本文關(guān)鍵詞： 學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì) 運(yùn)行模式 學(xué)術(shù)管理　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)章程是學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)的工作綱領(lǐng)，是動(dòng)態(tài)反應(yīng)其內(nèi)部運(yùn)作機(jī)理、體現(xiàn)章程制定者利益訴求的規(guī)范化制度設(shè)計(jì)。自《中華人民共和國(guó)高等教育法》頒布以來，國(guó)內(nèi)各高校先后設(shè)立了學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)并制定了相關(guān)的章程、條例、細(xì)則。然而，學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)在其實(shí)際運(yùn)作過程中并未真正體現(xiàn)其“教授治學(xué)、學(xué)術(shù)自由、民主管理”的設(shè)立初衷，逐漸淪落為一種尷尬的“擺設(shè)”或“工具”。 中國(guó)公立高校學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)研究是一個(gè)既有理論價(jià)值又有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義的研究課題。不僅能夠?yàn)楦叩葘W(xué)校內(nèi)部管理體制和運(yùn)行機(jī)制改革提供理論支持，同時(shí)也符合《國(guó)家中長(zhǎng)期教育改革和發(fā)展規(guī)劃綱要》和《高等教育法》的內(nèi)在要求。對(duì)學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)運(yùn)行模式的研究有利于明晰各級(jí)學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)的職責(zé)與權(quán)限，有利于實(shí)現(xiàn)行政權(quán)力與學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的分離，有利于提高學(xué)術(shù)管理過程的科學(xué)性、民主性與高效性。 本文首先對(duì)學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)運(yùn)行模式的基本概念和相關(guān)理論基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行了闡述，并對(duì)我國(guó)大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)制度的歷史源流進(jìn)行了回顧。通過對(duì)西方大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)評(píng)議會(huì)的發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn)及其學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系模式的借鑒，總結(jié)歸納出了西方大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)治理過程中以“學(xué)術(shù)自由、共同治理、專業(yè)自主”為核心的三項(xiàng)基本原則及其“分權(quán)制衡、科層式管理、委員會(huì)制、校長(zhǎng)職業(yè)化”的現(xiàn)代特征。之后，，通過抽取15所不同層次、類型、區(qū)域的中國(guó)公立高校學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)章程作為文本樣例，從職能定位、組織架構(gòu)、人員構(gòu)成、運(yùn)作機(jī)理、監(jiān)督保障等方面對(duì)我國(guó)公立高校的學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)的運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了調(diào)查分析。從組織結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系、權(quán)力配置模式、學(xué)術(shù)管理體制等角度出發(fā)，對(duì)我國(guó)大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)現(xiàn)存的問題及原因進(jìn)行了闡釋。 研究認(rèn)為，中國(guó)公立高校學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)合理運(yùn)行應(yīng)堅(jiān)持學(xué)術(shù)自由、民主管理、教授治學(xué)的基本原則，具備以學(xué)術(shù)為本的管理體制、責(zé)權(quán)分明的機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置、協(xié)調(diào)均衡的人員配置、民主科學(xué)的決策機(jī)制、系統(tǒng)完備的監(jiān)督體制為內(nèi)容的基本要素，體現(xiàn)學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)作為大學(xué)內(nèi)部學(xué)術(shù)決策機(jī)構(gòu)的科學(xué)、民主、獨(dú)立、高效。
[Abstract]:The constitution of the academic committee is the work program of the academic committee, and it is the design of a standardized system that dynamically reflects its internal operating mechanism and embodies the interests of the framers. Since the promulgation of the higher Education Law of the people's Republic of China, Academic committees have been set up successively in various colleges and universities in China, and relevant articles, regulations and rules have been drawn up. However, in the course of their actual operation, the academic committees have not really reflected their original intention of "teaching academic research, academic freedom, democratic management". Gradually fall into an awkward "furnishings" or "tools". The research on the academic committee of China's public universities is a research subject of both theoretical and practical significance. It can not only provide theoretical support for the reform of internal management system and operational mechanism of colleges and universities, but also has practical significance. At the same time, it is also in line with the inherent requirements of the outline of the National Medium- and Long-Term Education Reform and Development Plan and the higher Education Law. The study of the operation mode of academic committees is conducive to clarifying the duties and powers of academic committees at all levels. It is helpful to realize the separation of administrative power and academic power, and to improve the scientific, democratic and efficient process of academic management. In this paper, the basic concepts and related theoretical basis of the operation mode of the academic committee are first expounded. By reviewing the history of the academic committee system of universities in China, the author draws lessons from the development experience of the academic council of western universities and the relationship between academic power structure and academic power structure. This paper summarizes the three basic principles of "academic freedom, common governance, and professional autonomy" in the process of academic governance in western universities and their "separation of powers and checks and balances, hierarchical management, committee system," After that, by selecting 15 different levels, types and regions of the articles of association of the academic committees of China's public colleges and universities as text examples, from the aspects of function orientation, organizational structure, personnel composition, operation mechanism, From the aspects of supervision and security, this paper investigates and analyzes the operation status of academic committees in public colleges and universities in China. From the perspectives of organizational structure, power allocation model, academic management system, etc. This paper expounds the existing problems and reasons of the academic committee of universities in China. The study holds that the rational operation of the academic committees of Chinese public universities should adhere to the basic principles of academic freedom, democratic management, and teaching and scholarship, have an academic-oriented management system, have distinct responsibilities and powers of the organization, and coordinate and balance the staffing. The decision-making mechanism of democratic science and the systematic and complete supervision system are the basic elements of the content, which embodies the scientific, democratic, independent and efficient academic committee as the academic decision-making organization within the university.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：G644

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇寶利,呂貴;審議方向·參與決策·監(jiān)督控制——談學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)在高校決策體制中的地位與作用[J];高等工程教育研究;2003年04期

2 畢憲順;劉慶東;;高校內(nèi)部權(quán)力的科學(xué)配置及其運(yùn)行機(jī)制研究[J];國(guó)家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年08期

3 馮向東;;大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的實(shí)踐邏輯[J];高等教育研究;2010年04期

4 祁占勇;;高等學(xué)校學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力本位治理結(jié)構(gòu)的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境與邏輯路向[J];高等教育研究;2011年02期

5 龐海芍;;大學(xué)管理中的學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力與行政權(quán)力[J];黑龍江高教研究;2006年10期

6 王建美;宋靜波;;從增強(qiáng)學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的視角透析學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)章程——基于34所高校學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)章程文本的探討[J];現(xiàn)代教育科學(xué);2011年09期

7 姚葉;廖湘陽;;高校行政權(quán)力與學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的沖突與整合——基于第三部門的視野[J];江蘇高教;2006年02期

8 畢憲順;趙鳳娟;甘金球;;教授委員會(huì):學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力主導(dǎo)的高校內(nèi)部管理體制[J];教育研究;2011年09期

9 李海萍;;高校學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀的實(shí)證研究[J];教育研究;2011年10期

10 廖湘陽;;學(xué)科會(huì)聚過程中的決策模式研究[J];科技管理研究;2009年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 朱家德;權(quán)力的規(guī)制：大學(xué)章程的歷史流變與與當(dāng)代形態(tài)[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

2 趙俊芳;論大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

3 張意忠;論教授治學(xué)[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年

4 林榮日;制度變遷中的權(quán)力博弈[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2006年

5 郭卉;權(quán)利訴求與大學(xué)治理[D];華中科技大學(xué);2006年

6 查永軍;中國(guó)大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)管理中的學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力與行政權(quán)力沖突研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2009年

7 李海萍;大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力現(xiàn)狀研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年

8 彭陽紅;論“教授治校”[D];華中科技大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1523274