【摘要】：目前,各高校對(duì)于開展雙語(yǔ)教學(xué)的熱情不斷高漲,其根本目的是能夠讓學(xué)生在學(xué)習(xí)課程過(guò)程中可同時(shí)掌握兩種不同的語(yǔ)言能力。但是,由于對(duì)于雙語(yǔ)教學(xué)的過(guò)程與效果缺乏有效的評(píng)價(jià)體系,造成國(guó)內(nèi)大多數(shù)高校的雙語(yǔ)教學(xué)現(xiàn)狀與教學(xué)目標(biāo)嚴(yán)重脫節(jié)。如何讓評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果對(duì)后續(xù)的雙語(yǔ)教學(xué)產(chǎn)生較好的推動(dòng)作用顯得非常重要。 論文主要研究如何采取有效的定量評(píng)價(jià)和定性評(píng)價(jià)相結(jié)合的方式來(lái)完善高校雙語(yǔ)教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)體系。由于幾乎所有高校在雙語(yǔ)教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)方面采用定性評(píng)價(jià)方式,往往得到的是模棱兩可的評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果的問(wèn)題,故本文在模糊數(shù)學(xué)領(lǐng)域的模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)高校雙語(yǔ)教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)中的模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)算法進(jìn)行深入研究。在模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法的基本原理和核心因素的基礎(chǔ)上,將模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法與教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)相結(jié)合,對(duì)各主要因素進(jìn)行構(gòu)建,得出指標(biāo)、評(píng)語(yǔ)、權(quán)重、隸屬函數(shù)、評(píng)價(jià)過(guò)程等五位一體的教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)體系。評(píng)價(jià)體系的實(shí)現(xiàn)是為模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)體系在雙語(yǔ)教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用算法鋪墊的,論文便進(jìn)一步依托模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法,選擇SG大學(xué)作為案例,構(gòu)建適合于計(jì)算機(jī)系統(tǒng)應(yīng)用的定量與定性綜合的評(píng)價(jià)算法。 通過(guò)SG大學(xué)在改進(jìn)雙語(yǔ)教學(xué)策略的前后兩個(gè)年度的具體評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果進(jìn)行分析,驗(yàn)證了模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法在高校雙語(yǔ)評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)中的應(yīng)用效果,對(duì)雙語(yǔ)教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)的算法進(jìn)行了設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)現(xiàn),得出模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法的有效性。一方面,促進(jìn)高校雙語(yǔ)教學(xué)系統(tǒng)能夠以整合的方式來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)資源的有效利用,增強(qiáng)教學(xué)評(píng)價(jià)的水平和效果。另一方面,對(duì)不斷優(yōu)化高校雙語(yǔ)教學(xué),持續(xù)推進(jìn)此類教學(xué)的快速健康發(fā)展具有重要的意義。
[Abstract]:At present, the enthusiasm for bilingual teaching in colleges and universities is rising, and its fundamental purpose is to enable students to master two different language abilities in the course of learning. However, due to the lack of an effective evaluation system for the process and effect of bilingual teaching, the present situation of bilingual teaching in most colleges and universities in China is seriously disconnected from the teaching objectives. It is very important to make the evaluation results promote bilingual teaching. This paper mainly studies how to improve the evaluation system of bilingual teaching in colleges and universities by combining quantitative evaluation with qualitative evaluation. Because almost all colleges and universities adopt the qualitative evaluation method in bilingual teaching evaluation, they often get the problem of ambiguous evaluation results, so this paper is based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in the field of fuzzy mathematics. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation algorithm of bilingual teaching evaluation system in colleges and universities is studied. On the basis of the basic principle and core factors of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, combining the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method with the teaching evaluation method, the main factors are constructed, and the indexes, comments, weights, membership functions are obtained. Evaluation process and other five-in-one teaching evaluation system. The realization of the evaluation system is to pave the way for the application of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system in bilingual teaching evaluation. The paper further relies on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and chooses SG University as a case study. A quantitative and qualitative evaluation algorithm suitable for computer system application is constructed. Through the analysis of the concrete evaluation results of SG University in two years before and after improving the bilingual teaching strategy, the application effect of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in the bilingual evaluation system of colleges and universities is verified. The algorithm of bilingual teaching evaluation is designed and implemented, and the effectiveness of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is obtained. On the one hand, promoting bilingual teaching system in colleges and universities can realize the effective utilization of resources and enhance the level and effect of teaching evaluation. On the other hand, it is of great significance to optimize bilingual teaching and promote the rapid and healthy development of this kind of teaching.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G642

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 伍代勇;劉兵兵;;模糊層次分析法在隊(duì)員選拔中的應(yīng)用[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2010年01期

2 方金生;;模糊層次分析法在區(qū)域開發(fā)環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)與管理;2009年09期

3 馬肇興;魏法杰;;一種構(gòu)造設(shè)計(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)矩陣的簡(jiǎn)化方法[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

4 盧震;;基于模糊層次分析法的軍隊(duì)專業(yè)技術(shù)人才考評(píng)[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

5 馬風(fēng)才,張群;模糊綜合評(píng)判在鋼鐵企業(yè)技術(shù)素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年06期

6 李培均;章澤英;陳浩;;強(qiáng)化質(zhì)量意識(shí) 提高教學(xué)質(zhì)量[J];北京教育(高教版);2006年Z1期

7 王曉梅;張桂花;;碩士研究生培養(yǎng)質(zhì)量保障體系的構(gòu)建與評(píng)價(jià)[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2010年03期

8 陳守煜;工程可變模糊集理論與模型——模糊水文水資源學(xué)數(shù)學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[J];大連理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

9 趙自強(qiáng);熊筱燕;;基于模糊數(shù)學(xué)的高等學(xué)校財(cái)務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)模型研究[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年08期

10 黃曉放;淺論課堂教學(xué)改革[J];交通高教研究;1999年S1期

，

本文編號(hào)：2320737