發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-05 02:54

【摘要】：哲學(xué)究竟是定位為科學(xué)還是定位為人學(xué)?科學(xué)和人學(xué)究竟又該是什么意義上的科學(xué)和人學(xué)?這成了當(dāng)前哲學(xué)本科教材建設(shè)的節(jié)點(diǎn)。長(zhǎng)期以來(lái),由于對(duì)哲學(xué)自身的身份不明或定位不清,哲學(xué)本科教材總是可怕地以一種非哲學(xué)的方式敘說(shuō)著哲學(xué)的問(wèn)題,并直接導(dǎo)致大學(xué)哲學(xué)教育的自我遮蔽、自我解構(gòu)和事與愿違。從人文視野出發(fā),哲學(xué)本科教材的學(xué)科定位應(yīng)該立足于兩個(gè)基本立場(chǎng):一是哲學(xué)不是一般意義的科學(xué);二是哲學(xué)是最高意義的人學(xué)。
[Abstract]:Is philosophy a science or a science? What is the meaning of science and human science? This has become the current philosophical undergraduate teaching material construction node. For a long time, because the identity of philosophy itself is not clear or its orientation is not clear, the teaching materials of philosophy always describe the problems of philosophy in a non-philosophical way, and directly lead to the self-shielding of college philosophy education. Self-deconstruction and counterproductive. From the perspective of humanities, the subject orientation of philosophy undergraduate teaching materials should be based on two basic standpoints: one is that philosophy is not a science of general meaning, the other is that philosophy is the highest meaning of human studies.
【作者單位】： 湖北大學(xué)哲學(xué)學(xué)院;湖北大學(xué)高等人文研究院;
【基金】：湖北省教研項(xiàng)目“人文視野下哲學(xué)本科教材改革與實(shí)踐研究”成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G642.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 黃g，

本文編號(hào)：2401167