【摘要】：赫伯特·馬爾庫(kù)塞(Herbert Marcuse,1879-1979)是社會(huì)批判理論的重要構(gòu)建者和早期法蘭克福學(xué)派代表人物之一。國(guó)內(nèi)外的馬爾庫(kù)塞研究在“現(xiàn)代性”語(yǔ)境中再度升溫,對(duì)其技術(shù)思想研究正在逐漸深入。論文從技術(shù)哲學(xué)的理論視野出發(fā),聚焦于馬爾庫(kù)塞技術(shù)的審美救贖思想,旨在解讀其技術(shù)理性批判之外建構(gòu)維度的技術(shù)思想,以期豐富西方馬克思主義代表人物的技術(shù)哲學(xué)研究。論文圍繞馬爾庫(kù)塞“為什么要對(duì)技術(shù)進(jìn)行救贖?”、“為什么選擇技術(shù)的審美救贖路徑?”、“技術(shù)的審美救贖方案是如何展開(kāi)的?”以及“技術(shù)的審美救贖思想應(yīng)如何評(píng)價(jià)?”四個(gè)環(huán)環(huán)相扣的問(wèn)題展開(kāi),依次回答了技術(shù)的審美救贖思想的理論起點(diǎn)、生成緣由、邏輯展開(kāi)和學(xué)術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)。 首先,馬爾庫(kù)塞以對(duì)發(fā)達(dá)工業(yè)社會(huì)的總體性批判為理論主軸,將技術(shù)理性批判與意識(shí)形態(tài)批判相結(jié)合為最大特色,但因“技術(shù)理性決定論”的思維方式最終導(dǎo)致了“惡性循環(huán)”的理論困境。其次,論文從審美現(xiàn)代性的文化脈絡(luò)、“后技術(shù)理性”的哲學(xué)源泉、美學(xué)還原路徑的現(xiàn)實(shí)起因三個(gè)角度解讀了其技術(shù)的審美救贖思想的生成緣由。再次,面對(duì)發(fā)達(dá)工業(yè)社會(huì)技術(shù)理性的全面控制這一病態(tài),馬爾庫(kù)塞給出了以技術(shù)、自然和人性為建構(gòu)對(duì)象,以“美學(xué)還原”為建構(gòu)路徑的審美救贖方案。最后,論文從限度和價(jià)值兩個(gè)維度評(píng)價(jià)了馬爾庫(kù)塞技術(shù)的審美救贖思想,指出其學(xué)術(shù)傳承路徑為“批判繼續(xù),建構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)向”。
[Abstract]:Herbert Marcuse (Herbert Marcuse,1879-1979) is an important architect of social critical theory and one of the representatives of the early Frankfurt School. Marcuse's research at home and abroad heats up again in the context of "modernization", and the study of his technical thought is gradually deepening. From the theoretical perspective of philosophy of technology, this paper focuses on Marcuse's thought of aesthetic redemption of technology, in order to interpret the technical thought of constructing dimension beyond the criticism of technical rationality. In order to enrich the western Marxist representatives of the study of philosophy of technology. The thesis focuses on Marcuse's "Why should technology be redeemed?", "Why choose the aesthetic redemption path of technology?", "how to carry out the aesthetic redemption scheme of technology?" And "how to evaluate the aesthetic redemption thought of technology?" Four interrelated questions are unfolded, and the theoretical starting point, generating reason, logical expansion and academic evaluation of the aesthetic redemption thought of technology are answered in turn. First of all, Marcuse takes the overall criticism of the developed industrial society as the theoretical main axis, and combines the criticism of technical rationality with the criticism of ideology as the biggest characteristic. However, the mode of thinking of "technical rational determinism" finally leads to the theoretical dilemma of "vicious circle". Secondly, the paper interprets the reasons for the formation of the aesthetic redemption thought from three angles: the cultural context of aesthetic modernization, the philosophical source of "post-technical rationality" and the realistic cause of aesthetic reduction path. Thirdly, in the face of the morbid control of technological rationality in developed industrial society, Marcuse gave an aesthetic redemption scheme with technology, nature and human nature as the construction object and "aesthetic restoration" as the construction path. Finally, the paper evaluates the aesthetic redemption thought of Marcuse technology from the two dimensions of limit and value, and points out that its academic inheritance path is "critical continuation, construction turn".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：B832.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 道格拉斯·凱爾勒,陸俊;馬爾庫(kù)塞的遺產(chǎn)[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年01期

2 朱春艷;陳凡;;STS視閾下馬爾庫(kù)塞社會(huì)批判理論解讀[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

3 朱春艷;張麗;;論馬爾庫(kù)塞的美學(xué)救贖之路[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年06期

4 葉曉璐;;從意識(shí)形態(tài)批判到技術(shù)批判理論——馬爾庫(kù)塞和芬伯格技術(shù)理論的比較[J];當(dāng)代國(guó)外馬克思主義評(píng)論;2008年00期

5 丁國(guó)旗;文化危機(jī)與美學(xué)還原——一種對(duì)馬爾庫(kù)塞思想的讀解[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

6 顏巖;;第三代批判理論家與批判社會(huì)理論[J];國(guó)外理論動(dòng)態(tài);2009年07期

7 陳開(kāi)晟;;超越現(xiàn)代性的困境——論法蘭克福學(xué)派的審美現(xiàn)代性思想[J];廣西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

8 朱春艷;陳凡;;技術(shù)批判視野下的現(xiàn)代性問(wèn)題探究——安德魯·費(fèi)恩伯格的“可選擇的現(xiàn)代性”理論分析[J];科學(xué)技術(shù)哲學(xué)研究;2010年05期

9 安德魯·費(fèi)恩伯格;朱春艷;;哈貝馬斯或馬爾庫(kù)塞:兩種類型的批判?[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實(shí);2005年06期

10 周金華;;馬爾庫(kù)塞生態(tài)社會(huì)主義思想的源流[J];馬克思主義哲學(xué)研究;2008年00期

，

本文編號(hào)：2494354