本文選題：心理健康 + 自我對話��； 參考：《高等教育研究》2016年10期

【摘要】：采用自我對話量表考察了366名大學(xué)生不同類型自我對話(自我批判、自我激勵(lì)、自我管理和社會評價(jià))的使用頻率,以及不同類型的自我對話對大學(xué)生焦慮心理和沖動性行為傾向的影響模式。結(jié)果表明:大學(xué)生使用自我管理型自我對話的頻率最高,其次是社會評價(jià)型自我對話,使用自我批判型或自我激勵(lì)型自我對話的頻率較低;自我管理型和自我激勵(lì)型自我對話均負(fù)向預(yù)測狀態(tài)和特質(zhì)焦慮,自我批判型自我對話正向預(yù)測狀態(tài)和特質(zhì)焦慮;自我批判型自我對話正向預(yù)測運(yùn)動沖動性和無計(jì)劃沖動性,自我激勵(lì)型自我對話負(fù)向預(yù)測運(yùn)動沖動性、認(rèn)知沖動性和無計(jì)劃沖動性。
[Abstract]:The frequency of self-dialogue (self-criticism, self-motivation, self-management and social evaluation) was investigated in 366 college students with self-dialogue scale. And the influence patterns of different self-dialogues on anxiety and impulsive behavior tendency of college students. The results showed that the frequency of self-managed self-dialogue was the highest, followed by social evaluation self-dialogue, and the frequency of self-critical or self-motivated self-dialogue was lower. Self-managed and self-motivated self-dialogue negatively predicted state and trait anxiety, self-critical self-dialogue positively predicted motor impulsiveness and unplanned impulsiveness, and self-critical self-dialogue positively predicted motor impulsiveness and unplanned impulsiveness. Self-motivated self-dialogue negatively predicts motor impulsiveness, cognitive impulsiveness and unplanned impulsiveness.
【作者單位】： 華中科技大學(xué)教育科學(xué)研究院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金(教育學(xué))青年項(xiàng)目(CBA150153)
【分類號】：G444

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李林W，

本文編號：1977450