創(chuàng)傷相關評分系統(tǒng)及抗生素預防性使用與膿毒癥發(fā)生及救治結(jié)局的關系
發(fā)布時間:2019-01-23 20:15
【摘要】:目的探討創(chuàng)傷相關評分系統(tǒng)(ISS、NISS、SIRS、mSIRS以及SPSPT)在評估創(chuàng)傷患者膿毒癥發(fā)生和救治結(jié)局中的應用價值,希望為臨床提供快捷、可靠的預測工具;探討創(chuàng)傷后抗生素預防性使用對膿毒癥發(fā)生的關系,以促進預防性抗生素的合理使用。 方法(1)回顧分析2010年1月~2012年1月重慶市急救醫(yī)療中心住院救治的351例創(chuàng)傷患者臨床資料,分別計算ISS、NISS、SIRS評分、mSIRS評分及SPSPT,同時預測患者膿毒癥發(fā)生和死亡結(jié)局。(2)選擇ISS≥16分的嚴重多發(fā)傷患者149例,收集其預防性使用抗生素的給藥起始時間、療程以及更換情況等信息,分析抗生素預防性使用與膿毒癥發(fā)生的關系。 結(jié)果(1)創(chuàng)傷評分:在預測創(chuàng)傷后膿毒癥發(fā)生方面,SPSPT與mSIRS相當(P0.05,Z=0.029),都優(yōu)于SIRS、NISS和ISS,且SPSPT能進一步區(qū)分膿毒癥的嚴重程度(P=0.019)。在預測死亡方面,其準確度SPSPT優(yōu)于mSIRS、SIRS、NISS和ISS。(2)抗生素預防性使用:①給藥時機,無膿毒癥組[(5.3±2.7)h]明顯早于膿毒癥組[(10.5±4.0)h]和嚴重膿毒癥組[(11.8±4.9)h](P0.001)。將給藥起始時間分為傷后0h~3h(3h組)、3h~9h(3h組)、9h~22h(9h組),膿毒癥發(fā)生率分別為11.54%、74.63%、94.64%,3h組、9h組膿毒癥發(fā)生率顯著高于3h組(P0.001)。②使用給藥時機預測膿毒癥發(fā)生的ROC下面積為0.887,預測的敏感性和特異性分別為84.9%、81.4%,最佳診斷點為傷后6.5h,6.5h組膿毒癥發(fā)生率(31.37%)明顯低于6.5h組(91.83%)(P0.001)。③抗生素使用療程分為0~3d、4~5d、6~7d、7d四組,膿毒癥發(fā)生率分別為60.87%、59.46%、65.00%、89.80%,7d組顯著高于其他三組(P0.001)。④抗生素更換情況,無更換組膿毒癥發(fā)生率(65.49%)低于更換組(88.89%)(P0.001);無更換組SIRS持續(xù)時間[(3.3±2.2)d]短于更換組[(4.4±2.6)d](t=2.8,P=0.006);無更換組mSIRS分值[(4.4±1.2)分]低于更換組[(4.9±1.0)分](t=2.5,P=0.013)。 結(jié)論(1)ISS、NISS、SIRS、mSIRS及SPSPT均能較好評價創(chuàng)傷后膿毒癥發(fā)生及救治結(jié)局。SPSPT結(jié)合了解剖和傷后生理指標能更加全面的進行預測以提高預測的準確性,同時SPSPT還能對創(chuàng)傷后膿毒癥和嚴重膿毒癥的高危人群加以區(qū)別,以便臨床早期進行預測和處理,從而減少并發(fā)癥和死亡的發(fā)生率,提高救治水平。(2)合理使用抗生素可以從一定程度上減少創(chuàng)傷后膿毒癥的發(fā)生。所以,創(chuàng)傷后預防性使用抗生素的時間應盡早,用藥療程應適中,,用藥種類應準確,不要隨意延長抗生素的療程以及頻繁更換抗生素的種類。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the value of trauma related scoring system (ISS,NISS,SIRS,mSIRS and SPSPT) in evaluating the occurrence and outcome of sepsis in patients with trauma, and to provide a rapid and reliable tool for predicting the outcome of sepsis. To explore the relationship between prophylactic use of posttraumatic antibiotics and sepsis in order to promote rational use of prophylactic antibiotics. Methods (1) the clinical data of 351 trauma patients hospitalized in Chongqing Emergency Medical Center from January 2010 to January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. ISS,NISS,SIRS score, mSIRS score and SPSPT, were calculated respectively. At the same time, the occurrence and death outcome of sepsis were predicted. (2) 149 patients with severe multiple injuries with ISS 鈮
本文編號:2414154
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the value of trauma related scoring system (ISS,NISS,SIRS,mSIRS and SPSPT) in evaluating the occurrence and outcome of sepsis in patients with trauma, and to provide a rapid and reliable tool for predicting the outcome of sepsis. To explore the relationship between prophylactic use of posttraumatic antibiotics and sepsis in order to promote rational use of prophylactic antibiotics. Methods (1) the clinical data of 351 trauma patients hospitalized in Chongqing Emergency Medical Center from January 2010 to January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. ISS,NISS,SIRS score, mSIRS score and SPSPT, were calculated respectively. At the same time, the occurrence and death outcome of sepsis were predicted. (2) 149 patients with severe multiple injuries with ISS 鈮
本文編號:2414154
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/jjyx/2414154.html
最近更新
教材專著