論竹添光鴻《左氏會(huì)箋》的成就與不足
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-14 19:56
【摘要】：在經(jīng)學(xué)史研究中，《左傳》作為儒家經(jīng)典之一，人們對(duì)其進(jìn)行的研究歷久不衰。本文選取日本漢學(xué)家竹添光鴻所箋注的《左氏會(huì)箋》作專題研究。側(cè)重於其箋注部分，重點(diǎn)闡明其訓(xùn)釋的成就與不足。 基於竹添氏采用金澤文庫(kù)本《春秋經(jīng)傳集解》為其工作底本，，而金澤文庫(kù)本《春秋經(jīng)傳集解》乃唐代流傳至日本的隋唐舊鈔卷子本《左傳》，其版本乃目前《左傳》存世最古且完整的本子，而竹添氏又以四種宋刊本《左傳》、唐石經(jīng)、《經(jīng)典釋文》等諸多文獻(xiàn)對(duì)卷子本進(jìn)行�？�，不止使原隋唐舊鈔卷子本更趨於精良，亦提供了一個(gè)更為可靠的《左傳》文本。故本文便梳理竹添氏所作的校記，試圖歸納出其《左氏會(huì)箋》的�？眱r(jià)值及�？狈椒�，從而看出竹添氏對(duì)《左傳》�？钡某删�。此為第一章。 作為深受乾嘉學(xué)風(fēng)影響的日本學(xué)者之一，竹添氏在其箋注內(nèi)容中所采用的訓(xùn)釋方法，都可以看到乾嘉學(xué)者樸實(shí)考據(jù)的影子。因此本文在竹添氏箋注的基礎(chǔ)上，從其訓(xùn)詁詞匯及分析章句的方法去歸納其訓(xùn)釋的方法特點(diǎn)。在訓(xùn)詁詞匯方面，竹添氏側(cè)重於呱形索義、因聲求義、辨別詞義等方法去揭示字詞的內(nèi)容，其方法甚具科學(xué)性，甚至還提出了實(shí)字活用的概念，可謂對(duì)中國(guó)近代語(yǔ)法史研究頗有補(bǔ)益。而在分析章句上，除了前儒常見(jiàn)的判斷句讀、辨析虛詞等工作外，竹添氏還注意辨別句式、串講文句文意、闡明文句修辭，極具特色。因此通過(guò)分析《左氏會(huì)箋》，可以看出清儒治學(xué)方法對(duì)域外學(xué)者的影響，進(jìn)而論證竹添氏的箋注方法實(shí)是從清儒之學(xué)的土壤中發(fā)展出來(lái)的，這對(duì)中、日經(jīng)學(xué)發(fā)展研究有著重要的參考意義。此為第二章。 由於《左氏會(huì)箋》是研究《左傳》、域外漢學(xué)都不能繞開(kāi)的重要著作，本文便著重剖析其訓(xùn)詁闡釋之近真的箋注面貌。竹添氏所選擇的卷子本《左傳》，本僅有經(jīng)文、傳文及杜預(yù)的集解，故竹添氏便在經(jīng)、傳、注之下都分別為之作箋。竹添氏作箋注的形式，看上去與唐人作正義相似，然與唐人作正義所不同的是唐人往往疏不破注，而竹添氏的箋注卻擇善而從，杜注不誤即予以肯定；杜注有問(wèn)題的地方，竹添氏便往往破注另立一說(shuō)。同時(shí)，竹添氏也善於在前人未疑之處發(fā)現(xiàn)問(wèn)題，并嘗試旁徵博引以解決之。有鑒於此，本文嘗試歸納竹添氏破杜之內(nèi)容，進(jìn)而考察竹添氏訓(xùn)釋的近真情況。此為第三章。 然而竹添氏《左氏會(huì)箋》依舊存在著一些不足之處，雖然瑕不掩瑜，但我們不必為賢者諱，才能更加實(shí)事求是地認(rèn)識(shí)此書(shū)的價(jià)值。因此本文便舉例論述竹添氏在《左氏會(huì)箋》訓(xùn)詁上的一些問(wèn)題，進(jìn)而嘗試追溯導(dǎo)致這些問(wèn)題產(chǎn)生的原因，看出竹添氏局限性之所在。此為第四章。 本文的撰作乃由讀經(jīng)而來(lái)，采用的方法以例證法為主，而梳理材料并有所闡明是本文的主要工作，以期為《左傳》學(xué)史研究稍作貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Zuo Zhuan, as one of the Confucian classics, has been studied for a long time in the study of the history of Confucian classics. In this paper, Zhu Tianguanghong, a Japanese sinologist, is selected as a special topic. Focus on its note part, the focus on its interpretation of the achievements and shortcomings. Based on Zhu Tian's work, Kanazawa library "interpretation of Spring and Autumn Meridian" is used as its working base. And Kanazawa's book, "interpretation of the Spring and Autumn Chronicles", is the Sui and Tang banknote paper book "Zuo Zhuan", which was handed down to Japan in the Tang Dynasty. Its version is the oldest and most complete book in the world at present. Zhu Tim collates the test books with four kinds of Song editions, such as Zuo Zhuan, Tang Shi Jing, Classical interpretation, and so on, which not only makes the old paper books of Sui and Tang dynasties more sophisticated, but also provides a more reliable version of Zuo Zhuan. Therefore, this paper combs Zhu Tian's collation notes, tries to sum up the collation value and method of Zhu Tian's "Zuo Shi Hui Ji", and thus finds out Zhu Tian's achievements in "Zuo Zhuan" collation. This is the first chapter. As one of the Japanese scholars deeply influenced by the style of study in Qianjia, Zhu Tien's explanation method in his notes can see the shadow of the simple textual research of Qianjia scholars. Therefore, on the basis of Zhu Tian's notes, this paper sums up the characteristics of his explanation from the methods of his exegetical vocabulary and the method of analyzing Zhang sentence. In the aspect of exegetical vocabulary, Zhu Tim focuses on quack meaning, seeking meaning by sound, distinguishing word meaning and so on to reveal the content of words. The method is scientific and even puts forward the concept of using real words. It can be said to be quite helpful to the study of Chinese modern grammar history. In the analysis of Zhang sentence, apart from the common judgment sentence reading and function word analysis, Zhu Tim also pays attention to distinguishing sentence structure, stringing sentence meaning and clarifying rhetorical figure of writing sentence. Therefore, through the analysis of the "Zuo Family Club Notes", we can see the influence of the Confucian scholarship method of the Qing Dynasty on the foreign scholars, and then prove that Zhu Tian's annotating method was actually developed from the soil of the Confucian school of the Qing Dynasty. The study on the development of Japanese classics is of great significance. This is the second chapter. As Zuo Zuo Hui Ji is an important work of studying Zuo Zuo Zuo Z@@ Bamboo Tim selected the paper "Zuo Zhuan", this text only scripture, text and du Di set solution, so bamboo Tim in the Sutra, biography, note are respectively used as a note. The form of bamboo Tim's note seems to be similar to that of the Tang people, but what is different from the justice of the Tang people is that the Tang people tend not to break notes, but the notes of bamboo Tim tend to follow the good, and du's notes are affirmed without mistake; du notes have problems. Bamboo Tim often breaks down another statement. At the same time, Zhu Tim is also good at finding problems in the past and trying to solve them. In view of this, this paper attempts to sum up the content of bamboo Tim's breaking down, and then to investigate the near true situation of bamboo Tim's explanation. This is the third chapter. However, there are still some shortcomings in Zhu Tian's "Zuo's Club". Although the defects are not hidden, we do not have to be taboo for the virtuous, in order to realize the value of this book more realistically. Therefore, this paper illustrates some problems of Zhu Tian's exegesis in Zuo Shi Hui Ji, and tries to trace back the causes of these problems and see the limitation of Zhu Tim. This is the fourth chapter. The compilation of this paper is based on the reading of the classics, and the method used is mainly exemplification, and combing and clarifying the materials is the main work of this paper, in order to make a little contribution to the study of the history of the study of Zuo Zhuan.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H13
本文編號(hào)：2122779
[Abstract]:Zuo Zhuan, as one of the Confucian classics, has been studied for a long time in the study of the history of Confucian classics. In this paper, Zhu Tianguanghong, a Japanese sinologist, is selected as a special topic. Focus on its note part, the focus on its interpretation of the achievements and shortcomings. Based on Zhu Tian's work, Kanazawa library "interpretation of Spring and Autumn Meridian" is used as its working base. And Kanazawa's book, "interpretation of the Spring and Autumn Chronicles", is the Sui and Tang banknote paper book "Zuo Zhuan", which was handed down to Japan in the Tang Dynasty. Its version is the oldest and most complete book in the world at present. Zhu Tim collates the test books with four kinds of Song editions, such as Zuo Zhuan, Tang Shi Jing, Classical interpretation, and so on, which not only makes the old paper books of Sui and Tang dynasties more sophisticated, but also provides a more reliable version of Zuo Zhuan. Therefore, this paper combs Zhu Tian's collation notes, tries to sum up the collation value and method of Zhu Tian's "Zuo Shi Hui Ji", and thus finds out Zhu Tian's achievements in "Zuo Zhuan" collation. This is the first chapter. As one of the Japanese scholars deeply influenced by the style of study in Qianjia, Zhu Tien's explanation method in his notes can see the shadow of the simple textual research of Qianjia scholars. Therefore, on the basis of Zhu Tian's notes, this paper sums up the characteristics of his explanation from the methods of his exegetical vocabulary and the method of analyzing Zhang sentence. In the aspect of exegetical vocabulary, Zhu Tim focuses on quack meaning, seeking meaning by sound, distinguishing word meaning and so on to reveal the content of words. The method is scientific and even puts forward the concept of using real words. It can be said to be quite helpful to the study of Chinese modern grammar history. In the analysis of Zhang sentence, apart from the common judgment sentence reading and function word analysis, Zhu Tim also pays attention to distinguishing sentence structure, stringing sentence meaning and clarifying rhetorical figure of writing sentence. Therefore, through the analysis of the "Zuo Family Club Notes", we can see the influence of the Confucian scholarship method of the Qing Dynasty on the foreign scholars, and then prove that Zhu Tian's annotating method was actually developed from the soil of the Confucian school of the Qing Dynasty. The study on the development of Japanese classics is of great significance. This is the second chapter. As Zuo Zuo Hui Ji is an important work of studying Zuo Zuo Zuo Z@@ Bamboo Tim selected the paper "Zuo Zhuan", this text only scripture, text and du Di set solution, so bamboo Tim in the Sutra, biography, note are respectively used as a note. The form of bamboo Tim's note seems to be similar to that of the Tang people, but what is different from the justice of the Tang people is that the Tang people tend not to break notes, but the notes of bamboo Tim tend to follow the good, and du's notes are affirmed without mistake; du notes have problems. Bamboo Tim often breaks down another statement. At the same time, Zhu Tim is also good at finding problems in the past and trying to solve them. In view of this, this paper attempts to sum up the content of bamboo Tim's breaking down, and then to investigate the near true situation of bamboo Tim's explanation. This is the third chapter. However, there are still some shortcomings in Zhu Tian's "Zuo's Club". Although the defects are not hidden, we do not have to be taboo for the virtuous, in order to realize the value of this book more realistically. Therefore, this paper illustrates some problems of Zhu Tian's exegesis in Zuo Shi Hui Ji, and tries to trace back the causes of these problems and see the limitation of Zhu Tim. This is the fourth chapter. The compilation of this paper is based on the reading of the classics, and the method used is mainly exemplification, and combing and clarifying the materials is the main work of this paper, in order to make a little contribution to the study of the history of the study of Zuo Zhuan.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H13
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 孫赫男;;竹添光鴻《左氏會(huì)箋》研究述要[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期
2 孫赫男;《左氏會(huì)箋》的�？碧攸c(diǎn)[J];北方論叢;2005年01期
3 孫赫男;;竹添光鴻《左氏會(huì)箋》義例淺釋[J];重慶文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期
4 孫赫男;;上野賢知《〈左氏會(huì)箋〉三稿》發(fā)墨[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期
5 孫赫男;;《左氏會(huì)箋》述例[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期
6 趙生群;;《左傳》訓(xùn)詁叢札[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年05期
7 孫赫男;;《左氏會(huì)箋》文字訓(xùn)詁論略[J];佳木斯大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期
8 孫赫男;;會(huì)而通之:《左氏會(huì)箋》注釋特點(diǎn)芻議[J];佳木斯大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期
9 孫赫男;;《左氏會(huì)箋》“求同存異”方法義例——以隱公元年為主[J];牡丹江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年06期
10 孫赫男;;《左氏會(huì)箋》訓(xùn)詁術(shù)語(yǔ)淺釋[J];牡丹江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 孫赫男;《左氏會(huì)箋》研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 夏虹;竹添光鴻與清末中國(guó)[D];浙江工商大學(xué);2010年
本文編號(hào)：2122779
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2122779.html
最近更新
教材專著
