基于英語(yǔ)課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的海口市中考英語(yǔ)試卷效度研究
[Abstract]:Based on the communicative language test theory, validity theory and English Curriculum Standard for compulsory Education (hereinafter referred to as the English Curriculum Standard), this study aims to explore the validity of the English Test in Haikou Middle School examination. On the basis of reviewing the previous studies at home and abroad, this study summarizes the basis for evaluating the content validity and construction validity of the test, and according to the training objectives put forward in the English Curriculum Standards. This paper investigates the present situation of the content validity and structure validity of the English test paper in Haikou City from 2011 to 2014, gives an evaluation, and puts forward some suggestions for improving the existing problems. This study adopts four research methods: first, literature method, collect the theoretical and empirical research on language testing and validity of language testing at home and abroad, and sort it out, analyze it, integrate it and classify it. In order to provide strong theoretical support and empirical research paradigm for this study; Secondly, the contrastive analysis method is used to analyze the four papers selected from Haikou city according to the validity research method provided by predecessors, in order to investigate the content validity and construction validity of the test paper; Third, the method of education statistics, the analysis of the data obtained from the analysis of the test paper, with intuitive data as an argument; Fourthly, through interviews with middle school English teachers, we can understand the teachers' thoughts on the validity of English test, so as to find out the reasons for the validity problems. The results of the investigation and analysis show that the English test of Haikou City from 2011 to 2014 can select representative test contents which accord with the students' level, at the same time, it can provide a clear scoring standard, and give guidance to students before the test. These have played a positive role in ensuring the validity of the test. The problems existing in the validity of the four papers investigated are as follows: the content of the test is not relevant to the objective of the test, the purpose of the test is unclear, the purpose of the test is not clear; The negative anti-dialing effect of the test will lead to the failure of junior middle school English teaching to achieve the goal of "cultivating students' comprehensive language use ability". There are three fundamental reasons for the validity of the 2011-2014 Middle School English Test in Haikou City: first, Haikou Middle School English teachers' erroneous teaching concept of "examination-oriented teaching"; Second, Haikou junior high school English teaching failed to meet the objectives of CET-5; thirdly, the purpose of English test in Haikou Middle School examination is not clear. In view of the problems existing in the papers investigated and the causes of the problems, this study puts forward three suggestions for improvement: first, to train the test and evaluation basic knowledge and basic skills of middle school English teachers by using the theoretical resources of education in colleges and universities; Second, strengthen the training of the test theory for the experts, and thirdly, carry out the routine research and quality analysis of the English test paper quality of the middle school entrance examination.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:海南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:G633.41
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 ;2005年秋季期中教學(xué)質(zhì)量監(jiān)測(cè)小學(xué)三年級(jí)英語(yǔ)試卷(英文)[J];山東師范大學(xué)外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(基礎(chǔ)英語(yǔ)教育);2006年02期
2 張?jiān)品?;初中英語(yǔ)試卷人性化設(shè)計(jì)思考[J];江蘇教育研究;2008年24期
3 任玉峰;;甘南州2012年初中畢業(yè)暨高中階段學(xué)校招生考試英語(yǔ)試卷質(zhì)量分析[J];學(xué)周刊;2013年26期
4 宗愛(ài)智 ,方新生;對(duì)我校今年提前招生英語(yǔ)試卷的分析[J];鎮(zhèn)江師專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1986年04期
5 常健;;教會(huì)學(xué)生如何做英語(yǔ)試卷分析[J];語(yǔ)數(shù)外學(xué)習(xí)(英語(yǔ)教育);2013年12期
6 ;成都市2004—2005學(xué)年度上學(xué)期期末調(diào)研測(cè)試小學(xué)四年級(jí)英語(yǔ)試卷[J];中小學(xué)外語(yǔ)教學(xué)(小學(xué)篇);2005年06期
7 郭麗娜;;淺談?dòng)⒄Z(yǔ)試卷的講評(píng)[J];山東教育(中學(xué)刊);2006年26期
8 宋俊青;;三年級(jí)第二 單元英語(yǔ)試卷[J];小學(xué)生必讀(中年級(jí)版);2007年04期
9 王建平;;2007~2008學(xué)年度第一學(xué)期六年級(jí)調(diào)研英語(yǔ)試卷[J];中小學(xué)外語(yǔ)教學(xué)(小學(xué)篇);2008年05期
10 陳順;;破譯“首字母”之迷[J];初中生輔導(dǎo);2008年31期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條
1 胡舒;;如何上好高中英語(yǔ)試卷講評(píng)課[A];中華教育理論與實(shí)踐科研論文成果選編(第六卷)[C];2013年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前7條
1 本報(bào)記者 原琳;中考英語(yǔ)試卷評(píng)析[N];華夏時(shí)報(bào);2003年
2 羅青山 蒼溪縣五龍中學(xué);小議英語(yǔ)試卷的講評(píng)[N];廣元日?qǐng)?bào);2010年
3 本報(bào)記者 王柏玲;母語(yǔ)沒(méi)學(xué)好,外語(yǔ)犯的錯(cuò)?[N];文匯報(bào);2013年
4 凱文;體驗(yàn)奧組委考試[N];市場(chǎng)報(bào);2002年
5 初霞;注重能力考查 體現(xiàn)基礎(chǔ)性全面性[N];哈爾濱日?qǐng)?bào);2006年
6 北京市西城區(qū)教研中心 陳平興;五個(gè)特點(diǎn) 五點(diǎn)啟示[N];中國(guó)教育報(bào);2002年
7 記者 高愛(ài)華 李欣 姜健;心態(tài)平和迎戰(zhàn)2005中考[N];牡丹江日?qǐng)?bào);2005年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 冀超君;基于英語(yǔ)課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的?谑兄锌加⒄Z(yǔ)試卷效度研究[D];海南師范大學(xué);2015年
2 廖春麗;福建省中考英語(yǔ)試卷的預(yù)測(cè)效度研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2013年
3 李保麗;中國(guó)高考英語(yǔ)試卷中的性別研究[D];重慶師范大學(xué);2014年
4 趙立榮;任務(wù)型教學(xué)在高中英語(yǔ)試卷講評(píng)中的應(yīng)用[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2012年
5 湯佳清;初三英語(yǔ)試卷講評(píng)課現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查與分析[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年
6 顧秀楠;陜西省自主命題前后高考英語(yǔ)試卷內(nèi)容效度對(duì)比研究[D];西北大學(xué);2012年
7 蘇惠芬;湖北省黃岡市黃州區(qū)2002年中考英語(yǔ)試卷分析[D];華中師范大學(xué);2003年
8 馬莉萍;英語(yǔ)試卷講評(píng)課有效教學(xué)策略初探[D];上海師范大學(xué);2013年
9 陳婷;高中英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法教學(xué)現(xiàn)狀分析及反思[D];華中師范大學(xué);2006年
10 費(fèi)瑤;初中英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法教學(xué)中學(xué)習(xí)者假設(shè)修正意識(shí)的培養(yǎng)[D];上海師范大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號(hào):2455675
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/2455675.html