發(fā)布時間：2018-03-26 21:39

  本文選題：篇章　切入點：篇章銜接　出處：《北京語言大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文以前人對外漢語篇章語言學(xué)理論、篇章習(xí)得研究成果以及寫作教學(xué)、篇章教學(xué)等研究為指導(dǎo),采用偏誤分析、數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計、定性與定量相結(jié)合的方法,通過對大量美國中高年級漢語作為第二語言學(xué)習(xí)者的作文材料進行分析,考察其作文中指稱方法的運用情況,以及各種指稱手段的習(xí)得順序。文章以銜接力能力的強弱為標準,選取了四種指稱方式,它們分別是:零形代詞、代詞、指示語(單用)、指示成分+話語名詞。在選取研究語料時,選取了美國大學(xué)生為研究被試,均為漢語作為第二語言學(xué)習(xí)者,研究中選取了能代表漢語中、高級學(xué)習(xí)者的哈佛大學(xué)(包括耶魯大學(xué)、芝加哥大學(xué)、麻省理工學(xué)院等其他學(xué)校學(xué)生,均在哈佛修中文課)的三、五兩個年級學(xué)生的書面語作文材料,重點考察中高級漢語學(xué)習(xí)者習(xí)得以上四種銜接手段時,是否存在一定的順序,并嘗試解釋所得結(jié)論。通過統(tǒng)計分析與計算,我們得出了以下初步的結(jié)論:(1)三、五年級在零形代詞、指示語方面的偏誤頻次具有顯著差異,在人稱代詞指稱方面,三、五年級的偏誤頻次接近顯著差異,且三年級的錯誤頻次仍多于五年級;(2)在三年級內(nèi)部,零形代詞、人稱代詞、指示語方面的錯誤頻次依次增加,并表現(xiàn)出明顯差異,五年級內(nèi)部表現(xiàn)出同樣的趨勢;(3)在人稱代詞、指示語的語體風(fēng)格錯誤方面,三、五年級學(xué)生的錯誤頻次沒有顯著差異,也就是說,中高年級的漢語學(xué)習(xí)者均存在著指示語語體風(fēng)格的偏誤類型,不過值得注意的是,在絕對數(shù)量上,只有這一項是五年級的偏誤頻次高于三年級。后文討論并嘗試解釋了出現(xiàn)這種情況的原因,并在文章的最后比對了中美對外漢語教材各一套,考察以上銜接手段在各種教材中呈現(xiàn)方式、呈現(xiàn)量的多少,以及各自的講練特點,并希望就此為教材編寫、課程設(shè)計提供一些參考意見。
[Abstract]:Under the guidance of the previous researches on text linguistics theory, text acquisition, writing teaching and text teaching, this paper adopts the methods of error analysis, data statistics, qualitative and quantitative analysis, and so on. Based on the analysis of a large number of compositions of senior Chinese as a second language learner in the United States, this paper investigates the usage of referential methods in their compositions and the acquisition order of various referential devices. Four kinds of referential methods are selected, they are zero pronoun, pronoun, deixis (single use, demonstrative component discourse noun). All are Chinese as second language learners. In the study, three students from Harvard University (including Yale University, the University of Chicago, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, etc.) who can represent advanced Chinese learners, took Chinese classes at Harvard. The written composition materials of the fifth and second graders, focusing on whether there is a certain order in the acquisition of the above four cohesive devices by middle and advanced Chinese learners, and trying to explain the conclusions, through statistical analysis and calculation. We draw the following preliminary conclusions: third grade, fifth grade has significant difference in the frequency of errors in zero form pronoun, and in personal pronoun reference, the frequency of third and fifth grade errors is close to significant difference. Moreover, the frequency of errors in grade 3 is still higher than that in grade 5 (2) within grade 3, the frequency of errors in zero-shaped pronouns, personal pronouns and deixis increases in turn, and there are obvious differences, while in grade 5 there is a similar trend in personal pronouns. In terms of stylistic errors in deixis, there is no significant difference in the frequency of errors among the third and fifth graders, that is to say, Chinese learners in middle and high grades all have errors in the style of deixis, but it is worth noting that, In absolute terms, only this item is the fifth grade with a higher frequency of errors than the third grade. Later on, we discuss and try to explain the reasons for this situation, and at the end of the article, we compare one set of Chinese teaching materials for China and the United States as a foreign language. This paper examines the above cohesive devices in various textbooks, the amount of presentation, as well as each of the characteristics of practice, and hope to provide some reference for the compilation of textbooks and curriculum design.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京語言大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：H195

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 舒曉谷,彭宣維;五種語篇信息理論模式述評[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1997年01期

2 成方志,馬秀玲;漢語的語篇功能[J];濱州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年03期

3 杜欣;;留學(xué)生寫作教學(xué)中的控制性訓(xùn)練原則[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2006年03期

4 鄭貴友;漢語篇章分析的興起與發(fā)展[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2005年05期

5 楊春;英語國家學(xué)生初級漢語語篇照應(yīng)偏誤考察[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2004年03期

6 彭小川;關(guān)于對外漢語語篇教學(xué)的新思考[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2004年02期

7 蔣平;零形回指現(xiàn)象考察[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2004年03期

8 田然;現(xiàn)代漢語敘事語篇中NP的省略[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2003年06期

9 田然;近二十年漢語語篇研究述評[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2005年01期

10 吳平;從學(xué)習(xí)策略到對外漢語寫作教學(xué)[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1999年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 曾常紅;漢語論辯體語篇分析[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 左嵐;中學(xué)生漢語母語書面表達中銜接連貫偏誤考察及教學(xué)建議[D];華中師范大學(xué);2006年

2 霍靜宇;日本學(xué)生初級漢語敘述體語篇銜接手段問題研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1669743