新課標(biāo)下三個版本初中美術(shù)教材的對比與分析
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 中學(xué)美術(shù)教材 人教版 人美版 蘇少版 對比 出處:《信陽師范學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:教材作為連接教師與學(xué)生的橋梁,不僅凝聚著人類文明和知識的精華,也體現(xiàn)了我國教育的發(fā)展水平。近些年來,隨著基礎(chǔ)教育改革的不斷深入,美術(shù)課程在受到重視的同時,美術(shù)教材在美術(shù)教學(xué)中的地位也越來越重要,成為美術(shù)課程改革的重要內(nèi)容。2011年,國家教育部頒發(fā)《義務(wù)教育美術(shù)課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)(2011年版)》后,作為課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)內(nèi)容的重要載體,以人民教育出版社、人民美術(shù)出版社、江蘇鳳凰少年兒童出版社(以下簡稱人教版、人美版、蘇少版)出版的新教材緊緊把握了課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的新思想和新理念,以全新的面貌呈現(xiàn)給大家,得到了廣泛的重視。但如何讓美術(shù)教材以最優(yōu)化的結(jié)構(gòu)呈現(xiàn)給教師和學(xué)生,這是我們必須要面對和探索的問題。此外,隨著新課程改革的推進(jìn),2015年開始,中國教育已經(jīng)進(jìn)入“核心素養(yǎng)”時代,“核心素養(yǎng)”旨在培養(yǎng)學(xué)生運(yùn)用所學(xué)知識和技能解決生活中實際問題的能力,這也將是未來美術(shù)課程的首要教育目標(biāo)。因此研究美術(shù)教材對新一輪的美術(shù)課程改革的發(fā)展也具有重要意義。本研究立足于義務(wù)教育美術(shù)課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以三個版本初中美術(shù)教材為研究對象,并運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)研究法、對比研究法和分析研究法等現(xiàn)代教育科學(xué)研究方法對不同版本美術(shù)教材進(jìn)行對比研究,以求探討出美術(shù)教材在當(dāng)今基礎(chǔ)教育改革中所發(fā)揮的作用。首先,文章對建國以來我國美術(shù)教材從單一到多樣化的發(fā)展歷程分階段進(jìn)行闡述,以探尋教材編寫的理論依據(jù)。其次,對“三維時期”的2001版和2011版《美術(shù)課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》和美術(shù)教材進(jìn)行縱向?qū)Ρ确治?總結(jié)出新課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和現(xiàn)行美術(shù)教材的變化。再次,分別在編排方式、內(nèi)容編選、欄目設(shè)置以及呈現(xiàn)方式四個方面對2013版的人教版、人美版和蘇少版三個版本教材進(jìn)行橫向的對比與剖析。通過對這三套美術(shù)教材的多維度的分析與比較,總結(jié)出現(xiàn)行三套美術(shù)教材的共同點(diǎn)和各自的結(jié)構(gòu)特色。最后,結(jié)合時代與課程改革的發(fā)展趨勢為“核心素養(yǎng)”時期的初中美術(shù)教材的編寫進(jìn)行展望,力求為未來美術(shù)教材的編寫與使用提供一些有價值的意見和建議。
[Abstract]:As a bridge between teachers and students, teaching material not only condenses the essence of human civilization and knowledge, but also reflects the level of development of education in China. In recent years, with the deepening of the reform of basic education, the art curriculum has been attached importance to at the same time. Art teaching materials play an increasingly important role in art teaching and become an important part of art curriculum reform. In 2011, the National Ministry of Education issued the Art Curriculum Standards for compulsory Education (2011 Edition), as an important carrier of curriculum standards. The new textbooks published by the people's Education Publishing House, the people's Fine Arts Publishing House and the Jiangsu Phoenix Children and Youth Publishing House (hereinafter referred to as the people's Education Edition, the United States Edition, and the Su Xiao Edition) have tightly grasped the new ideas and new ideas of the curriculum standards. It has been paid more and more attention to, but how to make the art teaching materials present to teachers and students in an optimized structure is a problem that we must face and explore. With the development of the new curriculum reform, since 2015, Chinese education has entered the era of "core literacy", which aims to cultivate students' ability to use their knowledge and skills to solve practical problems in life. This will also be the primary educational goal of the art curriculum in the future. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the art teaching materials for the development of a new round of art curriculum reform. This study is based on the art curriculum standards of compulsory education. Taking three versions of junior high school art textbooks as the research object, and using modern educational science research methods, such as literature research, comparative research and analytical research, this paper makes a comparative study of different versions of art teaching materials. In order to explore the role of art teaching materials in the reform of basic education today. Firstly, the article expounds the development process of art teaching materials from single to diversified since the founding of the people's Republic of China. In order to explore the theoretical basis for the compilation of textbooks. Secondly, through the longitudinal comparative analysis of the 2001 edition and 2011 edition of "Three-Dimensional period" and the art textbooks, the author summarizes the changes of the new curriculum standards and the current art teaching materials. In the four aspects of arrangement, content editing, column setting and presentation, the 2013 edition is taught by people respectively. Through the analysis and comparison of the three sets of art textbooks, the common points and the respective structural characteristics of the three sets of art textbooks are summarized. Combined with the development trend of the times and curriculum reform, this paper looks forward to the compilation of junior high school art textbooks during the period of "core accomplishment", and tries to provide some valuable opinions and suggestions for the compilation and use of the art textbooks in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:信陽師范學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:G633.955
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 鐘啟泉;;基于核心素養(yǎng)的課程發(fā)展:挑戰(zhàn)與課題[J];全球教育展望;2016年01期
2 余文森;;從三維目標(biāo)走向核心素養(yǎng)[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(教育科學(xué)版);2016年01期
3 尹少淳;;文化·核心素養(yǎng)·美術(shù)教育——圍繞核心素養(yǎng)的思考[J];教育導(dǎo)刊;2015年09期
4 高明;張志強(qiáng);;新中國中小學(xué)美術(shù)教材的演進(jìn)考述與前景展望[J];邢臺學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年02期
5 杜尚榮;李森;;中小學(xué)教材編寫邏輯體系的反思與重構(gòu)——兼論教材編寫的教學(xué)邏輯體系[J];課程.教材.教法;2014年10期
6 徐開學(xué);;淺論蘇少版初中美術(shù)教材改革[J];考試周刊;2013年28期
7 張志強(qiáng);;中學(xué)美術(shù)教材的多維度比較研究與思考[J];教育與教學(xué)研究;2012年05期
8 李穎稚;;新課改下的新編美術(shù)教材的培養(yǎng)理念分析[J];美術(shù)教育研究;2012年03期
9 石鷗;雷熙;;新中國美術(shù)教科書60年之演進(jìn)[J];湖南師范大學(xué)教育科學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年03期
10 夏冬杰;郭旭;;試論杜威的教材觀及其對新課程改革的啟示[J];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(教育科學(xué)版);2007年08期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 李玉崗;新課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)下初中美術(shù)教材的比較研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2015年
2 唐宇;基于初中美術(shù)教材的模塊整合與單元化教學(xué)研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2015年
3 蘇媛;二十世紀(jì)末與新世紀(jì)初小學(xué)美術(shù)課程教材對比研究[D];寧夏大學(xué);2014年
4 郝萍;關(guān)于中學(xué)美術(shù)寫生課教學(xué)的研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2011年
5 管慧勇;我國中小學(xué)美術(shù)教科書的設(shè)計教學(xué)內(nèi)容研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年
6 李菁莎;關(guān)于美術(shù)教科書的比較研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2005年
,本文編號:1495726
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/1495726.html