【摘要】：一些符號(hào)學(xué)家區(qū)別了傳達(dá)符號(hào)學(xué)與意指符號(hào)學(xué),不同之處主要表現(xiàn)在代碼、對(duì)象、理論來源、發(fā)送者意圖等方面。這種區(qū)別對(duì)于符號(hào)化過程和符號(hào)學(xué)研究方法的探討確實(shí)大有裨益。然而,這種研究很容易走向極端,即只看到二者之間差異,看不到二者的統(tǒng)一之處。本文重點(diǎn)考察了傳達(dá)符號(hào)學(xué)與意指符號(hào)學(xué)在符號(hào)形成過程、代碼、能指所指關(guān)系、文學(xué)作品等方面的相通之處和統(tǒng)一關(guān)系。筆者發(fā)現(xiàn),符號(hào)的傳達(dá)作用與意指作用不是絕對(duì)對(duì)立的,而是處于相互依存、彼消此長、不斷轉(zhuǎn)換等對(duì)立統(tǒng)一關(guān)系之中;傳達(dá)符號(hào)學(xué)與意指符號(hào)學(xué)只具方法論上的差異,而在符號(hào)學(xué)本體論上是統(tǒng)一的,二者緊密地交織于文化之中。
[Abstract]:Some semiotics distinguish communication semiotics from implicative semiotics. The differences are mainly in code, object, theoretical source, sender's intention and so on. This distinction is of great benefit to the study of semiotics and semiotics. However, this kind of research is easy to go to the extreme, that is, only to see the difference between the two, not to see the unity of the two. This paper focuses on the similarities and unified relationships between semiotics and semiotics in the process of symbol formation, code, signifier relation, literary works, etc. The author finds that the communication function and the signifying function of the symbol are not absolutely opposite, but are in the unity of opposites, such as interdependence, elimination of this long character, constant transformation, and so on, and there are only methodological differences between the communication semiotics and the signifying semiotics. But in the semiotics ontology is unified, the two closely intertwined in the culture.
【作者單位】： 常熟理工學(xué)院外國語學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究基金資助項(xiàng)目“傳達(dá)符號(hào)學(xué)與意指符號(hào)學(xué)比較研究”(09YJC740012) 江蘇省2010年度研究生科研創(chuàng)新計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目“莫里斯符號(hào)學(xué)思想研究”(CX10B068R) 南京師范大學(xué)2010年度優(yōu)秀博士研究生學(xué)位論文培育項(xiàng)目(2010bs0023) 江蘇省“青藍(lán)工程”資助項(xiàng)目
【分類號(hào)】：H0

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 張良林;胡志紅;;傳達(dá)符號(hào)學(xué)與意指符號(hào)學(xué)的差異——洛特曼文化符號(hào)學(xué)視角[J];俄羅斯文藝;2011年02期

2 程丹;唐丹;;胡適和李大釗在“問題與主義”之爭中的相通之處[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2006年04期

3 高娟;;小議系統(tǒng)功能語言學(xué)派與轉(zhuǎn)換生成語言學(xué)派之異同[J];文教資料;2009年14期

4 楊紅;;論語篇語用學(xué)與語篇語義學(xué)的相通之處[J];信陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

5 張良林;胡志紅;;論柏拉圖與亞里士多德美學(xué)思想的相通之處[J];西華師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2203943