本文選題：失語(yǔ)癥　切入點(diǎn)：刺激模式　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：命名障礙是失語(yǔ)癥表達(dá)能力異常的表現(xiàn)之一。本研究采用黃昭鳴、KIMHa-kyung編制的“失語(yǔ)癥評(píng)估軟件系統(tǒng)”中口語(yǔ)表達(dá)—詞語(yǔ)命名的測(cè)試部分,旨在考察不同類型失語(yǔ)癥患者在不同刺激模式下的命名能力,并以此為基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的治療策略研究。研究?jī)?nèi)容及結(jié)果包括以下方面： 1.失語(yǔ)癥患者與正常人在不同刺激模式下命名能力的比較 正常人在視覺、聽覺、聽視同時(shí)、聽視繼時(shí)刺激模式下的命名得分均為滿分10,失語(yǔ)癥患者在四種刺激模式下的命名能力均顯著低于正常人。這提示對(duì)失語(yǔ)癥患者命名障礙進(jìn)行干預(yù)需要建立合理的期望值。 2.非流利型與流利型失語(yǔ)癥在不同刺激模式下命名能力的比較 非流利型與流利型失語(yǔ)癥在視覺、聽覺、聽視同時(shí)、聽視繼時(shí)刺激模式下的命名能力均無顯著性差異。 3.探究了非流利型失語(yǔ)癥在不同刺激模式下的命名能力 非流利型失語(yǔ)癥的命名能力在視覺與聽覺、聽視繼時(shí)與聽覺刺激下存在顯著性差異；在視覺刺激模式下的命名能力與聽視繼時(shí)刺激模式下的命名能力相近；兩者均優(yōu)于聽視同時(shí)刺激模式下的命名能力,聽覺刺激模式下的命名得分最低。這為非流利型失語(yǔ)癥命名障礙治療策略的制定提供了依據(jù)。 4.探究了流利型失語(yǔ)癥在不同刺激模式下的命名能力 流利型失語(yǔ)癥患者在視覺與聽覺、聽覺與聽視繼時(shí)刺激、聽視同時(shí)與聽視繼時(shí)刺激下存在顯著性差異,在聽視繼時(shí)刺激模式下的命名能力優(yōu)于視覺刺激模式下的命名能力；視覺刺激優(yōu)于聽視同時(shí)刺激,聽視同時(shí)刺激優(yōu)于聽覺刺激。這為流利型失語(yǔ)癥命名障礙治療策略的制定提供了依據(jù)。 5.失語(yǔ)癥命名障礙的治療策略 根據(jù)不同類型失語(yǔ)癥患者命名能力的實(shí)際情況,本研究提出了非流利型和流利型失語(yǔ)癥患者命名障礙的治療框架。在治療框架的指導(dǎo)下,進(jìn)一步提出了較為系統(tǒng)的治療策略,以期能對(duì)失語(yǔ)癥命名障礙的臨床治療提供指導(dǎo)和借鑒。
[Abstract]:Nomenclature disorder is one of the manifestations of abnormal expression ability of aphasia.The purpose of this study was to investigate the nomenclature ability of aphasia patients under different stimulation modes by using the test part of the colloquial expression and the naming of words in the aphasia evaluation software system written by Huang Zhaoming and KIMHa-kyung.On the basis of this, the corresponding treatment strategies were studied.The contents and findings of the study include the following:1.Comparison of naming ability between aphasia patients and normal subjects under different stimulation modesThe nomenclature scores of the normal subjects in the visual, auditory, auditory and auditory modes were all 10, and the nomenclature ability of the aphasia patients in the four stimuli was significantly lower than that in the normal subjects.This suggests that the intervention of aphasia patients with nomenclature disorder requires the establishment of reasonable expectations.2.Comparison of nomenclature ability between non-fluency and fluency aphasia under different stimulation modesThere was no significant difference in nomenclature between non-fluency and fluency aphasia under visual, auditory, auditory and visual stimuli.3.This paper explores the naming ability of non-fluency aphasia under different stimulation modes.The nomenclature ability of non-fluency aphasia was significantly different from that of hearing, hearing and hearing, and the naming ability of visual stimulation was similar to that of auditory follow-up.Both of them were superior to the naming ability of the auditory stimulation model, and the auditory stimulation model had the lowest nomenclature score.This provides a basis for the formulation of strategy for the treatment of non-fluency aphasia nomenclature disorder.4.The nomenclature ability of fluency aphasia in different stimuli was explored.The nomenclature ability of the aphasia patients with fluency was better than that of the visual stimulation mode, the nomenclature ability of the auditory and visual follow-up mode was better than that of the visual stimulation mode. There were significant differences in the visual and auditory stimuli, the auditory and visual follow-up stimuli and the auditory and visual follow-up stimuli in the patients with fluency aphasia.Visual stimulation is superior to simultaneous auditory stimulation, and auditory stimulation is superior to auditory stimulation.This provides a basis for the formulation of strategy for the treatment of nomenclature disorder of fluency aphasia.5.Treatment Strategy of nomenclature Disorder in AphasiaAccording to the nomenclature ability of aphasia patients with different types of aphasia, this study proposed a therapeutic framework for nomenclature disorders in aphasia patients with non-fluency and fluency.Under the guidance of the treatment framework, a more systematic treatment strategy was put forward in order to provide guidance and reference for the clinical treatment of aphasia nomenclature disorder.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：R742

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳克蓉;王庭槐;邱衛(wèi)紅;陳少貞;;流利型失語(yǔ)癥患者名詞詞組的使用特征與命名能力的關(guān)系[J];中國(guó)實(shí)用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2008年08期

2 張玉梅,王擁軍,王伊龍,趙性泉,王春雪,周筠,孫學(xué)進(jìn);母語(yǔ)為漢語(yǔ)的失語(yǔ)癥類型與病變部位的關(guān)系[J];首都醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

3 齊進(jìn)興,屈寶華,鄧建忠,王獻(xiàn);腦卒中言語(yǔ)障礙及影響因素分析[J];現(xiàn)代康復(fù);2001年17期

4 熊漢忠,柏曉利,韓在柱,舒華;失語(yǔ)癥患者圖形命名中語(yǔ)音錯(cuò)誤的產(chǎn)生機(jī)制[J];中國(guó)臨床康復(fù);2004年13期

5 孫會(huì)芳;倪朝民;;失語(yǔ)癥的康復(fù)治療:研究與應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)臨床康復(fù);2006年22期

6 周仁來,許杰;知覺啟動(dòng)效應(yīng)及其腦機(jī)制的研究進(jìn)展[J];心理科學(xué);2001年01期

7 劉善華;;口語(yǔ)表達(dá)的心理因素分析[J];現(xiàn)代語(yǔ)文(學(xué)術(shù)綜合版);2011年08期

8 柏曉利,熊漢忠,徐忠寶,畢彥超,韓在柱,舒華;失語(yǔ)癥患者口語(yǔ)命名障礙中語(yǔ)義錯(cuò)誤的原因初探[J];中華神經(jīng)科雜志;2004年04期

9 袁永學(xué);李勝利;;失語(yǔ)癥命名障礙的類型及癥狀[J];中國(guó)康復(fù)理論與實(shí)踐;2007年07期

10 付光斌;毛善平;高小平;張真;張乾;趙華;翟輝;;非流利型失語(yǔ)癥患者命名障礙與語(yǔ)言恢復(fù)之間的關(guān)系[J];卒中與神經(jīng)疾病;2013年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1696879