發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-15 22:07

【摘要】：呂叔湘把漢語分為古代和近代兩個(gè)時(shí)期，本文研究的時(shí)間節(jié)點(diǎn)是以隋為結(jié)點(diǎn)的古代漢語，又把古代漢語分為上古漢語和中古漢語兩個(gè)主體部分。1運(yùn)用構(gòu)式語法及語法化理論對古代漢語部分的“于”、“為”、“見”、“被”等標(biāo)記被動式作歷時(shí)與共時(shí)的全面考察。考察中充分利用甲骨文、金文、本土文獻(xiàn)、佛傳經(jīng)等語料對標(biāo)記被動式的類型、構(gòu)式特點(diǎn)、施事賓語的特點(diǎn)、被動式中動詞性成分的特點(diǎn)以及被動標(biāo)記的分布、層級和功能等進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的描寫和闡釋，勾勒出標(biāo)記被動式在古代漢語中的歷時(shí)發(fā)展軌跡，同時(shí)，著眼于同一標(biāo)記被動式的歷時(shí)比較研究，以揭示古代漢語標(biāo)記被動式發(fā)展演變的特點(diǎn)和規(guī)律。 全文的內(nèi)容如下： 第1章緒論，回顧了漢語被動式的研究現(xiàn)狀和發(fā)展脈絡(luò)；介紹了漢語被動式概念的界定、研究的對象、價(jià)值和意義以及與被動式研究相關(guān)的語法理論；說明了本文的研究范圍、研究分期、研究目標(biāo)、研究語料和研究方法。 第2章對上古漢語的標(biāo)記被動式進(jìn)行研究�！坝凇弊直粍邮绞巧瞎艥h語被動的主要形式，這一章首先回顧了“于”字被動式的研究現(xiàn)狀和發(fā)展脈絡(luò)；然后分殷商及西周、春秋戰(zhàn)國、西漢三個(gè)時(shí)期考察上古漢語的標(biāo)記被動式，主要通過各標(biāo)記被動式的使用情況統(tǒng)計(jì)和類型描寫，展現(xiàn)各階段標(biāo)記被動式的特點(diǎn)、施事賓語的特點(diǎn)、動詞性成分的特點(diǎn)以及被動標(biāo)記的層級及分布，，基于考察、描寫、分析基礎(chǔ)上建立上古漢語被動標(biāo)記范疇，并對各標(biāo)記的呈現(xiàn)和功能進(jìn)行歸納。2 第3章對中古漢語標(biāo)記被動式進(jìn)行研究。這一章首先回顧了中古漢語標(biāo)記被動式研究現(xiàn)狀，特別關(guān)注中古漢語的主要被動形式“為”字式的研究情況；然后，分東漢、魏晉、南北朝及隋代三個(gè)時(shí)期考察中古漢語的標(biāo)記被動式，考察中區(qū)分本土文獻(xiàn)書面語語料和佛傳經(jīng)口語語料，分別對兩類語料進(jìn)行考察和統(tǒng)計(jì)，通過共時(shí)描寫和歷時(shí)比較對這一時(shí)期的標(biāo)記被動式作出相應(yīng)的闡釋。1 第4章結(jié)語，運(yùn)用比較法、歸納法以及構(gòu)式語法、語法化理論等對古代漢語標(biāo)記被動式的發(fā)展演變的特點(diǎn)、規(guī)律和動因等做一個(gè)總結(jié)和歸納；同時(shí)對沒有來得及考察解釋的問題做一個(gè)線索和存疑小結(jié)。
[Abstract]:Lv Shuxiang divided Chinese into two periods, ancient and modern. The time node studied in this paper is ancient Chinese with Sui as its node. Then the ancient Chinese language is divided into two main parts: the upper ancient Chinese and the middle ancient Chinese. 1 using the theory of construction grammar and grammaticalization, the author makes use of the theory of "Yu", "yes" and "see" in ancient Chinese. A diachronic and synchronic study of passive works such as Bei. In the investigation, we make full use of the materials such as oracle bone inscription, Jinwen, native literature, Buddhist scriptures, etc. to mark the type of passive form, the characteristics of construction, the characteristics of agent object, the characteristics of verb components in the passive form and the distribution of passive markers. The level and function are described and explained in detail, and the diachronic development track of marked passive form in ancient Chinese is outlined. Meanwhile, the diachronic comparative study of the same marker passive form is focused on. In order to reveal the characteristics and rules of the development and evolution of the passive type of ancient Chinese markers. The main contents of the thesis are as follows: chapter 1 introduces the research status and development of passive Chinese, introduces the definition, object, value and significance of passive Chinese, and introduces the grammatical theories related to passive study. This paper illustrates the scope of this study, research stages, research objectives, research corpus and research methods. Chapter 2 studies the marker passive form of ancient Chinese. The passive form of "Yu" is the main passive form in ancient Chinese. This chapter first reviews the research status and development of the passive form of "Yu". Then divided into Yin and Shang and Western Zhou Dynasty, Spring and Autumn period and warring States period, the three periods of the Western Han Dynasty inspected the sign passive form of ancient Chinese, mainly through the use statistics and type description of each tagged passive form, showing the characteristics of each stage marked passive type. On the basis of investigation, description and analysis, the author establishes the category of passive marker in ancient Chinese, including the characteristics of agent object, the characteristics of verb sex component and the level and distribution of passive marker. In chapter 3, the passive form of middle ancient Chinese markers is studied. This chapter first reviews the status quo of the research on the passive form of markers in the Middle Ancient Chinese, and pays special attention to the research of the main passive form of the Middle Ancient Chinese, "Bei". Then, divided into three periods of the Eastern Han, Wei and Jin dynasties, Southern and Northern dynasties and Sui Dynasty to investigate the three periods of the ancient Chinese mark passive, the study distinguished the native literature written language data and Buddhist scriptures spoken language data, respectively, the two kinds of data were investigated and counted. Through synchronic description and diachronic comparison, this paper interprets the marked passive form of this period. 1 Chapter 4, conclusion, applies comparative method, inductive method and construction grammar. The grammaticalization theory makes a summary of the characteristics, rules and motives of the development and evolution of the passive form of markers in ancient Chinese. At the same time did not have time to examine the explanation of the problem to do a clue and a dubious summary.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H141

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 曹鳳霞;;類型學(xué)觀照下的春秋戰(zhàn)國時(shí)期“于”字被動式[J];吉林師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2013年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1

本文編號：2409158