從《中國翻譯》（1980-2010）看中國翻譯理論研究走向
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-09 10:31
【摘要】：從20世紀(jì)80年代至今，中國翻譯研究取得了突飛猛進(jìn)的發(fā)展�！吨袊g》（原名《翻譯通訊》，以下統(tǒng)稱《中國翻譯》），作為全國性的翻譯專業(yè)刊物，已成為我國翻譯理論和翻譯教育界最大的、最有影響力的學(xué)術(shù)交流平臺。自1980年正式對外發(fā)行以來，《中國翻譯》本著百花齊放、百家爭鳴的原則，為我國翻譯研究的發(fā)展發(fā)揮著不可替代的導(dǎo)向作用和影響，其所發(fā)表的論文，具有學(xué)術(shù)代表性，是了解我國翻譯研究的重要窗口。本文正是從這一特殊的視角，來考察中國翻譯研究在這30年來的發(fā)展走向，同時提出作者的問題與反思。 首先是對中國傳統(tǒng)譯論研究的關(guān)注。從《中國翻譯》來看，20世紀(jì)80年代至90年代初期，由于受西方翻譯理論的影響不大，傳統(tǒng)譯論的研究還是延續(xù)已有的研究對象，傾向于對“術(shù)”的追求以及對之前某些爭論的重新解釋。隨著西方翻譯理論的不斷引入，中國傳統(tǒng)譯論在經(jīng)歷了一段時期的“邊緣化”歷史之后，又重新回到研究者的視野，傳統(tǒng)譯論的重新闡釋和現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)化成為研究熱點。其次是關(guān)于西方翻譯理論的研究。中國研究者由初始期對西方翻譯理論近乎全盤西化的學(xué)習(xí)，轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)榭茖W(xué)和理性的批判性借鑒，研究也由零星的對某一理論、某理論家的某一觀點轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)閺恼w上進(jìn)行研究并給予系統(tǒng)的評論。同時，對某一理論的淵源與發(fā)展以及與其他派別理論的關(guān)系和區(qū)別等都有研究。最后是對翻譯學(xué)的考察。從“建立翻譯學(xué)”的提出到翻譯學(xué)作為一門獨(dú)立的學(xué)科在中國建立起來，過程是曲折的，爭論是激烈的�！吨袊g》為其提供了一個爭論的平臺。但正是由于這些爭論，許多問題得到進(jìn)一步深化，相關(guān)概念也得到澄清，這無疑對于一門學(xué)科的建立及發(fā)展提供了有利的條件。
[Abstract]:Since the 1980s, Chinese translation studies have made rapid progress. Translation of China (formerly known as "Translation Communication", hereinafter referred to as "Translation of China"), as a national translation professional publication, It has become the largest and most influential academic communication platform in translation theory and translation education in China. Since its official publication in 1980, China Translation has played an irreplaceable guiding role and influence on the development of translation studies in China on the principle of letting a hundred flowers blossom and a hundred schools of thought contend. It is an important window to understand translation studies in China. From this special perspective, this paper examines the development trend of Chinese translation studies in the past 30 years, and puts forward the author's problems and reflections at the same time. First of all, it focuses on the study of Chinese traditional translation theory. From the perspective of "Chinese Translation", from the 1980s to the early 1990s, the study of traditional translation theory has continued because of its little influence from western translation theories. A tendency to pursue "skill" and reinterpret some of the previous arguments. With the continuous introduction of western translation theories, after a period of "marginalizing" history, Chinese traditional translation theory has returned to the perspective of researchers. The reinterpretation of traditional translation theory and its modern transformation have become the focus of research. The second is the study of western translation theory. Chinese researchers have changed from almost completely westernized western translation theory to scientific and rational critical reference, and the research has also changed from sporadic research to a certain theory. A theorist's point of view is transformed into a holistic study and a systematic review. At the same time, the origin and development of a certain theory, and the relationship and difference between the theory and other schools of thought are studied. The last part is the study of translation. From the "Establishment of Translation Studies" to the establishment of translation studies as an independent discipline in China, the process is tortuous and the debate is fierce. However, it is precisely because of these arguments that many problems have been further deepened and related concepts have been clarified, which undoubtedly provides favorable conditions for the establishment and development of a discipline.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川外語學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H059
本文編號：2369235
[Abstract]:Since the 1980s, Chinese translation studies have made rapid progress. Translation of China (formerly known as "Translation Communication", hereinafter referred to as "Translation of China"), as a national translation professional publication, It has become the largest and most influential academic communication platform in translation theory and translation education in China. Since its official publication in 1980, China Translation has played an irreplaceable guiding role and influence on the development of translation studies in China on the principle of letting a hundred flowers blossom and a hundred schools of thought contend. It is an important window to understand translation studies in China. From this special perspective, this paper examines the development trend of Chinese translation studies in the past 30 years, and puts forward the author's problems and reflections at the same time. First of all, it focuses on the study of Chinese traditional translation theory. From the perspective of "Chinese Translation", from the 1980s to the early 1990s, the study of traditional translation theory has continued because of its little influence from western translation theories. A tendency to pursue "skill" and reinterpret some of the previous arguments. With the continuous introduction of western translation theories, after a period of "marginalizing" history, Chinese traditional translation theory has returned to the perspective of researchers. The reinterpretation of traditional translation theory and its modern transformation have become the focus of research. The second is the study of western translation theory. Chinese researchers have changed from almost completely westernized western translation theory to scientific and rational critical reference, and the research has also changed from sporadic research to a certain theory. A theorist's point of view is transformed into a holistic study and a systematic review. At the same time, the origin and development of a certain theory, and the relationship and difference between the theory and other schools of thought are studied. The last part is the study of translation. From the "Establishment of Translation Studies" to the establishment of translation studies as an independent discipline in China, the process is tortuous and the debate is fierce. However, it is precisely because of these arguments that many problems have been further deepened and related concepts have been clarified, which undoubtedly provides favorable conditions for the establishment and development of a discipline.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川外語學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H059
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 孫迎春;“翻譯標(biāo)準(zhǔn)多元互補(bǔ)論”研究[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2003年08期
2 許淵沖;;翻譯的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];中國翻譯;1981年01期
3 王宗炎;;紐馬克論翻譯理論和翻譯技巧[J];中國翻譯;1982年01期
4 譚載喜;;翻譯是一門科學(xué)——評介奈達(dá)著《翻譯科學(xué)探索》[J];中國翻譯;1982年04期
5 馮世則;;風(fēng)格的翻譯:必要、困難、可能與必然[J];中國翻譯;1982年05期
6 包振南;;試論可譯性的限度[J];中國翻譯;1983年05期
7 勞隴;;“雅”義新釋[J];中國翻譯;1983年10期
8 高健;;淺談風(fēng)格的可譯性及其他——翻譯英美散文的一點體會[J];中國翻譯;1985年01期
9 桂乾元;;為確立具有中國特色的翻譯學(xué)而努力——從國外翻譯學(xué)談起[J];中國翻譯;1986年03期
10 郭建中;;論西方的翻譯對等概念[J];中國翻譯;1986年05期
，本文編號：2369235
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2369235.html
最近更新
教材專著
