本文選題：說文解字 + 部首��； 參考：《江西師范大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：東漢許慎撰著的《說文解字》（以下簡稱《說文》），乃文字學的奠基之作，歷代學者進行文字研究始終以《說文》為本。唐代開始，不斷有人圍繞《說文》部首研究漢字字原，逐漸形成了“字原學”。一直到南宋鄭樵才從文字孳乳繁衍的角度開始了真正意義上的字原研究。清代仍有人從事這方面的研究，卻依然把540部首都看作字原。近現(xiàn)代學者已經(jīng)明確部首與字原是兩個不同的概念，不能夠混為一談。本文在總結前人研究的成果以及局限的基礎上，對部首與字原的關系進行詳細闡述，試圖梳理清楚兩者的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系，并且判定出540部首中的真正字原。本論文共分為四個部分： 一、引言。敘述研究現(xiàn)狀，總結字原研究中存在的問題與不足。明確本文的研究意義、研究對象及范圍以及研究方法等。 二、部首與字原。首先，分析部首的定義、作用，《說文》部首的確立對后代字典編纂的重要意義以及與后代產(chǎn)生的檢字法部首的區(qū)別。其次，提出字原的定義，并且研究字原與漢字構形的關系。最后，在前文論述的基礎上，，總結部首與字原的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系。 三、《說文》部首當中的字原。在對漢字結構類型進行研究的基礎上，確立判定字原的標準，并付諸于判斷小篆字原的實踐中。對于已確定的字原，根據(jù)不同屬性將它們劃分為原始字原、分化字原與特殊字原三類。 四、《說文》中的字原與甲骨文、金文字原的比較。首先，分別對甲骨文、金文中的字原進行歸納，在與小篆字原對比之后分析出早期字原的基本特征。其次，把三個階段歸納得出的字原進行歷時的比較，探尋它們之間繼承與發(fā)展的關系。最后，在前文對比分析的基礎上得出字原在漢字發(fā)展到一定階段之后會逐步穩(wěn)定在一定數(shù)量的結論。
[Abstract]:In the Eastern Han Dynasty, Xu Shen wrote "Shuo Wen Jie Zi" (hereinafter referred to as Shuo Wen), which is the foundation of philology. At the beginning of Tang Dynasty, people began to study the origin of Chinese characters around the radical of Shuo Wen, and gradually formed the Chronology of Chinese characters. It was not until the Southern Song Dynasty that Zheng Qiao began to study the origin of characters from the angle of reproduction. In the Qing Dynasty, there were still people studying this area, but 540 capitals were still regarded as the originals. Modern scholars have made it clear that radical and original are two different concepts and cannot be confused. On the basis of summarizing the achievements and limitations of previous studies, this paper elaborates the relationship between the radical and the original, tries to sort out the difference and relation between the two, and determines the true character in 540 parts. This paper is divided into four parts: first, introduction. This paper describes the present situation of the research and summarizes the problems and shortcomings in the study of the original characters. Clear the significance of this study, research object and scope and research methods. First of all, it analyzes the definition and function of the radical, the significance of the establishment of the radical to the compilation of the dictionary for future generations, and the difference between the definition of the radical and the branch of the Chinese character checking method produced by the offspring. Secondly, the definition of the original is proposed, and the relationship between the original and the configuration of Chinese characters is studied. Finally, on the basis of the previous discussion, the author summarizes the differences and relations between the radical and the original. On the basis of the study of the structural types of Chinese characters, the standard of judging the original characters is established and put into practice. For the determined characters, according to their different attributes, they can be divided into three types: the original and the special. Fourth, the comparison of the original in Shuowen with the oracle bone inscription and the original of the gold character. Firstly, the author summarizes the characters in oracle bone inscriptions and Jin characters, and analyzes the basic characteristics of the early characters after contrasting with Xiaozhuan characters. Secondly, the three stages are compared to explore the relationship between inheritance and development. Finally, on the basis of comparative analysis, it is concluded that the original character will be stabilized in a certain number after the development of Chinese characters to a certain stage.
【學位授予單位】：江西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H161

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 馮蒸;《說文》部首今讀新訂并說明(下)[J];漢字文化;1997年03期

2 張顯成;《說文》部首字說解與所屬字說解違反同一律考[J];四川大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1992年02期

3 王玉堂;侵宵對轉說與詞的音義關系研究[J];古漢語研究;1991年03期

4 魯生;“買賣”之賣的檢討[J];商業(yè)研究;1992年04期

5 肖興;《說文》段注申許法舉例[J];古漢語研究;1995年S1期

6 將立甫;《文選箋證》校誤[J];古籍整理研究學刊;1996年03期

7 胡說;《說文》“諍”之誤訓“止”說[J];江西師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1996年01期

8 肖賢彬;“渝”有“污”義[J];辭書研究;1998年03期

9 陶霞波;“聞”與“門”[J];咬文嚼字;1999年12期

10 盧鳳鵬;;《說文》詞匯系統(tǒng)的認知研究[J];大家;2010年16期

相關會議論文 前10條

1 郭

本文編號：1999897