本文關(guān)鍵詞：基于教學(xué)管理視角的我國(guó)政府與公立高等學(xué)校的權(quán)責(zé)關(guān)系研究　出處：《華南理工大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 教育行政 政府與高校 權(quán)責(zé)關(guān)系

【摘要】：隨著現(xiàn)代社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展以及高等教育的大眾化，我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的大學(xué)制度面臨前所未有的挑戰(zhàn)，《國(guó)家中長(zhǎng)期教育改革和發(fā)展規(guī)劃綱要(2010-2020年)》，把提高人才培養(yǎng)質(zhì)量和增強(qiáng)社會(huì)服務(wù)能力列為高等教育下一階段的發(fā)展任務(wù)，同時(shí)提出了推進(jìn)政校分開(kāi)、管辦分離，落實(shí)和擴(kuò)大學(xué)校辦學(xué)自主權(quán)，完善中國(guó)特色現(xiàn)代大學(xué)制度的體制改革要求。 研究政府與高等學(xué)校的關(guān)系，理清政府部門和高等學(xué)校各自的權(quán)力與責(zé)任，明晰哪些是政府“該管的”，哪些是“不該管，管不好”的，探索一種在政府部門監(jiān)督與指導(dǎo)下，高等學(xué)校既能自我發(fā)展又能自我約束的現(xiàn)代大學(xué)制度，促使政府和高等學(xué)校合理使用權(quán)力，使政府部門有權(quán)善用，高等學(xué)校有權(quán)可用，正是推進(jìn)政校分開(kāi)、管辦分離，落實(shí)高等學(xué)校辦學(xué)自主權(quán)，建立中國(guó)特色現(xiàn)代大學(xué)制度的前提，是全社會(huì)都十分關(guān)心的問(wèn)題。 本文以政府與高等學(xué)校的權(quán)責(zé)關(guān)系為研究對(duì)象，運(yùn)用政府角色理論、新公共管理理論和行政生態(tài)學(xué)等理論知識(shí)分析政府監(jiān)管高等學(xué)校的合理性和必然性、政府和高等學(xué)校的角色定位、政府和高等學(xué)校的權(quán)力界限等,以政府與某公立高等學(xué)校教學(xué)管理部門間的行政往來(lái)公文為實(shí)例，對(duì)政府與高等學(xué)校的關(guān)系進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究，得出政府在對(duì)高等學(xué)校的監(jiān)管過(guò)程中，存在管理越位和服務(wù)缺位的問(wèn)題。認(rèn)為相關(guān)法律的可執(zhí)行性不強(qiáng)、政府與高等學(xué)校的權(quán)力界限模糊，政府對(duì)學(xué)校管理越位和服務(wù)缺位是造成府學(xué)關(guān)系失衡的原因，失衡的府學(xué)關(guān)系又帶來(lái)高等學(xué)校缺乏辦學(xué)特色，人才培養(yǎng)質(zhì)量達(dá)不到社會(huì)預(yù)期，教育行政化色彩濃厚，學(xué)術(shù)自由得不到應(yīng)有的尊重等廣受詬病的高等教育問(wèn)題，提出了完善相關(guān)法律，提高法律的可執(zhí)行性，明確界定政府與高等學(xué)校的管理權(quán)力，制定共同遵守的大學(xué)章程，優(yōu)化教育評(píng)價(jià)體系，，引入非官方教育評(píng)價(jià)機(jī)構(gòu)，通過(guò)項(xiàng)目委托等形式加強(qiáng)府學(xué)合作等改進(jìn)建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of modern society and economy and the popularization of higher education, the current university system in China is facing unprecedented challenges. The outline of the National medium- and Long-Term Education Reform and Development Plan 2010-2020 lists improving the quality of personnel training and enhancing the ability of social services as the next stage of the development of higher education. At the same time, it puts forward the system reform requirements of promoting the separation of government and school, separating management and administration, implementing and expanding the autonomy of running schools, and perfecting the system of modern universities with Chinese characteristics. This paper studies the relationship between government and colleges and universities, clarifies the respective powers and responsibilities of government departments and institutions of higher learning, and clarifies what the government "should manage" and which "should not, not be well managed". This paper explores a modern university system under the supervision and guidance of the government departments, which can develop and restrain itself, promote the rational use of power by the government and institutions of higher learning, and make the government departments have the right to make good use of it. It is the premise of promoting the separation of political and school management, implementing the autonomy of running a university and establishing a modern university system with Chinese characteristics that the whole society is very concerned about the right of colleges and universities to be available. This paper takes the relationship between government and institutions of higher learning as the research object, and analyzes the rationality and inevitability of government supervision of colleges and universities by using the theory of government role, new public management theory and administrative ecology. The role of government and colleges and universities, the limits of power between the government and institutions of higher learning, and so on, taking the administrative documents between the government and the teaching management department of a public university as an example. Through the empirical research on the relationship between government and colleges and universities, it is concluded that there are problems of management offside and service vacancy in the process of government supervision over institutions of higher learning, and it is considered that the enforcement of relevant laws is not strong. The boundary of power between government and higher education is blurred, the offside of government management and the absence of service are the causes of the imbalance of the school relationship, which leads to the lack of school characteristics in colleges and universities. The quality of talent training can not meet the social expectations, education is highly administrative, academic freedom can not be respected and other widely criticized issues of higher education, put forward to improve the relevant laws, improve the enforcement of the law. Clearly define the management power of the government and colleges and universities, formulate the university charter to abide by jointly, optimize the educational evaluation system, and introduce unofficial educational evaluation institutions. Through the project commission and other forms of strengthening school cooperation and other improvement proposals.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：G647;D623

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 李凌漢,周建民;高等教育市場(chǎng)化——一種明晰政府、社會(huì)和高校各自權(quán)責(zé)關(guān)系的新視角[J];教學(xué)研究;2005年01期

2 趙婷婷;自治、控制與合作——政府與大學(xué)關(guān)系的演進(jìn)歷程[J];現(xiàn)代大學(xué)教育;2001年04期

3 褚宏啟;政府與學(xué)校的關(guān)系重構(gòu)[J];教育科學(xué)研究;2005年01期

4 魏小琳;;對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)代大學(xué)制度建設(shè)的思考——大學(xué)與政府、社會(huì)關(guān)系的視界[J];紹興文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2006年06期

5 黃繼平,巫麗君;高校定位中的政府權(quán)責(zé)問(wèn)題[J];南京工業(yè)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

6 劉少雪;;我國(guó)近現(xiàn)代大學(xué)與政府關(guān)系的特點(diǎn)[J];高等教育研究;2006年03期

7 蔣洪池,林國(guó)治;歷史與啟示:中國(guó)近現(xiàn)代大學(xué)與政府權(quán)能關(guān)系之嬗變[J];煤炭高等教育;2005年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 黃穎;我國(guó)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期“府學(xué)關(guān)系”的沖突與調(diào)適[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2006年

本文編號(hào)：1431779