【摘要】：首先從理論上闡述了OFDI發(fā)生逆向技術(shù)溢出的四階段傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制,并在此基礎(chǔ)上分析綠地、并購以及合資三種不同投資方式對技術(shù)逆向傳導(dǎo)的路徑、程度的不同影響。在理論分析基礎(chǔ)上,利用我國18個(gè)行業(yè)2004~2015年對外直接投資的面板數(shù)據(jù),就我國企業(yè)不同方式OFDI的逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)進(jìn)行長短期分析,并結(jié)合行業(yè)特點(diǎn)考察上述效應(yīng)的行業(yè)差異。實(shí)證研究表明,并購在短期中的效果更優(yōu),而綠地在長期中的技術(shù)提升效應(yīng)更好。合資方式對致力于獲取海外先進(jìn)技術(shù)的OFDI而言是不可取的。同時(shí),第一產(chǎn)業(yè)和第二產(chǎn)業(yè)采用并購、合資等方式能夠產(chǎn)生更顯著的技術(shù)外溢效應(yīng),而服務(wù)行業(yè)采取綠地投資方式效果更好。
[Abstract]:In the first part, the four-stage conduction mechanism of the reverse technology overflow of ODI is described, and the path and degree of the backward conduction of the technology are analyzed based on the analysis of the three different modes of investment. On the basis of the theory analysis, using the panel data of the external direct investment of 18 industries in China from 2004 to 2015, the author makes a long-term analysis on the reverse technology spillover effect of ODI in different ways in our country, and studies the industry difference of the above-mentioned effects in combination with the characteristics of the industry. The empirical study shows that the effect of M & A in the short term is better, and the technology improvement effect of green space in the long term is better. The joint venture is not desirable for ODI, which is committed to the acquisition of advanced technology overseas. At the same time, the first industry and the second industry adopt the way of M & A and joint venture to produce more remarkable technology spillover effect, and the service industry takes the green space investment way effect better.
【作者單位】： 廈門大學(xué)嘉庚學(xué)院國際商務(wù)學(xué)院;
【基金】：2016年福建省中青年教師教育科研項(xiàng)目(社科A類)“福建省金融發(fā)展與貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化”(JAS160779)
【分類號】：F125
，

本文編號：2414410