發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-20 04:19

  本文選題：牽連觀念 + 關(guān)系妄想�。� 參考：《中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志》2017年04期

【摘要】：目的:初步評價(jià)牽連觀念訪談表中文版在精神障礙病人中的信度和效度。方法:由雙語精神病學(xué)專家將英文版牽連觀念訪談表翻譯成中文,再回譯成英文,最后初步定稿中文版牽連觀念訪談表。共179名精神障礙病人和50名健康對照進(jìn)入研究并完成了中文版牽連觀念訪談表。結(jié)果:牽連觀念訪談表中文版在精神障礙病人中的Cronbachα系數(shù)為0.85;評分者一致性信度系數(shù)為0.97(P=0.00);探索性因子分析得到4個(gè)因子,可解釋63.93%的總變異量。牽連觀念訪談表總分與陽性癥狀量表的條目14(SAPS-14)的相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.58(P0.01);以SAPS-14≥3分為分組因素,根據(jù)牽連觀念訪談表得分繪制的ROC曲線下面積為0.89(95%CI:0.94-0.84)。結(jié)論:牽連觀念訪談表中文版具有良好的信效度,可用于對精神障礙病人牽連觀念癥狀的臨床評估。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the implicative concept interview form in patients with mental disorders. Methods: bilingual psychiatrists translated the English interview form into Chinese and then translated it back into English. A total of 179 patients with mental disorders and 50 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Results: the Cronbach 偽 coefficient was 0.85 in the Chinese version of the implicative concept interview form, the reliability coefficient of the score was 0.97%, and the exploratory factor analysis showed four factors, which could explain 63.93% of the total variation. The correlation coefficient between the total score of implicative concept interview table and the item of positive symptom scale (14) was 0.58% P0.01and the area under ROC curve plotted according to the score of implicated-concept interview table was 0.8995 CI: 0.94-0.84U, according to SAPS-14 鈮，

本文編號：1776217