責(zé)備類羨余否定的多角度分析
[Abstract]:Reproachful envy negation is a marginal atypical surplus negation, which has not been attached importance to by linguists for a long time. This paper takes this kind of envious negation as the research object and analyzes it from four aspects: syntax, semantics, pragmatics and cognition. We generalize and summarize the syntactic and semantic features of blame envy negation, analyze the pragmatic effects of blame envy negation, and explain its causes from a cognitive perspective. The research content of this paper mainly includes the following five parts: chapter one, introduction. In this part, we mainly introduce the research object, research significance, research methods and contents, the research status quo and the source of corpus. The second chapter briefly introduces envious surplus and envy surplus negation. In order to give readers a general understanding of the research object of this paper, we clearly define the definitions of envy surplus and envy surplus negation in this chapter, and make a detailed classification of them. The third chapter is the syntactic and semantic analysis of reproachful surplus negation. In this chapter, we analyze each component of blame envy negation and summarize their syntactic and semantic characteristics. Among them V all contain certain negation meaning, "should not" appear with it, become an envious element. X is usually composed of complex phrases or sentences in positive form, indicating the dissatisfactory behavior of events in the past. X has the characteristics of subjective negativity and controllability. Chapter four, the pragmatic cognitive analysis of reproachful surplus negation. Reproachful negation violates the principle of moderation, but it clearly expresses the speaker's negative attitude to events and negative evaluation, which can enhance the mood of the sentence and achieve a better expression effect. In addition, envious negation is also a structural form of language subjectivity and a result of subjectivization. This paper analyzes the subjectivity of reproachful envy and negation from the perspective of the speaker, emotion and cognition. We believe that blame type envy negation is caused by the addition of implicit meaning. Chapter V, conclusion. In this chapter, we summarize the main contents and shortcomings of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:H04;H030
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李治平;;“難免”和“難免不”[J];長沙理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年02期
2 張幼軍;反向心理動詞初探[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;1998年06期
3 石毓智;對“差點(diǎn)兒”類羨余否定句式的分化[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1993年04期
4 張伯江;否定的強(qiáng)化[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1996年01期
5 余康發(fā);陳烈;;絕對冗余和相對冗余[J];景德鎮(zhèn)高專學(xué)報;2006年03期
6 潘先軍;;羨余現(xiàn)象生成的認(rèn)知解釋[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年06期
7 曾少波;肯定、否定和羨余[J];黔南民族師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年02期
8 方緒軍;析“好/好不+形容詞”的同義現(xiàn)象[J];上海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1996年03期
9 潘先軍;;句法結(jié)構(gòu)羨余分析[J];沈陽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年02期
10 劉明金,楊清華;《現(xiàn)代漢語詞典》“好不”詞條補(bǔ)正[J];宿州師專學(xué)報;2000年04期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 喬東鑫;現(xiàn)代漢語否定范疇的語用考察[D];東北師范大學(xué);2006年
2 曹婧一;羨余否定的語用認(rèn)知分析[D];首都師范大學(xué);2007年
3 王進(jìn)文;現(xiàn)代漢語羨余否定及其格式研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2008年
4 馬新娜;試論形容詞作賓語的述賓短語[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2010年
,本文編號:2369081
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2369081.html