【摘要】：正這一組討論稿的源起是劉旭光對(duì)王峰"取消主義美學(xué)"觀念的批評(píng)和王峰的反批評(píng),文章發(fā)表之后引起一些朋友的興趣,在2013年復(fù)旦大學(xué)召開(kāi)的上海四校文藝學(xué)聯(lián)席會(huì)議上,爭(zhēng)論再起,張寶貴和張旭曙也加入爭(zhēng)論。從觀點(diǎn)上看,劉旭光從康德美學(xué)出發(fā),試圖建立一種新型的、富有彈性的形而上美學(xué),而王峰從后期維特根斯坦美學(xué)出發(fā),質(zhì)疑這一建設(shè)的可能性和必要性,張寶貴認(rèn)為劉旭光和王峰看似對(duì)立的觀點(diǎn)中存在著相近之處,提出生活美學(xué)的解決方案,張旭曙則從更宏觀的中國(guó)形而上學(xué)建設(shè)問(wèn)題出發(fā)
[Abstract]:The source of this group of discussion manuscripts is Liu Xuguang's criticism of Wang Feng's concept of "removal aesthetics" and Wang Feng's counter-criticism. After the article was published, it aroused the interest of some friends. At the 2013 joint meeting of literature and art of Shanghai four schools held by Fudan University, the debate resumed, and Zhang valuable and Zhang Xushu joined the debate. From the point of view, Liu Xuguang tries to establish a new and flexible metaphysical aesthetics from Kant aesthetics, while Wang Feng questions the possibility and necessity of this construction from the later Weitgenstein aesthetics. Zhang valuable believes that there are similarities between Liu Xuguang and Wang Feng in their seemingly opposite viewpoints, and puts forward the solution of life aesthetics. Zhang Xushu starts from the broader problem of Chinese metaphysics construction.
【分類號(hào)】：B83-092
，

本文編號(hào)：2504438