濫用知情權(quán)的邏輯及展開(kāi)
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-09-14 15:37
【摘要】:在我國(guó)信息公開(kāi)實(shí)踐中,出現(xiàn)了申請(qǐng)人大量申請(qǐng)、反復(fù)申請(qǐng)政府信息公開(kāi)的情形。司法實(shí)踐將此類(lèi)申請(qǐng)行為界定為"濫用政府信息申請(qǐng)權(quán)"或"濫用知情權(quán)",并認(rèn)為此類(lèi)行為構(gòu)成權(quán)利濫用。由于公法上權(quán)利關(guān)系的特殊性和知情權(quán)的復(fù)合性功能,在將發(fā)源于私法領(lǐng)域的禁止權(quán)利濫用原則適用于公法上的知情權(quán)問(wèn)題時(shí),必須對(duì)該原則的適用進(jìn)行嚴(yán)格的范圍界定和規(guī)則限制,通過(guò)對(duì)知情權(quán)行使的原則設(shè)定、濫用權(quán)利行為的類(lèi)型化以及建構(gòu)濫用權(quán)利的測(cè)試標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等途徑,抑制行政機(jī)構(gòu)和司法機(jī)關(guān)適用權(quán)利濫用原則的自由裁量空間,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)知情權(quán)的權(quán)利保障和抑制權(quán)利濫用之間的平衡。
[Abstract]:In the practice of information disclosure in our country, a large number of applicants apply for government information disclosure repeatedly. Judicial practice defines this kind of application as "abusing the right to apply for government information" or "abusing the right to know", and thinks that this kind of behavior constitutes abuse of rights. Because of the particularity of the right relation in public law and the compound function of the right to know, when the principle of prohibiting abuse of right originated in the field of private law is applied to the problem of the right to know in public law, The application of this principle must be strictly defined and restricted, through the setting of the principle of the exercise of the right to know, the typology of the abuse of the right to know, and the construction of the test standard for the abuse of the right, etc. In order to balance the protection of the right to know and the abusing of the right, the discretionary space of applying the principle of abuse of rights to the administrative organs and the judicial organs is restrained, so as to achieve the balance between the right to know and the right to abuse.
【作者單位】: 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D922.1
,
本文編號(hào):2243130
[Abstract]:In the practice of information disclosure in our country, a large number of applicants apply for government information disclosure repeatedly. Judicial practice defines this kind of application as "abusing the right to apply for government information" or "abusing the right to know", and thinks that this kind of behavior constitutes abuse of rights. Because of the particularity of the right relation in public law and the compound function of the right to know, when the principle of prohibiting abuse of right originated in the field of private law is applied to the problem of the right to know in public law, The application of this principle must be strictly defined and restricted, through the setting of the principle of the exercise of the right to know, the typology of the abuse of the right to know, and the construction of the test standard for the abuse of the right, etc. In order to balance the protection of the right to know and the abusing of the right, the discretionary space of applying the principle of abuse of rights to the administrative organs and the judicial organs is restrained, so as to achieve the balance between the right to know and the right to abuse.
【作者單位】: 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D922.1
,
本文編號(hào):2243130
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/chengbenguanlilunwen/2243130.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著