【摘要】：議論文是人類理性智慧的成果和結(jié)晶。議論文寫作是中學(xué)語文作文教學(xué)的主要內(nèi)容,也是信息時(shí)代人們表明態(tài)度、發(fā)表主張、傳遞思想的重要載體。隨著其在社會生活各個(gè)領(lǐng)域中的作用日益顯現(xiàn),人們對議論文寫作能力和寫作素養(yǎng)提出了更高的要求。然而,反觀目前的議論文寫作現(xiàn)狀,假話、空話、套話泛濫之余,模式化、八股化的風(fēng)氣也極為盛行,扭轉(zhuǎn)這種局面已是當(dāng)務(wù)之急。追根溯源,其原因還在于人們對于議論文、議論文寫作存在著一些認(rèn)知偏差。因此,從指導(dǎo)議論文寫作實(shí)踐的議論文觀、議論文寫作觀著手,將其進(jìn)行一番相對全面系統(tǒng)的梳理,對于糾正人們的認(rèn)知偏差以及指導(dǎo)議論文寫作和議論文寫作教學(xué)實(shí)踐都十分必要。本文在收集了大量文獻(xiàn)資料的基礎(chǔ)上,選擇梁啟超、葉圣陶、夏丐尊、孫紹振、馬正平、潘新和等十六位有代表性的現(xiàn)代語文教育家、學(xué)者的議論文觀、議論文寫作觀,分別從動力、目的、性質(zhì)、類別、說理、思維、受眾七個(gè)方面出發(fā),各有側(cè)重地對其進(jìn)行了梳理和述評。同時(shí),通過分析和比較其異同點(diǎn),在總結(jié)前人觀點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上,試圖提出幾點(diǎn)自己的認(rèn)識和看法,以期其能深化人們對于議論文、議論文寫作的了解和認(rèn)識,對議論文寫作和議論文寫作教學(xué)實(shí)踐有所助益。
[Abstract]:Argumentation is the fruit and crystallization of human rational wisdom. Argumentative writing is the main content of Chinese composition teaching in middle school, and it is also an important carrier for people to express their attitude, express their opinions and convey their thoughts in the information age. With its role in various fields of social life, people put forward higher requirements for argumentative writing ability and writing literacy. However, the current situation of argumentative writing, falsehood, empty talk, platitudes, patterns and stereotyping are also prevailing, so it is urgent to reverse this situation. The reason lies in the cognitive bias of argumentation and argumentative writing. Therefore, starting from the argumentative viewpoint which guides the practice of argumentative writing and argumentative writing view, it is comparatively comprehensive and systematic to sort it out. It is necessary to correct people's cognitive bias and guide the teaching practice of argumentative writing and argumentative writing. On the basis of collecting a great deal of literature, this paper chooses 16 representative modern Chinese educationalists and scholars, such as Liang Qichao, Ye Shengtao, Xia Gaozun, Sun Shaozhen, Ma Zhengping, Pan Xinhe, and so on, as well as their argumentation and argumentative writing views. Respectively from the motive force, the purpose, the nature, the category, the reasoning, the thought, the audience seven aspects, respectively has carried on the combing and the commentary emphatically to it. At the same time, through the analysis and comparison of its similarities and differences, on the basis of summarizing the previous views, this paper tries to put forward some of its own understanding and views in order to deepen people's understanding and understanding of argumentation and argumentative writing. It is helpful to the teaching practice of argumentative writing and argumentative writing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G633.34

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 于水;;議論文文體學(xué)論綱[J];佳木斯教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1987年03期

2 卓立子;;議論文寫作教學(xué)的目標(biāo)走向[J];語文教學(xué)與研究;2007年22期

3 尹繼東;;對“議論文三要素”弊害的反思與探討[J];語文建設(shè);2012年11期

4 潘新和;;現(xiàn)代名家論辨文旨趣觀述評[J];語文建設(shè);2013年01期

5 周媛;;高中語文議論文寫作有效教學(xué)初探[J];新課程導(dǎo)學(xué);2013年30期

6 陳軍;;論辯型議論文部分[J];語文教學(xué)通訊;1987年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 肖牡;高中生議論文寫作有效教學(xué)初探[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2011年

2 及葳;中學(xué)議論文作文教學(xué)中思維能力的培養(yǎng)[D];首都師范大學(xué);2008年

3 臧克娟;高中議論文寫作教學(xué)現(xiàn)狀與改革研究[D];重慶師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2212584