發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-02 09:42

  本文選題：魯人版 + 翰林版��； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以山東人民出版社出版的《普通高中語(yǔ)文課程實(shí)驗(yàn)教科書·必修》(1 —5冊(cè))和翰林出版事業(yè)股份有限公司出版的《普通高級(jí)中學(xué)·國(guó)文》(1——6冊(cè))中的古代文學(xué)部分為研究立足點(diǎn),從選文、助讀和編排三個(gè)方面展開研究,選文是知識(shí)的載體,是學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)古代知識(shí)的主要憑借,選文的質(zhì)量在很大程度上影響教材的質(zhì)量;助讀內(nèi)容是教材由“教本”向“學(xué)本”轉(zhuǎn)化的橋梁,助讀內(nèi)容的質(zhì)量會(huì)影響學(xué)生自學(xué)古代文學(xué)的程度;編排是教材編寫智慧的外化,對(duì)選文和助讀的不同編排,體現(xiàn)了不同教材編寫觀念和教育理念。本研究既包括對(duì)內(nèi)在知識(shí)的分析也包括對(duì)外在形式的研究,既有相同內(nèi)容的篩選也有不同內(nèi)容的比較,期望通過本次研究了解兩版教材古代文學(xué)方面的異同,以便為教材使用者提供一些參考價(jià)值。論文共有五個(gè)部分:第一部分:緒論。首先簡(jiǎn)單介紹兩版教材的研究現(xiàn)狀以及本文的研究意義,其次介紹本文的研究?jī)?nèi)容和研究方法,最后介紹本研究的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。第二部分,即第一章古代文學(xué)選文研究。本章分別從選文數(shù)量、篇幅,體裁、朝代和價(jià)值取向等方面比較分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)兩版教材中古文占據(jù)數(shù)量?jī)?yōu)勢(shì),以短小篇幅為主;體裁類型豐富,以散文為主;由個(gè)人價(jià)值取向延展至其他取向,但“世界”價(jià)值取向缺失。第三部分,即第二章古代文學(xué)助讀研究。選文的助讀內(nèi)容分別從課前、正文、課后三個(gè)維度展開對(duì)比研究。翰林版課前導(dǎo)讀條理清晰,正文注釋圖文并茂,課后多應(yīng)用性習(xí)題注重培養(yǎng)能力;魯人版課前導(dǎo)讀語(yǔ)言優(yōu)美,正文注釋以釋句為主,課后習(xí)題注重方法指導(dǎo)。兩版教材助讀內(nèi)容各有利弊,教材使用者可依據(jù)學(xué)情自主選擇。第四部分,即第三章古代文學(xué)編排研究。本章立足前兩章的研究?jī)?nèi)容,研究?jī)砂娼滩墓糯膶W(xué)的選文和助讀兩部分在編排上的異同,同時(shí)分析兩版教材中相同篇目和作者的編排區(qū)別。分析發(fā)現(xiàn)選文編排具有科學(xué)性特點(diǎn),助讀編排具有實(shí)用性特點(diǎn)。相同篇目和相同作者的作品在編排年級(jí)和學(xué)段上均有差別。第五部分,結(jié)語(yǔ)�？偨Y(jié)兩版教材在古代文學(xué)選文、助讀和編排三方面的優(yōu)勢(shì)與不足,并針對(duì)各自的不足對(duì)教材編寫者提出編寫建議,對(duì)魯人版教材的使用者提出使用建議。
[Abstract]:This article is based on the ancient literature part published by the people's Publishing House of the Shandong people's publishing house, "the experimental textbook of the Chinese language course of ordinary high school" (1 - 5) and the Limited by Share Ltd published by the publishing enterprise of Hanlin, which is published by the Limited by Share Ltd. The carrier is the main reason for students to learn ancient knowledge. The quality of the selected text affects the quality of the textbook to a great extent. The content of help reading is the bridge from "teaching book" to "learning book". The quality of the content will affect the students' self-study of ancient literature; the arrangement is the externalization of the wisdom of the compilation of the textbooks, and the selection and help reading. The same arrangement embodies different writing concepts and educational ideas. This study includes both the analysis of the internal knowledge and the study of the form, the selection of the same content and the comparison of the different contents. This study is expected to understand the similarities and differences of the ancient literature of the two edition of the textbook, so as to provide some reference for the teaching material users. There are five parts in the thesis: the first part: introduction. First, it introduces the research status of the two edition of the textbook and the significance of the study. Secondly, it introduces the contents and methods of this study, and finally introduces the innovation point of this study. The second part is the first chapter of the study of the ancient literary selection. This chapter is from the number, length, and body of the selected text. The comparison and analysis of the genre, Dynasty and the value orientation have found that the ancient texts in the two edition of the textbook occupy a number of advantages, mainly in short length, rich in genre and mainly in prose; the value orientation of the individual is extended to other orientations, but the value orientation of the "world" is missing. The third part, the second chapter of ancient literature research. From the pre class, the text, after class three dimensions to carry out a comparative study. It is clear before class, the text annotations are clear, the text annotations are lurid, the multi application exercises after class pay attention to the training ability; Lu people's pre class reading guide language is beautiful, text annotations are the main interpretation, after class exercise method guidance. The two edition of the teaching materials have advantages and disadvantages, teaching materials have advantages and pros and cons, material and pros and cons, teaching material each have advantages and pros and cons of the teaching material, teaching material has advantages and pros and cons of the textbook, teaching material has advantages and pros and cons of the textbook, material and teaching materials have advantages and pros and cons of the textbook, teaching materials have advantages and pros and cons of the textbook, material and teaching materials have advantages and pros and cons, teaching material each have advantages and pros and pros, material and pros and cons The fourth part, the third chapter, ancient literature arrangement research. Based on the research contents of the first two chapters, this chapter studies the similarities and differences between the two edition of the ancient literature and the two parts of the ancient literature, and analyzes the difference between the same contents and the writers in the two edition of the textbooks. The fifth part, conclusion, summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the two edition of the text in the ancient literature, the help reading and the arrangement of the three aspects, and puts forward the suggestions to the author of the textbook compilers for their own shortcomings, and to the Lu people. The users of the edition of the textbook have proposed the use of suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G633.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李旭;;中國(guó)古籍豎寫左行排版模式溯源[J];東華理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年04期

2 莊照崗;王春雷;;粵教版與臺(tái)灣翰林版高中語(yǔ)文必修教材助讀系統(tǒng)的比較研究[J];課程教學(xué)研究;2014年02期

3 柏峰;;現(xiàn)行語(yǔ)文課本的弊端[J];課程教材教學(xué)研究(中教研究);2009年Z3期

4 何文勝;;人民教育出版社初中語(yǔ)文教科書的價(jià)值取向研究[J];陜西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年S1期

5 陳黎明;王明建;;我國(guó)大陸與臺(tái)灣高中語(yǔ)文課程文件比較研究[J];聊城大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年06期

6 肖建民;單元教學(xué)與單元計(jì)劃比較談[J];基礎(chǔ)教育研究;2003年11期

7 王榮生;中日語(yǔ)文教學(xué)中的閱讀取向比較及討論[J];語(yǔ)文建設(shè);2002年10期

8 盧楊;初中語(yǔ)文教科書的形象助讀系統(tǒng)——關(guān)于插圖功能及其利用探討[J];北京教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

9 鄭芳,陳玉秋;中華傳統(tǒng)旗幟下的臺(tái)灣《國(guó)文》教材[J];中學(xué)語(yǔ)文教學(xué);2000年02期

10 李貞祥;語(yǔ)文教材：“無(wú)非是例子”與“不僅僅是例子”──兼談?wù)Z文教材的性質(zhì)[J];上饒師專學(xué)報(bào);1996年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李惠;滬教版與翰林版高中語(yǔ)文教材中的文言文共同篇目比較研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2016年

2 劉賢智;魯人版高中語(yǔ)文教材小說教學(xué)研究[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2015年

3 何雯;高中語(yǔ)文必修教材中古代作品編選比較研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

4 楊靜;魯人版高中語(yǔ)文必修教材"活動(dòng)性"研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2015年

5 楊振華;中美初中語(yǔ)文教材選文價(jià)值取向的對(duì)比研究[D];聊城大學(xué);2015年

6 王驛鋼;高中語(yǔ)文教材中臺(tái)港作家作品編選比較研究[D];河南大學(xué);2014年

7 安叢叢;魯人版高中語(yǔ)文（必修）文言詩(shī)文練習(xí)系統(tǒng)研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2012年

8 季紅梅;人教版與魯人版高中語(yǔ)文教材文言文編選比較[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2011年

9 涂盈盈;兩套高中語(yǔ)文教科書中古代選文研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2007年

10 關(guān)國(guó)青;高中語(yǔ)文教材古詩(shī)文研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2089710