本文選題：IGCSE + Chemistry��； 參考：《遼寧師范大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：論文基于比較教育學等理論,以最新版的英國及國際學�；瘜W教材IGCSE Chemistry及我國人教版高中化學教材《必修1》、《必修2》為研究對象,運用文獻法、內容分析法及比較分析法等研究方法,從課程標準的性質、內容標準及評價標準角度分析兩套教材的設計理念,明確教材設計依據(jù)。對英國的學制及“普通中等教育證書(GCSE)”、“GCSE”與“IGCSE”的關系等內容進行了簡要分析研究。分別就教材體系結構、內容設置、實驗部分和教材的欄目、習題及插圖等呈現(xiàn)方式以及典型知識點,從宏觀、微觀兩方面對兩國教材進行了比較分析,對我國高中化學教材編制和使用提出了建議。研究表明,相較我國人教版化學必修教材,英國IGCSE Chemistry教材體系結構更為細致完整,教材后置部分工具性較為明顯;教材內容設置上知識覆蓋面較廣,側重體現(xiàn)化學與生活、經濟、社會及自然環(huán)境的聯(lián)系,滲透化學與其他學科交融的思想;實驗部分較為系統(tǒng)全面,側重實驗技能的應用,注重實驗與生產生活的聯(lián)系;教材呈現(xiàn)方面,欄目設置簡略,利用率高,習題設置難易度區(qū)別較大,插圖形式豐富、數(shù)量較大、設計精美。比較分析兩國教材的差異,對我國今后化學教材的編制具有一定借鑒意義。
[Abstract]:Based on the theory of comparative education, this paper takes IGCSE Chemistry, the latest edition of English and international school chemistry textbooks, and the senior high school chemistry textbooks < required 1 > and < compulsory 2 > > as the research objects, and applies the literature method.This paper analyzes the design concepts of the two sets of textbooks from the aspects of the nature of curriculum standards, content standards and evaluation standards, and clarifies the basis for the design of teaching materials by the methods of content analysis and comparative analysis.The relationship between GCSE and GCSE, GCSE and GCSE in UK is briefly analyzed.This paper makes a comparative analysis of the teaching materials of the two countries from the macro and micro aspects, including the system structure, content setting, experimental part and the column, exercises and illustrations of the teaching materials, as well as the typical knowledge points.Some suggestions are put forward for the compilation and use of chemistry teaching materials in senior high schools in China.The research shows that compared with the required teaching materials of chemistry in China, IGCSE Chemistry textbook system in England is more detailed and complete, the latter part of teaching materials is more instrumental, and the content of teaching materials has a wide coverage of knowledge, emphasizing on the embodiment of chemistry and life.The connection of economy, society and natural environment, the idea of permeating chemistry and other disciplines; the experiment part is systematic and comprehensive, focusing on the application of experimental skills, paying attention to the connection between experiment and production and life.High utilization rate, difficulty in setting exercises, rich illustrations, large quantity and exquisite design.The comparison and analysis of the differences between the two countries' teaching materials can be used for reference in the compilation of chemistry textbooks in China in the future.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G633.8

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陳時見;;比較教育學的概念建構及其現(xiàn)實意義[J];比較教育研究;2013年04期

2 王祖浩;;對我國高中化學課程標準實施和修訂的審視[J];基礎教育課程;2013年Z1期

3 茍莉莉;王后雄;;英國GCSE化學考試的綜合實踐技能評價模式[J];化學教學;2012年06期

4 周開軍;;STSE理念及其與中學化學教學的整合[J];化學教育;2012年01期

5 羅秀玲;黃淡花;;高中生對化學教科書習題的態(tài)度和評價的調查研究[J];化學教育;2011年11期

6 滕e，

本文編號：1749153