本文選題：疾病預(yù)防控制機(jī)構(gòu)　切入點(diǎn)：人力資源　出處：《中國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生》2017年07期

【摘要】：目的了解中國(guó)疾控機(jī)構(gòu)人力資源配置的公平性,為促進(jìn)疾控機(jī)構(gòu)人力資源的合理配置提供參考。方法對(duì)2010—2014年中國(guó)疾控機(jī)構(gòu)人力資源狀況進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)描述,應(yīng)用泰爾指數(shù)進(jìn)行配置公平性分析。結(jié)果2010—2014年中國(guó)疾控機(jī)構(gòu)人員總數(shù)、衛(wèi)生技術(shù)人員數(shù)、執(zhí)業(yè)(助理)醫(yī)師數(shù)年均下降率分別為0.4%、0.7%、1.9%,在地區(qū)間和地區(qū)內(nèi)均存在配置不公平現(xiàn)象;三類人員全國(guó)配置的泰爾指數(shù)分別為0.036 4~0.041 3、0.035 8~0.043 0、0.040 5~0.051 2;而在西部地區(qū)其泰爾指數(shù)分別為0.035 9~0.052 7、0.043 5~0.059 7、0.055 4~0.078 4,明顯高于全國(guó)水平,而且其泰爾指數(shù)的貢獻(xiàn)率最高,顯示其公平性最差;從區(qū)域內(nèi)泰爾指數(shù)變化來(lái)看,在東部地區(qū)、西部地區(qū)及全國(guó)范圍,執(zhí)業(yè)(助理)醫(yī)師配置的公平性最差;在中部地區(qū),人員總數(shù)配置的公平性最差。結(jié)論在增加疾控機(jī)構(gòu)人力資源數(shù)量的同時(shí),注重地區(qū)內(nèi)部和地區(qū)間人力資源配置的公平性,最終實(shí)現(xiàn)全國(guó)疾控機(jī)構(gòu)人力資源全面均衡發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Objective to understand the fairness of human resource allocation in Chinese disease control institutions and to provide a reference for the rational allocation of human resources in disease control institutions.Methods the human resource status of China's disease control institutions from 2010 to 2014 was statistically described, and the allocation fairness was analyzed with the Thiel index.Results from 2010 to 2014, the average annual decline rate of the total number of staff, the number of health technicians and the number of practicing (assistant) doctors in China's disease prevention and control institutions were 0.40.70% and 1.9%, respectively. The distribution was unfair in different regions and regions.The Tyr index of the three types of personnel in the whole country was 0.036 4 / 0.041 / 3 / 0.035 / 8 / 0.043 / 0 / 0.040 / 5 / 0.051 / 2 respectively, while in the western region it was 0.035 9 / 0.052 / 7 0.043 / 70.059 / 0.059 / 0.055 / 4 / 0.078 / 4 respectively, which was obviously higher than the national level, and its contribution rate was the highest, indicating that its fairness was the worst.From the point of view of the change of the Terre index in the region, in the eastern region, the western region and the whole country, the fairness of practicing (assistant) physician allocation is the worst, while in the central region, the fairness of the total staffing is the worst.Conclusion while increasing the number of human resources in disease control and prevention institutions, we should pay attention to the fairness of human resources allocation within and among regions, and finally realize the balanced development of human resources in national disease control institutions.
【作者單位】： 濰坊醫(yī)學(xué)院公共衛(wèi)生與管理學(xué)院健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)警治理協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;國(guó)家衛(wèi)生計(jì)生委衛(wèi)生發(fā)展研究中心;
【基金】：“健康山東”重大社會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)警與治理協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心基金(XT1404001) 山東省社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃研究項(xiàng)目(11CGLZ09) 山東省教學(xué)改革研究項(xiàng)目(2015M206) 濰坊醫(yī)學(xué)院教師進(jìn)修項(xiàng)目
【分類號(hào)】：R197.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 劉波;;新型農(nóng)村合作醫(yī)療基金公平性與效率性研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2012年02期

2 王上銘;;基于泰爾指數(shù)的我國(guó)地區(qū)衛(wèi)生資源分布公平度研究[J];中國(guó)衛(wèi)生經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年03期

3 郝巖;夏文碩;陳曉云;;沈陽(yáng)市新型農(nóng)村合作醫(yī)療公平性實(shí)證分析[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年05期

4 吳欣;許仁丹;葉清麗;;我國(guó)社區(qū)中醫(yī)財(cái)政投入的公平性分析:基于基尼系數(shù)和泰爾指數(shù)視角[J];中國(guó)衛(wèi)生經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年06期

5 鄒欽培;鐘曉妮;鄧晶;何佳桐;李洮庭;付廣建;張燕;;1997~2012年重慶市衛(wèi)生人力資源配置的公平性分析[J];重慶醫(yī)學(xué);2014年09期

6 王安玨;江啟成;吳寧;王麗丹;方桂霞;司磊;;基于泰爾指數(shù)的安徽省新型農(nóng)村合作醫(yī)療政府補(bǔ)助受益公平性分析[J];中國(guó)衛(wèi)生政策研究;2012年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉波;中國(guó)新型農(nóng)村合作醫(yī)療公平性與效率性研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1724725