發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-19 21:00

【摘要】：儒家德育思想是我國自古代一直流傳至今的優(yōu)秀文化遺產(chǎn),是我國古代無數(shù)儒家學(xué)者思想的結(jié)晶,受到了來自世界各地學(xué)者的追捧和研究。然而,當(dāng)前學(xué)術(shù)界更多地是從儒家德育思想對(duì)當(dāng)前學(xué)校德育工作的啟示入手,而很少從德育評(píng)價(jià)的角度來挖掘儒家思想中的精髓之處。而筆者通過研究發(fā)現(xiàn),儒家思想中其實(shí)蘊(yùn)含著豐富的德育評(píng)價(jià)思想,而這些評(píng)價(jià)思想為解決當(dāng)前思想政治教育學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)中存在的問題提供了新的思路和方法,進(jìn)一步補(bǔ)充、完善了當(dāng)前思想政治教育學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)體系。本文通過研究想要達(dá)到兩大目標(biāo)：一方面總結(jié)儒家德育思想中關(guān)于評(píng)價(jià)的思想,儒家德育思想中蘊(yùn)含著豐富的評(píng)價(jià)思想,但是學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)于這一內(nèi)容的研究比較少,通過本文的研究,筆者希望能夠整理出儒家德育思想中關(guān)于評(píng)價(jià)的內(nèi)容,來彌補(bǔ)這一方面研究的不足；另一方面批判性繼承儒家德育評(píng)價(jià)思想中的合理內(nèi)容,并從現(xiàn)代視角對(duì)其進(jìn)行解讀,賦予其新的時(shí)代內(nèi)容,從而為當(dāng)前思想政治課學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)體系的完善提供新的思路。針對(duì)以上需要解決的兩大問題,本文的研究內(nèi)容分為三大部分,第一部分從評(píng)價(jià)目標(biāo)、評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、評(píng)價(jià)方法三方面總結(jié)了儒家思想中關(guān)于評(píng)價(jià)的內(nèi)容,并試圖找到這三方面之間的聯(lián)系和區(qū)別。評(píng)價(jià)目標(biāo)中的“君子人格”是儒家德育評(píng)價(jià)活動(dòng)圍繞的出發(fā)點(diǎn)和落腳點(diǎn),而“君子不器”是實(shí)現(xiàn)君子人格的基礎(chǔ),“玉的人格”是“君子人格”的形象化表述,是“君子不器”的進(jìn)一步升華。評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)則是評(píng)價(jià)過程中圍繞著評(píng)價(jià)目標(biāo)提出的對(duì)于被評(píng)者的要求,其中總結(jié)的義利觀、己群觀、忠恕觀、榮辱觀都是考察君子人格非常重要的幾個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)要求。而評(píng)價(jià)方法則是指在評(píng)價(jià)過程中采取何種方法進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),這里總結(jié)了反身自省、言行一致、因材施“評(píng)”、謹(jǐn)慎評(píng)人四種儒家比較典型的評(píng)價(jià)方法。第二部分從傳統(tǒng)儒家思想缺失的角度,來審視當(dāng)前中學(xué)思想政治課學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)存在的問題,總結(jié)了評(píng)價(jià)要求較為零散,評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)模糊,評(píng)價(jià)主體不全面,思想政治課學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)與學(xué)生綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)中的思想品德評(píng)價(jià)的聯(lián)系較少等問題。第三部分,將儒家思想中關(guān)于評(píng)價(jià)的內(nèi)容引入到高中思想政治課學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)中,在學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)中開發(fā)其價(jià)值,以高中思想政治課為載體,探討儒家德育評(píng)價(jià)思想如何能夠寓于思想政治課學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)之中,補(bǔ)充完善了思想政治課學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)體系,為進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)提供了新的思路和方法。
[Abstract]:Confucian moral education is an outstanding cultural heritage which has been handed down since ancient times in China. It is the crystallization of countless Confucian scholars in ancient China and has been sought after and studied by scholars from all over the world. However, the current academic circles begin with the enlightenment of the Confucian moral education to the current school moral education work, and seldom excavate the essence of the Confucian thought from the angle of moral education evaluation. The author finds that the Confucian thought actually contains rich moral education evaluation thought, and these evaluation thoughts provide new ideas and methods for solving the problems existing in the students' evaluation of ideological and political education at present. Improved the current ideological and political education student evaluation system. On the one hand, the thesis summarizes the thought of evaluation in the Confucian moral education thought, which contains rich evaluation thought, but the academic research on this content is relatively few. Through the study of this paper, the author hopes to sort out the Confucian moral education thought about the content of evaluation, to make up for the lack of research in this area; On the other hand, it critically inherits the reasonable content in the Confucian moral education evaluation thought, and interprets it from the modern angle of view, endows it with the new era content, thus provides the new thought for the current ideological and political course student appraisal system consummation. In view of the two problems mentioned above, the research content of this paper is divided into three parts. The first part summarizes the contents of the Confucian thought on evaluation from three aspects: the evaluation goal, the evaluation standard and the evaluation method. And tries to find the connection and the difference between these three aspects. The "gentleman personality" in the evaluation goal is the starting point and the foothold of the Confucian moral education evaluation activity, and "the gentleman does not have the instrument" is the foundation of realizing the gentleman personality, "the jade personality" is the image expression of the "gentleman personality". It is the further sublimation of Gentleman. The evaluation standard is the requirement for the person to be evaluated around the evaluation goal in the process of evaluation, among which the summary of the view of justice and benefit, oneself and group, loyalty and forgiveness, honor and disgrace are the several standard requirements which are very important to investigate the personality of the gentleman. The evaluation method refers to what method should be adopted in the process of evaluation. This paper summarizes four typical Confucian evaluation methods, such as reflexive introspection, consistent words and deeds, and careful evaluation of people. In the second part, from the point of view of the lack of the traditional Confucian thought, it examines the problems existing in the evaluation of the students in the ideological and political course of middle school, summarizes the evaluation requirements are scattered, the evaluation index is vague, and the evaluation subject is not comprehensive. There is little connection between the students' evaluation of ideological and political course and the evaluation of students' comprehensive quality. In the third part, the content of the Confucian thought about the evaluation is introduced into the high school ideological and political course student evaluation, and the value is developed in the student evaluation, taking the high school ideological and political course as the carrier, This paper probes into how the Confucian moral education evaluation thought can be embedded in the students' evaluation of ideological and political courses, complements and perfects the evaluation system of ideological and political students, and provides a new way of thinking and method for the evaluation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G633.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 袁銀傳;郭強(qiáng);;儒家德育思想的深度理論解讀與當(dāng)代意義闡釋——評(píng)《儒家德育學(xué)說論綱》[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

2 孫祥軍;;儒家德育思想對(duì)高校德育的啟示[J];山東省青年管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

3 張之方;;儒家德育思想對(duì)我國學(xué)校德育工作的啟示[J];安徽電子信息職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

4 王大賢;;儒家德育基本方法和當(dāng)前高校德育工作[J];安徽理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

5 李佩蕓;;儒家德育思想在高校德育中的現(xiàn)實(shí)價(jià)值[J];四川省衛(wèi)生管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

6 郭彩霞;;論儒家德育思想對(duì)現(xiàn)代德育工作的價(jià)值[J];世紀(jì)橋;2010年05期

7 宋偉;;儒家德育思想對(duì)學(xué)校德育的價(jià)值[J];思想政治教育研究;2010年03期

8 孫彩云;;淺談儒家德育思想對(duì)當(dāng)代學(xué)校德育的價(jià)值[J];學(xué)理論;2012年17期

9 謝曉軍;;論儒家德育思想及對(duì)當(dāng)代學(xué)校德育的啟示[J];現(xiàn)代企業(yè)教育;2011年24期

10 馮雪峰;儒家德育傳統(tǒng)與學(xué)校德育工作[J];安徽教育;2002年15期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 金林祥;;論我國儒家德育的優(yōu)良傳統(tǒng)[A];紀(jì)念《教育史研究》創(chuàng)刊二十周年論文集（3）——中國教育制度史研究[C];2009年

2 梅汝莉;;儒家德育思想的現(xiàn)代價(jià)值[A];紀(jì)念《教育史研究》創(chuàng)刊二十周年論文集（2）——中國教育思想史與人物研究[C];2009年

3 黃書光;;儒家德育范式的理論建構(gòu)[A];2008年度上海市社會(huì)科學(xué)界第六屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)文集（哲學(xué)·歷史·文學(xué)學(xué)科卷）[C];2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 程銘莉;論儒家德育思想對(duì)我國當(dāng)代學(xué)校德育的價(jià)值[D];東北師范大學(xué);2005年

2 安娜;儒學(xué)思想對(duì)中學(xué)德育的啟示探究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2015年

3 路曇曇;儒家德育思想對(duì)高校思想政治教育的借鑒價(jià)值研究[D];河北科技大學(xué);2014年

4 劉春萌;儒家德育思想對(duì)當(dāng)前高校德育的借鑒意義[D];河北師范大學(xué);2015年

5 王晶;儒家德育思想對(duì)社會(huì)主義先進(jìn)文化建設(shè)的啟示[D];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

6 朱敏達(dá);儒家德育思想在當(dāng)代高校思想政治教育中的價(jià)值研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2016年

7 賈禮娜;儒家德育思想對(duì)思想政治課學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)的啟示[D];南京師范大學(xué);2015年

8 汪三汝;先秦儒家德育智慧及其現(xiàn)代啟示[D];暨南大學(xué);2011年

9 宋偉;儒家德育思想對(duì)當(dāng)代青少年德育工作的價(jià)值研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2007年

10 李婉露;儒家德育思想與我國當(dāng)代高校德育研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2387445