【摘要】：韓、漢兩大語法系統(tǒng)中的諸多讓步表現(xiàn)形式對于韓中兩種語言的學習者來說既是學習的重點同時也是難點。本文力圖通過語用理論中“預設”理論來進行研究,以語言的實際應用為依托,對讓步句進行剖析。 第一章中從本體及對比的角度考察了韓中兩國讓步句的研究現(xiàn)狀,發(fā)現(xiàn)以往的研究多立足于讓步句在宏觀系統(tǒng)中的被分類情況,或是從語義及句法的角度對讓步復句進行整體的研究,或是單獨針對某個讓步接續(xù)詞尾進行討論,涉及語用方面的深入研究特別是對比研究還較為匱乏,因此從語用角度對兩國讓步句進行對比分析仍具備一定的價值。 第二章中重點介紹本文研究所依據(jù)的理論——“預設理論”的相關概念,分類,指定本文研究所采納的觀點,從而為本文的研究提供了理論支持。 第三章開始正式利用預設理論分別對韓中兩國具有代表性的讓步表現(xiàn)一一進行討論。主要圍繞預設理論所包含的“預設期待”、“期待否定”、“內含”三方面來剖析讓步句在實際語言表達中所體現(xiàn)的特點。 第四章則主要針對第三章的分析結果進行討論,從命題的虛實；預設期待的出發(fā)點；讓步句表達的目的及內在的情感；讓步復句的前后分句是否構成對比項四方面來進行討論,得出了韓中讓步表現(xiàn)自身的特點以及兩種語言的異同點。 最后,結論部分對該論文進行通篇的整理,分析了對比的結果,得出結論。并找出在研究過程中存在的缺點與不足,以期能夠在今后的學習中繼續(xù)對該方面有所研究。
[Abstract]:Many forms of concession in Korean and Chinese grammar systems are both the focus and difficulty of learning for learners of Korean and Chinese languages. This paper tries to study the "presupposition" theory in pragmatic theory and analyze the concession sentences based on the practical application of language. In the first chapter, we investigate the research status of concession sentences between Korea and China from the point of view of ontology and contrast, and find that most of the previous studies are based on the classification of concession sentences in the macro system, either from the semantic and syntactic point of view of the concession complex sentence as a whole, or separately for a concession sequel, involving pragmatic in-depth research, especially the contrastive study is still relatively scarce. Therefore, it is still valuable to make a contrastive analysis of concession sentences between the two countries from a pragmatic point of view. The second chapter focuses on the related concepts and classification of the theory of "presupposition theory", which is the basis of this study, and specifies the viewpoints adopted in this paper, thus providing theoretical support for the research of this paper. The third chapter begins to discuss the representative concession performance of South Korea and China by using presupposition theory. This paper mainly analyzes the characteristics of concession sentences in practical language expression from three aspects: "presupposition expectation", "expectation negation" and "inclusion" contained in presupposition theory. The fourth chapter mainly discusses the analysis results of the third chapter, from the false reality of the proposition; the starting point of presupposition expectation; the purpose and internal emotion of the concession sentence expression; whether the front and rear clauses of the concession complex sentence constitute a contrastive item, and obtains the characteristics of the concession expression itself and the similarities and differences between the two languages. Finally, the conclusion part arranges the whole paper, analyzes the results of comparison, and draws a conclusion. And find out the shortcomings and shortcomings in the research process, in order to continue to study this aspect in the future.
【學位授予單位】：延邊大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H146;H55

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 孫茂玲;;近十年語用預設研究綜述[J];懷化學院學報;2010年08期

2 吳凱風;;“雖然”的語法化探析[J];井岡山學院學報;2006年06期

3 徐陽春,侯友蘭;論讓步[J];山東師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2005年01期

4 王躍平;;試析虛擬性讓步句的規(guī)約隱涵和預設[J];徐州師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年02期

5 張洪超;劉昌華;;讓步復句的預設研究[J];徐州師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年03期

6 王振來;韓國留學生學習關聯(lián)詞語的偏誤分析[J];云南師范大學學報;2005年03期

7 侯書婷;;英漢讓步句的對比與翻譯[J];華中師范大學研究生學報;2010年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前6條

1 劉謙功;外國學生漢語讓步式復句習得研究及教學新思路[D];北京語言文化大學;2000年

2 王彥杰;“寧可”句式的語義選擇原則及其語篇否定功能[D];北京語言文化大學;2002年

3 唐鳳燕;現(xiàn)代漢語“即使”復句探析[D];暨南大學;2003年

4 劉永紅;現(xiàn)代漢語轉折復句的邏輯語義分析[D];廣西師范大學;2003年

5 凌瑜;讓步連詞演變及語法功能研究例說[D];浙江大學;2007年

6 毛京京;論語用預設及其話語交際功能[D];東北師范大學;2009年

，

本文編號：2506036