發(fā)布時間：2018-07-06 15:41

  本文選題：指稱化 + 語義類別　； 參考：《上海師范大學》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：本文以現(xiàn)代漢語動詞的指稱化現(xiàn)象作為研究對象，在全面考察動詞的指稱化表現(xiàn)的基礎上，通過與世界其他語言同類現(xiàn)象的比較，找出漢語動詞指稱化現(xiàn)象的共性特征和個性特點，進而為漢語動名劃界找到事實和理論依據(jù)。 首先，本文以認知語言學范疇化理論為指導，確定漢語動詞和名詞的典型特征，然后根據(jù)動詞在指稱化過程中動詞性特征喪失情況和名詞性特征獲得情況，從語義上把動詞的指稱化分為具體事件指稱化、類事件指稱化和物化事件指稱化。 其次，本文全面系統(tǒng)地考察了現(xiàn)代漢語動詞的指稱化情況，在與世界其他語言指稱化現(xiàn)象進行對比的基礎上，本文又對漢語動詞的指稱化結(jié)構(gòu)從形式上進行分類，分為：小句型、“指量詞/數(shù)量詞+動詞”型、屬格-賓格型、屬格型、“虛義動詞+動詞”型和融合型等，同時討論了漢語動詞指稱化的語義類別和結(jié)構(gòu)類別之間的關系。 最后，本文在動詞指稱化研究和國內(nèi)外關于詞類的研究成果基礎上，堅持詞類本質(zhì)上是語法范疇，并且建議把漢語中可以物化事件指稱化的雙音節(jié)動詞處理為事件名詞。 本文的研究與以往研究相比，創(chuàng)新之處主要有：明確提出漢語動詞指稱化具有層級性；系統(tǒng)考察了漢語單雙音節(jié)動詞在指稱化方面的異同；探討了漢語動詞指稱化的動因是語言表達指事性的需要，，其指稱化的機制是認知轉(zhuǎn)喻和隱喻；第一次探索漢語動詞指稱化的類型學特征；為漢語動名劃界提出一個建設性意見。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the referential phenomenon of verbs in modern Chinese as the object of study. On the basis of a comprehensive investigation of the referential manifestations of verbs, this paper compares them with the similar phenomena in other languages of the world. This paper finds out the common and individual characteristics of the referential phenomenon of Chinese verbs, and then finds out the facts and theoretical basis for the demarcation of verb names in Chinese. First of all, under the guidance of the categorization theory of cognitive linguistics, this paper determines the typical features of Chinese verbs and nouns, and then according to the loss of verb characteristics and the acquisition of nominal features in the process of verb referencing. In terms of semantics, the verb referential is divided into specific event referential, class event referential and materialized event referential. Secondly, this paper comprehensively and systematically examines the referential situation of modern Chinese verbs. On the basis of comparison with other language referential phenomena in the world, this paper classifies the referential structure of Chinese verbs in form. It is divided into small sentence type, "quantifier / quantifier verb" type, case-object type, case type, "fictional verb" type and fusion type, etc. Meanwhile, the relationship between semantic and structural categories of Chinese verb referencing is discussed. Finally, on the basis of the research on verb referentification and the domestic and foreign researches on part of speech, this paper insists that the part of speech is essentially a grammatical category, and suggests that the two-syllable verbs which can be denoted by materialized events in Chinese should be treated as event nouns. Compared with the previous studies, the main innovations of this paper are as follows: it is clear that Chinese verb referential has hierarchy, and the similarities and differences of Chinese monosyllabic verbs in referential aspect are systematically investigated. This paper discusses that the motivation of Chinese verb referential is the need of language expression, and its referential mechanism is cognitive metonymy and metaphor, explores the typological characteristics of Chinese verb referential for the first time, and puts forward a constructive suggestion for the demarcation of Chinese verb noun.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 朱德熙 ,v緙孜

本文編號：2103274