高校招生制度比較與研究[J];比較教育研究;2003年04期

2 滕s，

本文編號：1589584