【摘要】：目的比較急性結(jié)石性膽囊炎患者分別采用腹腔鏡膽囊切除術(shù)以及開腹膽囊切除術(shù)的臨床效果。方法選擇我院2014年2月至2017年2月收治的50例急性結(jié)石性膽囊炎患者,對(duì)照組:開腹膽囊切除術(shù),觀察組:腹腔鏡膽囊切除術(shù)�；仡櫺苑治鰞山M急性結(jié)石性膽囊炎患者的腸鳴音恢復(fù)時(shí)間、術(shù)后24 hVAS評(píng)分結(jié)果以及住院時(shí)間等。結(jié)果觀察組急性結(jié)石性膽囊炎患者腸鳴音恢復(fù)時(shí)間、術(shù)后24 hVAS評(píng)分結(jié)果以及住院時(shí)間等優(yōu)于對(duì)照組(P0.05)。結(jié)論對(duì)于急性結(jié)石性膽囊炎患者,合理開展腹腔鏡膽囊切除術(shù),同傳統(tǒng)開腹膽囊切除術(shù)療效相比,可以保證患者的治療康復(fù)時(shí)間得以顯著縮短,術(shù)后疼痛癥狀得以顯著緩解,術(shù)后并發(fā)癥顯著降低。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Methods 50 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis from February 2014 to February 2017 were selected. The control group was treated with open cholecystectomy and the observation group with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The recovery time of bowel sound, 24 h VAS score and hospitalization time were analyzed retrospectively in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Results the recovery time of bowel sound, the score of VAS and the length of hospitalization in the observation group were better than those in the control group (P0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more effective than traditional open cholecystectomy in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Postoperative complications were significantly reduced.
【作者單位】： 廣東省佛山市順德區(qū)北n匾皆，

本文編號(hào)：2124851