發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-19 07:46

  本文選題：謂賓動(dòng)詞 + 謂詞性賓語��； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：本文以現(xiàn)代漢語謂賓動(dòng)詞作為研究對(duì)象，在全面考察各類謂賓動(dòng)詞及其所帶的謂詞性賓語的基礎(chǔ)上，通過與世界其他語言同類現(xiàn)象的比較，試圖找出漢語謂賓動(dòng)詞的共性特征和個(gè)性特點(diǎn)，進(jìn)而深化漢語謂賓動(dòng)詞的研究。 首先，本文以認(rèn)知語言學(xué)范疇化理論為指導(dǎo)，在全面回顧類型學(xué)關(guān)于謂賓動(dòng)詞研究的基礎(chǔ)上，找出世界語言中謂賓動(dòng)詞的共性特點(diǎn)和個(gè)性差異：共性特點(diǎn)是謂賓動(dòng)詞后面的謂詞性賓語從結(jié)構(gòu)類型上都可以分為三類，，即動(dòng)詞短語、不完全小句和完全小句；個(gè)性差異就是同類型的謂賓動(dòng)詞所帶的謂詞性賓語在結(jié)構(gòu)類型上可以不完全一致。 其次，本文根據(jù)謂賓動(dòng)詞所帶的賓語在結(jié)構(gòu)性質(zhì)上不同，把漢語的謂賓動(dòng)詞分為五大類：只能帶動(dòng)詞性賓語的謂賓動(dòng)詞、只能帶兼語賓語的謂賓動(dòng)詞、只能帶小句賓語的謂賓動(dòng)詞、能帶動(dòng)詞性賓語和兼語賓語的謂賓動(dòng)詞和能帶動(dòng)詞性賓語和小句賓語的謂賓動(dòng)詞；并且分別對(duì)只能帶動(dòng)詞性賓語的謂賓動(dòng)詞、只能帶兼語賓語的謂賓動(dòng)詞以及只能帶小句賓語的謂賓動(dòng)詞進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的考察，同時(shí)根據(jù)其后賓語的指稱化程度或賓語與動(dòng)詞是否具有致使義或賓語是否能夠獨(dú)立成句，對(duì)這三類動(dòng)詞做了進(jìn)一步的下位分類。 最后，本文還從英、韓、漢對(duì)比的角度探討了三種語言同類型謂賓動(dòng)詞在帶謂詞性賓語上存在的共性和差異；同時(shí)也探討了漢語有些謂賓動(dòng)詞只能帶疑問句形式賓語的現(xiàn)象；文章結(jié)尾還對(duì)漢語學(xué)界提出“謂賓動(dòng)詞”的積極性和消極性提出了自己的一點(diǎn)看法。 本文的研究與以往研究相比，創(chuàng)新之處主要有：總結(jié)出世界語言中謂賓動(dòng)詞所帶賓語從結(jié)構(gòu)上可以分為三類：動(dòng)詞短語、不完全小句和完全小句；明確指出只能帶動(dòng)詞性賓語的漢語謂賓動(dòng)詞，其賓語可以根據(jù)指稱化程度分為三類：具體事件指稱化、類事件指稱化和物化事件指稱化；本文把兼語式處理為動(dòng)詞加兼語賓語，并從詞匯賦義和結(jié)構(gòu)賦義角度把兼賓動(dòng)詞分為兩類：典型兼賓動(dòng)詞和非典型兼賓動(dòng)詞；本文認(rèn)為“謂賓動(dòng)詞”的實(shí)質(zhì)就是兩個(gè)事態(tài)之間的連接問題。
[Abstract]:On the basis of a comprehensive investigation of all kinds of predicate verbs and their predicate objects, this paper makes a comparison with the similar phenomena in other languages in the world. This paper tries to find out the common and individual characteristics of Chinese predicate verbs, and then deepen the study of Chinese predicate verbs. First of all, guided by the categorization theory of cognitive linguistics, this paper reviews the study of predicate verbs in typology. Find out the common features and individual differences of predicate verbs in the world language: the common feature is that the predicate objects after predicate verbs can be divided into three types from the structural types, namely, verb phrases, incomplete clauses and complete clauses; Personality difference is that the predicate object of the same type of predicate verb can not be completely consistent in structure type. Secondly, according to the structural nature of the predicate verb, this paper divides the predicate verb into five categories: the predicate verb that can only drive the object of part of speech, the predicate verb that can only bring the object of the part of speech, and the predicate verb that can only bring the object of the part of speech. The predicate and object verbs with only clause objects, the predicate and object verbs with part of speech objects and concurrent objects and the predicate object verbs with part of speech objects and clause objects, and the predicate and object verbs with only part of speech objects, The predicate object verbs with only concurrent objects and the predicate object verbs with only clauses are investigated in detail, and according to the referential degree of the subsequent objects or whether the object and the verb have causative meaning or whether the object can be independently formed into a sentence, The three kinds of verbs are further classified in lower order. Finally, from the perspective of contrast between English, Korean and Chinese, this paper discusses the similarities and differences of predicate object verbs in the three languages, and also discusses the phenomenon that some predicate and object verbs in Chinese can only have the formal objects of interrogative sentences. At the end of the article, the author puts forward his own opinion on the positivity and negativity of predicate verb. Compared with the previous studies, the main innovations of this paper are as follows: summing up the object brought by predicate verbs in the world language can be divided into three categories: verb phrases, incomplete clauses and complete clauses; It is clearly pointed out that the Chinese predicate verb can be divided into three categories according to its referential degree: specific event referential, class event referential and materialized event referential. From the angle of lexical meaning and structural meaning, this paper divides the verb of compound object into two categories: the verb of typical and the verb of object, and the essence of the verb of predicate and object is the connection between the two states of affairs.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 谷建輝;單曉梅;;疑問語氣還是非疑問語氣——用“把”字句探討真謂賓動(dòng)詞帶疑問句形式賓語的語氣問題[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2010年03期

2 郭鳳花;說甲骨文中的謂賓動(dòng)詞“有”[J];大理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

3 張學(xué)會(huì);;淺析動(dòng)詞作賓語的謂賓動(dòng)詞[J];大慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

4 李咸菊;;“名動(dòng)詞”之語法功能及詞類地位探討[J];湖南工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

5 吳錫根;動(dòng)詞對(duì)賓語的句法選擇和語用選擇[J];杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1996年04期

6 劉大為;言語行為與言說動(dòng)詞句[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1991年06期

7 朱斌;真準(zhǔn)謂賓動(dòng)詞[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1998年06期

8 王麗彩;;現(xiàn)代漢語謂賓動(dòng)詞及相關(guān)問題研究[J];暨南大學(xué)華文學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

9 亢世勇;現(xiàn)代漢語謂賓動(dòng)詞分類統(tǒng)計(jì)研究[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1998年01期

10 麻彩霞;論現(xiàn)代漢語非名賓動(dòng)詞[J];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 牛順心;漢語中致使范疇的結(jié)構(gòu)類型研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2004年

2 劉輝;現(xiàn)代漢語事件量詞的語義和句法[D];上海師范大學(xué);2009年

3 吳懷成;現(xiàn)代漢語動(dòng)詞指稱化的層級(jí)分布及其類型學(xué)思考[D];上海師范大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 崔少娟;現(xiàn)代漢語謂賓動(dòng)詞研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2011年

本文編號(hào)：1909285