【摘要】：大量的研究表明傳統(tǒng)意義上的不及物動詞存在明顯的內(nèi)部差異。為了解釋這種差異,Perlmutter(1978)提出了著名的的“非賓格動詞假說”(TheUnaccusative Hypothesis).此后,語言學(xué)家對非賓格動詞作了大量的研究,非賓格性成為語言學(xué)界研究的熱點(diǎn)問題。一些學(xué)者(Burzio1986；Belletti1988；Levin和Rappaport1995,2005；Alexiadou2004；黃正德1997,2007；沈陽和Sybesma2012等)針對不同語言對非賓格動詞進(jìn)行了分類,并提出了相應(yīng)的非賓格動詞診斷手段,但這些研究無論在句法還是語義上都存在一些問題。本論文在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,對非賓格動詞進(jìn)行了重新定義。本文同時對漢語事件結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的討論(狀態(tài)體、成就體、達(dá)成體、活動體),發(fā)現(xiàn)漢語非賓格動詞屬于成就體中的一類,表現(xiàn)了事件狀態(tài)的變化。基于此特點(diǎn),本文嘗試提出了漢語非賓格結(jié)構(gòu)的診斷手段：能出現(xiàn)在方位倒裝句中并且只跟體標(biāo)記“了”共存的即為非賓格動詞。結(jié)果表明,此非賓格性測試手段不僅能夠很有效的測試漢語非賓格動詞,還能夠很好的解釋漢語一些爭議的非賓格動詞,進(jìn)一步解釋了漢語非賓格動詞的生成機(jī)制,驗證了非賓格假說的正確性,進(jìn)而揭示了人類語言的本質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:A large number of studies have shown that there are obvious internal differences in traditional intransitive verbs. In order to explain the difference, Perlmutter (1978) proposed the famous "unobjective verb hypothesis" (TheUnaccusative Hypothesis). Since then, linguists have done a lot of research on non-object verbs, and non-objectivity has become a hot topic in the field of linguistics. Some scholars (Burzio1986;Belletti1988;Levin and Rappaport1995,2005;Alexiadou2004; Huang Zhengde 1997 / 2007; Shenyang and Sybesma2012, etc.) this paper classifies the unobjective verbs in different languages, and puts forward the corresponding diagnostic methods of the unobjective verbs. However, there are still some problems in the syntactic and semantic aspects of these studies. On the basis of previous studies, this thesis redefines non-object verbs. At the same time, this paper discusses the Chinese event structure in detail (state aspect, achievement aspect, activity aspect). It is found that Chinese non-object verbs belong to the category of achievement aspect and show the change of event state. Based on this feature, this paper attempts to put forward a diagnostic method for Chinese unobjectibles: those that can appear in the orientation inversion and only coexist with the aspect marker "have" are non-object verbs. The results show that this method can not only effectively test the Chinese unobjective verbs, but also explain some controversial unobjective verbs in Chinese, and further explain the formation mechanism of Chinese unobjective verbs. It verifies the validity of the non-objective hypothesis and reveals the nature of human language.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 唐玉柱;存現(xiàn)動詞的非賓格性假設(shè)[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年04期

2 楊素英;從非賓格動詞現(xiàn)象看語義與句法結(jié)構(gòu)之間的關(guān)系[J];當(dāng)代語言學(xué);1999年01期

3 隋娜;王廣成;;漢語存現(xiàn)句中動詞的非賓格性[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2009年03期

4 劉探宙;;一元非作格動詞帶賓語現(xiàn)象[J];中國語文;2009年02期

5 黃正德;;漢語動詞的題元結(jié)構(gòu)與其句法表現(xiàn)[J];語言科學(xué);2007年04期

6 顧陽;;時態(tài)、時制理論與漢語時間參照[J];語言科學(xué);2007年04期

7 潘海華,韓景泉;顯性非賓格動詞結(jié)構(gòu)的句法研究[J];語言研究;2005年03期

，

本文編號：2400524