本文關(guān)鍵詞：中英數(shù)學(xué)教材有理數(shù)運(yùn)算的比較研究　出處：《杭州師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 中英教材 有理數(shù)運(yùn)算 編排方式 難度 比較研究

【摘要】：隨著基礎(chǔ)教育課程改革的實(shí)施,我國對于課程的研究取得了許多成果,在課程改革中,教材比較研究一直是研究的重點(diǎn)。國內(nèi)關(guān)于國際教材對比的相關(guān)研究較多,但關(guān)于英國教材的相關(guān)研究相對較少,有也多是從整體架構(gòu)或者難度進(jìn)行比較研究。本文選取中國浙教版和英國SMP兩套教材中有關(guān)有理數(shù)運(yùn)算的內(nèi)容進(jìn)行比較研究,希望通過比較研究,了解兩國不同版本教材的各自優(yōu)勢和不足,借鑒SMP教材的優(yōu)勢,為我國中學(xué)數(shù)學(xué)課程中,有關(guān)有理數(shù)運(yùn)算的編寫和改革,提供借鑒和參考。本文結(jié)合Charalambos Y Charalambos等構(gòu)建的教材比較分析框架與常用的難度分析框架,從橫向維度,縱向維度以及難度維度對兩套教材中有關(guān)有理數(shù)運(yùn)算的內(nèi)容進(jìn)行比較研究,橫向維度從背景信息和整體結(jié)構(gòu)展開研究,其中背景信息從“名稱、年級、頁數(shù)”和“課表要求”兩塊研究,整體結(jié)構(gòu)從“知識點(diǎn)及排列順序”和“習(xí)題數(shù)量”兩塊研究;縱向維度分別從有理數(shù)加減法和乘除法的引入、演繹和引出三塊展開研究;難度維度從內(nèi)容廣度、內(nèi)容深度以及習(xí)題難度三個方向展開研究。研究結(jié)果顯示,浙教版重視教師的教,課標(biāo)要求高,編排緊密,知識呈現(xiàn)比較系統(tǒng),難度高于SMP教材;SMP更加重視學(xué)生的學(xué),內(nèi)容呈現(xiàn)方式多樣,教材難度低。
[Abstract]:With the implementation of basic education curriculum reform, China has made many great achievements in curriculum research in the curriculum reform, textbook comparison research has been the focus of the study. A lot of studies on the international comparison of domestic materials, but the research on English textbooks is relatively small, there are also a comparative study from the overall structure or this paper selects the rational China difficulty. Earth and the British SMP two sets of teaching materials in the number of operations content comparative study, hope that through the comparative study, understand their respective advantages and shortcomings of the two different versions of textbooks, reference SMP teaching material advantages, for our country middle school mathematics curriculum, about the operation of rational numbers written and reform, to provide reference and reference. This combination of Charalambos Y Charalambos and other construction materials comparative analysis framework and common difficulty analysis framework, from the horizontal dimension and vertical dimension and The difficulty about rational dimensions of the two sets of textbooks in numbers to compare the contents of research, the horizontal dimension launches the research from the background information and the overall structure, the background information from the "name, grade, number of pages" and "curriculum requirements" two pieces of research, from the overall structure of "knowledge and order" and "exercise number" two on the vertical dimension respectively; from the introduction of the rational number addition and subtraction and multiplication and division, and leads to the three block of deduction; difficulty from the content dimension of breadth, depth and research contents of the difficulty of exercises in three directions. The results showed that Zhejiang for the importance of teachers to teach, curriculum requirements, layout closely, the knowledge representation system, SMP SMP is more difficult than that of textbooks; pay more attention to the students, the presentation of content diversity, the teaching difficulty is low.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：杭州師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G633.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 趙中建;黃丹鳳;;教育改革浪潮中的“指南針”——美國TIMSS研究的特點(diǎn)和影響分析[J];比較教育研究;2008年02期

2 任坤;;有理數(shù)加法的教材分析[J];中小學(xué)教學(xué)研究;2012年06期

，

本文編號：1362947