認(rèn)知隱喻研究是近年來的一個核心問題,其研究也涉及多個領(lǐng)域。2000年,馬克·特納(Mark Turner)在其著Death is the Mother of Beauty一書中以英文文學(xué)作品為語料對親屬隱喻進(jìn)行了深入的研究。事實上,在現(xiàn)代漢語中,類似“失敗乃成功之母”和“兄弟院�！边@些親屬隱喻表達(dá)是常見的。本研究以Lakoff和Johnson的概念隱喻理論為框架,對北京大學(xué)CCL語料庫中“父”母”相關(guān)的隱喻語料進(jìn)行分析,探討現(xiàn)代漢語中“父”“母”隱喻的構(gòu)建、認(rèn)知和理解過程。該分析主要從語言,認(rèn)知和文化角度進(jìn)行。首先,作者分別以“父”“母”為關(guān)鍵詞,從CCL語料庫中收集相關(guān)語料,運用Steen提出的MIPVU的方法對所獲語料進(jìn)行識別,得到相關(guān)“父”隱喻表達(dá)3647個和“母”隱喻11390個。然后按照源域的意象圖式將“父”“母”隱喻分為創(chuàng)造者、生殖器官、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者、養(yǎng)育者四種圖式類型,進(jìn)而在概念隱喻理論下對所選“父”“母”隱喻進(jìn)行認(rèn)知分析,挖掘其隱喻構(gòu)建的對稱性特征,最后試圖分析“父”“母”隱喻構(gòu)建的影響因素。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),四種圖式類型的“父”“母”隱喻分別在構(gòu)建過程中形成了對稱性,不對稱性以及不... 

【文章來源】：湖南科技大學(xué)湖南省

【文章頁數(shù)】：80 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Objective and Significance of the Research
    1.3 Research Methodology
    1.4 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 Previous Studies of Kinship Metaphor
    2.2 Previous Studies of Metaphor with Corpus Method
    2.3 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretical Foundation
    3.1 The Basic Elements of Conceptual Metaphor Theory
        3.1.1 Conceptual Domain
        3.1.2 Image Schema
        3.1.3 Mapping
        3.1.4 Invariance Principle
        3.1.5 The Principle of Similarity
    3.2 Relations between Metaphor and Culture
        3.2.1 Groundings of Conceptual System
        3.2.2 Interrelations between Metaphor and Culture
    3.3 Summary
Chapter 4 Feature Analysis of “父（fu）” and “母（mu）” Metaphors
    4.1 Four Types of Schemas in “父（fu）” and “母（mu）” Metaphors
        4.1.1 Creator Schema
        4.1.2 Reproductive Organ Schema
        4.1.3 Leader Schema
        4.1.4 Fosterer Schema
    4.2 Symmetry Analysis of Metaphorical Expressions in the Schemas
        4.2.1 Symmetry
        4.2.2 Asymmetry
        4.2.3 Incomplete Symmetry
    4.3 Summary
Chapter 5 Influencing Factors for Forming “ 父 （fu）” and “ 母 （mu）” Metaphors
    5.1 Analogical Way of Thinking
    5.2 Traditional Chinese Culture of “父（fu）” and “母（mu）”
        5.2.1 Semantic Origins of “父（fu）” and “母（mu）”
        5.2.2 Cultural Features of “父（fu）” and “母（mu）”
        5.2.3 Cultural Influences on “父（fu）” “母（mu）” Metaphors
    5.3 Summary
Chapter 6 Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings
    6.2 Limitations of the Research
    6.3 Suggestions for Further Studies
Bibliography
Appendix A
Appendix B
Acknowledgements



本文編號：2923307