【摘要】：目前學(xué)界所討論的處所賓語(yǔ)主要有七類,其中有六類尚存爭(zhēng)議,爭(zhēng)論主要源自兩個(gè)方面:一是缺乏有效判定處所賓語(yǔ)的形式標(biāo)準(zhǔn);二是處所賓語(yǔ)常常和其他賓語(yǔ)尤其是受事賓語(yǔ)發(fā)生邊界上的糾纏。方位詞是處所屬性標(biāo)記,根據(jù)處所屬性標(biāo)記的隱現(xiàn)情況可以判斷賓語(yǔ)處所性的有無(wú)和強(qiáng)弱。通過(guò)一套相應(yīng)的語(yǔ)法指標(biāo)的考察也可以判定賓語(yǔ)受事性的強(qiáng)弱。著眼于上述兩個(gè)因素,以往研究中的相當(dāng)一部分處所賓語(yǔ)并不具有處所性,因此不應(yīng)稱其為處所賓語(yǔ);所有擁有處所性的賓語(yǔ)實(shí)際上也都具有不同強(qiáng)度的受事性,對(duì)其身份的認(rèn)定與所采用的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有關(guān)。
[Abstract]:At present, there are seven kinds of locational objects discussed in academic circles, six of which are still controversial, which are mainly derived from two aspects: first, the lack of formal standards to effectively judge the object of premises; Second, the local object is often entangled with other objects, especially the subject object. The locative word is a locative attribute mark, which can be used to judge the existence and strength of the object locality according to the hidden condition of the locative attribute mark. By examining a set of corresponding grammatical indicators, we can also judge the subjectiveness of object. In view of the above two factors, a considerable part of the local objects in previous studies are not local objects, so they should not be called local objects. The determination of his identity is related to the criteria used.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)中文系;
【分類號(hào)】：H146.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 牛秀蘭;;關(guān)于“是…的”結(jié)構(gòu)句的賓語(yǔ)位置問(wèn)題[J];世界漢語(yǔ)教學(xué);1991年03期

2 王建軍;古漢語(yǔ)中的處所類雙賓語(yǔ)句探析[J];語(yǔ)文學(xué)刊;2005年09期

3 馬云霞;;人稱代詞及指人指物名詞與方所稱代的演變[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)論壇(學(xué)術(shù)研究卷);2007年12期

4 吳紀(jì)梅;;動(dòng)詞“坐”帶處所賓語(yǔ)能力的歷時(shí)發(fā)展考察[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年04期

5 徐靖;;“移動(dòng)樣態(tài)動(dòng)詞+處所賓語(yǔ)”的語(yǔ)義功能[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2009年03期

6 姜U，

本文編號(hào)：2136737