【摘要】：教師在職培訓(xùn)是提高中小學(xué)體育教師專業(yè)素質(zhì)最有效的途徑之一。本文采用比較分析法、問(wèn)卷調(diào)查法、訪談法等研究方法,以蘇州與臺(tái)北兩市中小學(xué)體育教師在職培訓(xùn)為研究對(duì)象,通過(guò)分析兩市中小學(xué)體育教師在職培訓(xùn)的各自特點(diǎn)以及在職培訓(xùn)的組織機(jī)構(gòu)、培訓(xùn)內(nèi)容、培訓(xùn)方式、授課教師、考核與評(píng)價(jià)等方面的異同與優(yōu)劣,從而為提升蘇州市中小學(xué)體育教師在職培訓(xùn)的質(zhì)量和效果提供有益的借鑒。研究結(jié)論如下:(1)兩市被調(diào)查的中小學(xué)體育教師都參加過(guò)在職培訓(xùn),說(shuō)明兩市中小學(xué)體育教師在職培訓(xùn)的普及率較高。(2)兩市都制訂了相應(yīng)的法令法規(guī)來(lái)確保體育教師在職培訓(xùn)的規(guī)范性;蘇州市的法令法規(guī)對(duì)培訓(xùn)的學(xué)時(shí)學(xué)分要求較為詳細(xì),而臺(tái)北市的法令法規(guī)在培訓(xùn)的考核獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)方面要求較為詳細(xì),兩市都需要在不同方面進(jìn)一步完善培訓(xùn)的法令法規(guī)。(3)兩市主要的培訓(xùn)組織機(jī)構(gòu)都是以學(xué)校、教師培訓(xùn)中心(教師研習(xí)中心)與教育局為主,但臺(tái)北市有更多的民間組織機(jī)構(gòu)承擔(dān)教師在職培訓(xùn),這一做法值得蘇州市相關(guān)部門的借鑒。(4)兩市在職培訓(xùn)的經(jīng)費(fèi)大部分是由學(xué)�；蚺嘤�(xùn)主管部門承擔(dān),少數(shù)的培訓(xùn)經(jīng)費(fèi)是由個(gè)人獨(dú)自承擔(dān);臺(tái)北市個(gè)人承擔(dān)的比例高于蘇州市,這對(duì)提高培訓(xùn)的效果是有利的。(5)兩市大多數(shù)中小學(xué)體育教師能認(rèn)識(shí)到在職培訓(xùn)的意義,且期望在培訓(xùn)中能獲得創(chuàng)新的體育教學(xué)知識(shí)與方法;臺(tái)北市中小學(xué)體育教師參加在職培訓(xùn)的內(nèi)部動(dòng)機(jī)要高于蘇州市。(6)蘇州市在職培訓(xùn)時(shí)間主要安排在教師業(yè)余時(shí)間,臺(tái)北市在職培訓(xùn)時(shí)間主要安排在上班時(shí)間;兩市在職培訓(xùn)都以短時(shí)間的集中培訓(xùn)為主,大約為1—3小時(shí)居多;蘇州市體育教師每學(xué)期參加的在職培訓(xùn)的次數(shù)多于臺(tái)北市。(7)兩市在職培訓(xùn)的內(nèi)容主要是教學(xué)方法和體育科專業(yè)知識(shí),這與兩市體育教師期待的培訓(xùn)內(nèi)容相一致;在培訓(xùn)內(nèi)容上,臺(tái)北市增加了民俗傳統(tǒng)體育與當(dāng)下熱點(diǎn)(性平、環(huán)保)等內(nèi)容,這顯得培訓(xùn)內(nèi)容更為豐富。(8)兩市在職培訓(xùn)的主要方式都為專家講座、觀摩名師課堂教學(xué)、教師同儕經(jīng)驗(yàn)分享,并且兩市中小學(xué)體育教師對(duì)目前的培訓(xùn)方式較為滿意。(9)兩市中小學(xué)體育教師整體上對(duì)授課教師比較滿意,教學(xué)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)經(jīng)驗(yàn)豐富的專家教師與幽默風(fēng)趣、感染力強(qiáng)、善于調(diào)動(dòng)聽眾的授課教師最受歡迎。(10)兩市中小學(xué)體育教師參加的在職培訓(xùn)有考核評(píng)價(jià)的只占了一半,考核方式以完成相關(guān)作業(yè)、撰寫培訓(xùn)心得和小論文為主。(11)蘇州市教育局與學(xué)校對(duì)體育教師在職培訓(xùn)的重視程度高于臺(tái)北市,另外,兩市對(duì)中小學(xué)體育教師在職培訓(xùn)的整體評(píng)價(jià)一般,但蘇州市對(duì)在職培訓(xùn)的滿意度高于臺(tái)北市。
[Abstract]:Teacher in-service training is one of the most effective ways to improve the professional quality of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools. This paper adopts the methods of comparative analysis, questionnaire survey, interview and so on, and takes the on-the-job training of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in Suzhou and Taipei as the research object. Through analyzing the respective characteristics of the in-service training of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in the two cities, as well as the similarities and differences and advantages and disadvantages of the on-the-job training organization, training content, training methods, teaching teachers, assessment and evaluation, etc. So as to improve the quality and effect of on-the-job training of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in Suzhou. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools surveyed in the two cities have participated in on-the-job training, indicating that the popularization rate of in-service training of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in the two cities is high. (2) both cities have formulated corresponding laws and regulations to ensure the standardization of in-service training of physical education teachers; The laws and regulations of Suzhou City require more detailed hours and credits for training, while the laws and regulations of Taipei City require more detailed requirements in terms of the assessment and reward of training. Both cities need to further improve the laws and regulations of training in different aspects. (3) the main training organizations in both cities are schools, teacher training centers (teacher training centers) and the Bureau of Education. However, there are more non-governmental organizations in Taipei to undertake the on-the-job training of teachers, which is worthy of reference by the relevant departments in Suzhou. (4) most of the funds for on-the-job training in the two cities are borne by schools or training authorities, and a small number of training funds are borne by individuals alone; The proportion of individual undertaking in Taipei is higher than that in Suzhou, which is beneficial to improve the effect of training. (5) most physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in the two cities can realize the significance of on-the-job training and expect to obtain innovative physical education teaching knowledge and methods in the training; The internal motivation of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in Taipei is higher than that in Suzhou. (6) the on-the-job training time in Suzhou is mainly arranged in the spare time of teachers, and the on-the-job training time in Taipei is mainly arranged in working hours. The number of on-the-job training for physical education teachers in Suzhou is more than that in Taipei. (7) the contents of on-the-job training in the two cities are mainly teaching methods and professional knowledge of physical education, which is consistent with the expected training content of physical education teachers in the two cities; In terms of training content, Taipei City has added folk traditional sports and current hot spots (sexual equality, environmental protection) and so on, which shows that the training content is even richer. (8) the main ways of on-the-job training in both cities are expert lectures, observing famous teachers' classroom teaching, and sharing the experience of teachers' peers. And the primary and secondary school physical education teachers in the two cities are more satisfied with the current training methods. (9) the primary and secondary school physical education teachers in the two cities are more satisfied with the teaching teachers as a whole, the experienced expert teachers and humorous teachers in the teaching site are funny and infectious, and the teachers who are good at mobilizing the audience are the most popular. (10) only half of the on-the-job training attended by the primary and secondary school physical education teachers in the two cities is assessed and evaluated, and the assessment mode is to complete the relevant homework. Writing training experience and small papers. (11) Suzhou Bureau of Education and schools pay more attention to on-the-job training of physical education teachers than Taipei City. In addition, the overall evaluation of on-the-job training of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in the two cities is general, but Suzhou's satisfaction with on-the-job training is higher than that in Taipei.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：G633.96

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李興艷;體育教師在職培訓(xùn)的對(duì)策探討[J];武漢體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

2 陳紅梅;劉慶國(guó);;發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家中小學(xué)教師在職培訓(xùn)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)及其啟示[J];成才;2000年10期

3 錢煥;談中小學(xué)教師的在職培訓(xùn)[J];衡水師專學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

4 郭洋波;實(shí)施素質(zhì)教育與提高教師素質(zhì)[J];繼續(xù)教育研究;2001年04期

5 南鋼;新中國(guó)中小學(xué)教師在職培訓(xùn)的回顧和前瞻[J];當(dāng)代教育科學(xué);2003年09期

6 翟麗萍;教師在職培訓(xùn)的必要性及實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑[J];當(dāng)代教育科學(xué);2003年11期

7 畢玉海;教師角色與教師培訓(xùn)[J];山東教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

8 張世云,劉躍,溫平川,鄭賢銘,趙湘桂;關(guān)于高校教師在職培訓(xùn)的思考[J];重慶郵電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

9 鄧達(dá);教師在職培訓(xùn)的發(fā)展取向及新探索[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2004年06期

10 隋赤;教師在職培訓(xùn)的內(nèi)容選擇[J];中國(guó)成人教育;2005年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 王建民;;體育教師對(duì)體育課程改革接受度的教師培訓(xùn)實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[A];第二十一屆全國(guó)高校田徑科研論文報(bào)告會(huì)論文專輯[C];2011年

2 韓映雄;;我國(guó)高校教師在職培訓(xùn)制度發(fā)展概述[A];紀(jì)念《教育史研究》創(chuàng)刊二十周年論文集（9）——中華人民共和國(guó)教育史研究[C];2009年

3 田學(xué)林;;立足校本,提高貧困地區(qū)教師專業(yè)化水平與職業(yè)道德[A];全國(guó)教育科研“十五”成果論文集（第二卷）[C];2005年

4 胡太林;;以校本教研實(shí)效性促進(jìn)教師專業(yè)發(fā)展[A];國(guó)家教師科研基金十一五階段性成果集（四川卷）[C];2010年

5 陳偉新;;提高教師綜合素養(yǎng),加強(qiáng)師資隊(duì)伍建設(shè)[A];國(guó)家教師科研專項(xiàng)基金科研成果（語(yǔ)文建設(shè)卷2）[C];2013年

6 胡太林;;以校本教研實(shí)效性促進(jìn)教師專業(yè)發(fā)展[A];國(guó)家教師科研基金“十一五”成果集（中國(guó)名校卷）（三）[C];2009年

7 余茂龍;田學(xué)林;宋應(yīng)昌;;貧困地區(qū)(甘肅河西)教師職業(yè)道德與專業(yè)思想培養(yǎng)的資源建設(shè)調(diào)查研究[A];全國(guó)教育科研“十五”成果論文集（第四卷）[C];2005年

8 韓文虹;;教師繼續(xù)教育應(yīng)強(qiáng)化“三種意識(shí)”[A];跨世紀(jì)園丁工程論叢[C];2000年

9 綦延輝;;對(duì)“轉(zhuǎn)軌”形勢(shì)下師訓(xùn)工作的思考[A];跨世紀(jì)園丁工程論叢[C];2000年

10 黃征兵;;教師“問(wèn)題行為”影響學(xué)生心理健康[A];中華教育理論與實(shí)踐科研論文成果選編(第三卷)[C];2012年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 記者 張惠玲;新區(qū)教師隊(duì)伍建設(shè)力度大效果好[N];銅川日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 本報(bào)記者 王占偉;教師教育該如何轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)[N];中國(guó)教師報(bào);2014年

3 本版編輯　單春艷　皮擁軍　樂(lè)先蓮　梁美淑　金紅蓮;國(guó)外教師教育政策凸顯教師陽(yáng)光職業(yè)[N];中國(guó)教育報(bào);2007年

4 特派記者 魏如松;完善教師業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)考核制度[N];海南日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

5 南京市玄武中等專業(yè)學(xué)校 王浩;推進(jìn)中職學(xué)校專業(yè)教師到企業(yè)實(shí)踐的思考[N];江蘇教育報(bào);2011年

6 賈小莊小學(xué);探索教師專業(yè)化新路子[N];青海日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

7 河北省中小學(xué)教師繼續(xù)教育中心　徐莉;教師教育走出盲區(qū)[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

8 郭曉娟;教師專業(yè)化問(wèn)題及解決之道[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

9 陳德如;學(xué)十六大精神 做學(xué)習(xí)型教師[N];中國(guó)遠(yuǎn)洋報(bào);2002年

10 編譯 李茂;無(wú)心插柳柳成陰[N];中國(guó)教師報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李渺;教師的理性追求[D];南京師范大學(xué);2007年

2 徐雄偉;上海市民辦高校教師專業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀與實(shí)證研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2015年

3 呂杰;中國(guó)高等學(xué)校教師人力資本開發(fā)模式研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 潘佃獻(xiàn);連云港市市區(qū)中小學(xué)教師在職培訓(xùn)的調(diào)查分析與建議[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年

2 連玉生;中小學(xué)教師在職培訓(xùn)目標(biāo)體系建構(gòu)研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2010年

3 張穎;英國(guó)中學(xué)教師在職培訓(xùn)研究及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2010年

4 張彩霞;新教師入職初期適應(yīng)現(xiàn)狀及對(duì)策研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2010年

5 呂勝男;基于教師專業(yè)發(fā)展的教師領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者培養(yǎng)研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2011年

6 周思勇;教師專業(yè)發(fā)展的反思與重構(gòu)[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2013年

7 高曲;華德福幼兒教師在職培訓(xùn)體系研究[D];西南大學(xué);2015年

8 顧恩平;制度視角下的農(nóng)村教師專業(yè)發(fā)展問(wèn)題研究[D];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

9 吳秀娟;新教師培訓(xùn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2015年

10 張宏玲;秦皇島市中小學(xué)教師在職培訓(xùn)存在的問(wèn)題與對(duì)策研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2509639