本文選題：勞倫斯　切入點：民主　出處：《中南大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：摘要：戴維·赫伯特·勞倫斯(David Herbert Lawrence)(1885-1930)是二十世紀英國重要的小說家,也是二十世紀最具爭議的作家。雖然勞倫斯已經(jīng)得到了普遍的肯定,獲得了與他才華相當?shù)臉s譽,但是對于勞倫斯的誤解并沒有消弭。特別是勞倫斯民主思想沒有得到足夠的重視,對勞倫斯民主觀研究始終停留在對其領(lǐng)袖原則的批判上,指責他是一個獨裁專制的鼓吹者,筆者認為這是一種斷章取義的歪曲。 勞倫斯身上有不可避免的階級意識,無論是從感情上還是在身份上勞倫斯都傾向于工人階級,在這基礎(chǔ)上社會主義思想的深刻影響使他具有一定的社會主義傾向,社會主義一直是勞倫斯民主思想的底色。 勞倫斯的自傳體小說《兒子與情人》實質(zhì)上是勞倫斯擺脫母親和母親代表的社會意識束縛,從自我缺失到成長的過程。打破一切社會觀念的束縛,成為最真實的自我,既是勞倫斯一生的追求,也是勞倫斯民主的目標。 勞倫斯認為,自由最大障礙是關(guān)于國家、民族的理想,實現(xiàn)自由必須把自己從理想中掙脫出來；社會狀態(tài)下,人類從來都不平等,平等的理想導致革命,也導致虛偽。真實的平等是每個人成為真實的自我,互不干涉,“成為你自己”才是真正的民主之路。 戰(zhàn)爭讓勞倫斯對世界絕望,一方面他陷入對人類的憎恨之中,強烈地咒罵人類,呼吁領(lǐng)袖崇拜；另一方面希望逃離骯臟的世界,建立一個烏托邦王國。但是無論是他的領(lǐng)袖原則還是他的“拉納尼姆”都是他民主思想的實踐,并沒有走向獨裁和專制。
[Abstract]:David Herbert Lawrence David Herbert Lawrence (1885-1930) is an important British novelist in 20th century and the most controversial writer of 20th century. But the misunderstanding of Lawrence has not been dispelled. In particular, Lawrence's democratic thought has not been given enough attention. The study of Lawrence's democratic concept has always remained in the criticism of his leader's principles, accusing him of being a dictatorial and autocratic advocate. The author believes that this is a distortion taken out of context. Lawrence had an inevitable class consciousness, and Lawrence was inclined to the working class both emotionally and in status. On this basis, the profound influence of socialist thought made him have a certain socialist tendency. Socialism has always been the foundation of Lawrence's democratic thought. Lawrence's autobiographical novel "son and lover" is essentially the process of Lawrence getting rid of the shackles of mother and mother's social consciousness, from self-absence to growing up, breaking the shackles of all social concepts and becoming the most true self. It is not only the pursuit of Lawrence's life, but also the goal of Lawrence's democracy. Lawrence believes that the greatest obstacle to freedom is the ideal of a nation and a nation, from which freedom must be achieved. In society, the ideal of equality has never been equal, and the ideal of equality has led to revolution. True equality is everyone's true self, not interfering with each other, and being yourself is the true path to democracy. The war made Lawrence desperate for the world. On the one hand, he fell into hatred of humanity, cursing strongly at humanity and calling for leadership worship; on the other hand, he wanted to escape from the dirty world. The establishment of a Utopian kingdom. But neither his leadership principles nor his "Lananim" were practices of his democratic ideas, and they did not move towards dictatorship and despotism.
【學位授予單位】：中南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：I561.074

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 殷U，

本文編號：1627035