【摘要】：語(yǔ)言不只是交際手段，還是權(quán)力關(guān)系的體現(xiàn)。融語(yǔ)言、畫(huà)面和聲音為一體的商業(yè)廣告，，作為商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物，也不再只是宣傳產(chǎn)品或服務(wù)的工具，還承載著巨大的贏利期望，反映著一定的權(quán)力關(guān)系。廣告是商品生產(chǎn)者用以操縱并控制消費(fèi)者的工具，廣告本身并無(wú)霸權(quán)，它反映的是廣告背后生產(chǎn)者或廠商建立在資本之上的霸權(quán)。所以，對(duì)廣告語(yǔ)篇進(jìn)行分析，探討語(yǔ)言背后的權(quán)力和意識(shí)形態(tài)具有重要意義。它能幫助人們認(rèn)清廣告的本質(zhì)，解讀廣告的含義，從而使消費(fèi)者作出理性的消費(fèi)選擇。 本文從語(yǔ)用學(xué)的角度，借用美國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)家格賴(lài)斯的“合作原則”來(lái)分析商業(yè)廣告語(yǔ)篇中語(yǔ)用霸權(quán)的建構(gòu)。目前國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)語(yǔ)言霸權(quán)的研究大都集中在新聞?wù)Z篇和翻譯中，因而產(chǎn)生了“話語(yǔ)霸權(quán)”、“文化霸權(quán)”的概念。本文根據(jù)研究?jī)?nèi)容和目的提出了“語(yǔ)用霸權(quán)”這一概念，以區(qū)別于上述兩種霸權(quán)。這三種霸權(quán)都是話語(yǔ)霸權(quán)在三種領(lǐng)域的具體化和表現(xiàn)方式。所謂“語(yǔ)用霸權(quán)”，是指商品生產(chǎn)者或廠商以經(jīng)濟(jì)資本為基礎(chǔ)，將其經(jīng)濟(jì)資本、文化資本、社會(huì)資本和符號(hào)資本進(jìn)行“編碼”，形成廣告話語(yǔ)，以大眾媒體為載體，通過(guò)不斷的重復(fù)，強(qiáng)行向廣告受眾推銷(xiāo)自己的商品或企業(yè)文化，從而參與消費(fèi)者意識(shí)形態(tài)的建構(gòu)并最終操縱或控制消費(fèi)者。 本文以自建的小型廣告集為研究對(duì)象，分析廠商是如何利用“合作原則”成功建構(gòu)其語(yǔ)用霸權(quán)的。首先，文章回顧了學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)霸權(quán)的研究現(xiàn)狀，在新聞?wù)Z篇和廣告中的研究成果。其次，詳細(xì)闡述了語(yǔ)言學(xué)家格賴(lài)斯的“合作原則”，及其在廣告研究中的現(xiàn)狀和成就。然后，結(jié)合商業(yè)廣告實(shí)例，分別從數(shù)量、質(zhì)量、關(guān)系和方式四個(gè)準(zhǔn)則分析商業(yè)廣告在這四方面的表現(xiàn)形式以及如何利用“合作原則”來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)其語(yǔ)用霸權(quán)的成功建構(gòu)的。
[Abstract]:Language is not only a means of communication, but also a reflection of power relations. As a product of the development of commercial economy, commercial advertisement, which integrates language, picture and sound, is no longer just a tool for publicizing products or services, but also carries huge profit expectations and reflects a certain power relationship. Advertising is a tool used by commodity producers to manipulate and control consumers. Advertising itself has no hegemony. It reflects the hegemony of producers or manufacturers based on capital behind advertising. Therefore, it is of great significance to analyze the advertising discourse and explore the power and ideology behind the language. It can help people to understand the nature of advertising, understand the meaning of advertising, so that consumers make rational consumption choices. From the perspective of pragmatics, this paper analyzes the construction of pragmatic hegemony in commercial advertising discourse from the perspective of American linguist Grice's Cooperative principle. At present, most of the researches on language hegemony at home and abroad are focused on news discourse and translation, thus giving rise to the concepts of "discourse hegemony" and "cultural hegemony". This paper puts forward the concept of "pragmatic hegemony" according to the content and purpose of the study, so as to distinguish it from the above two kinds of hegemony. These three kinds of hegemony are the embodiment and manifestation of discourse hegemony in three fields. The so-called "pragmatic hegemony" means that commodity producers or manufacturers "encode" their economic capital, cultural capital, social capital and symbolic capital on the basis of economic capital, and form advertising discourse with mass media as their carrier. Through repeated, the advertising audience is forced to sell their own goods or corporate culture, so as to participate in the construction of consumer ideology and ultimately manipulate or control consumers. This paper takes the self-built small advertising set as the research object, and analyzes how the firm successfully constructs its pragmatic hegemony by using the "Cooperative principle". Firstly, this paper reviews the current situation of academic research on hegemony and its achievements in news discourse and advertising. Secondly, Grice's Cooperative principle, as well as its current situation and achievements in advertising research, are described in detail. Then, with the example of commercial advertising, the paper analyzes the expression of commercial advertising in these four aspects from the four criteria of quantity, quality, relationship and mode, and how to use the "Cooperative principle" to realize the successful construction of its pragmatic hegemony.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H13

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張霜,馬麗娃;廣告語(yǔ)言的本質(zhì)特征及意義[J];成都大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

2 姜華;西方大眾文化理論研究的葛蘭西轉(zhuǎn)向[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

3 張?zhí)?;文化霸權(quán)理論溯源[J];東南傳播;2009年05期

4 朱國(guó)華;習(xí)性與資本:略論布迪厄的主要概念工具(上)[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

5 黃順銘,譚舒;一個(gè)歷史的維度——美國(guó)媒介批評(píng)著作概況[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年10期

6 蔣紅梅;;試論合作原則廣告語(yǔ)中的運(yùn)用[J];湖北函授大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

7 孫衛(wèi)衛(wèi);廣告的文化霸權(quán)[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年10期

8 費(fèi)愛(ài)華;;廣告話語(yǔ)霸權(quán)的生成機(jī)制研究[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年06期

9 莫海文;;商業(yè)廣告語(yǔ)言的蘊(yùn)涵與格賴(lài)斯合作原則的背離[J];通化師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

10 韋路,嚴(yán)燕蓉;媒介:訊息還是權(quán)力[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 蘇永青;廣告語(yǔ)言創(chuàng)意與社會(huì)文化心理[D];華中師范大學(xué);2002年

2 范艷波;英語(yǔ)廣告語(yǔ)言中合作原則的遵守與違反[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

本文編號(hào)：2235881