發(fā)布時間：2018-04-21 22:49

  本文選題：《禮部韻略》 + 多音字��； 參考：《武漢大學(xué)》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：《禮部韻略》作為專為科舉而設(shè)的官韻,具有簡潔、實用、權(quán)威的特點,其多音字只取經(jīng)典中常見、舉子常用音義項。我們從《禮部韻略》中具有代表性的多音字的角度出發(fā),分析其音義特點,并結(jié)合宋代科舉詩賦中相應(yīng)的用韻實例,觀察科舉實踐中是否嚴(yán)格按照《禮部韻略》的規(guī)定來押用,考察《禮部韻略》規(guī)定與科舉執(zhí)行之間的關(guān)系,分析《禮部韻略》不合理之處以及考生是如何面對的,探討科場糾紛中考官和舉子判定詩賦落韻與否的依據(jù),進(jìn)一步探討《禮部韻略》規(guī)定的“出處”與“泛押”在詩賦押韻中實際運用情況,分析經(jīng)典音在科舉中的重要地位,更深入地探討《禮部韻略》與科舉的相互影響的辯證關(guān)系。 我們按照以下幾個部分來進(jìn)行研究：緒論部分主要說研究價值、研究概況以及本文思路、研究目的、方法、重難點和創(chuàng)新點等。第一章作為背景知識,簡單介紹《禮部韻略》的來源、與其他韻書的關(guān)系、版本及增訂情況。第二章主要介紹《禮部韻略》又音,對又音進(jìn)行分類分析,并在�？钡幕A(chǔ)上探討又音的來源。第三章主要梳理宋代科舉的考試內(nèi)容、科舉詩賦目錄,分析其用韻禁忌,為后文詩賦引用、分析服務(wù)。第四章在二、三章的基礎(chǔ)上,以科舉詩賦中常用多音字韻字為個案,分析《禮部韻略》多音字的音義關(guān)系、來源,列舉并分析宋代科舉中實際押用情況以及科舉中相關(guān)爭訟案例,并輔以大量日常律賦用韻來參證,以此來探討規(guī)定與執(zhí)行之間的關(guān)系。第五章對《禮韻》和科舉的關(guān)系進(jìn)一步梳理、歸納,從《禮部韻略》、學(xué)者、考生三方來探討二者的互動關(guān)系；以前文個案分析為基礎(chǔ),從學(xué)理來探討《禮部韻略》規(guī)定的合理與不合理之處,并探討在《禮部韻略》與時音有差距的前提下,考生卻能精熟運用《禮部韻略》的原因；在個案分析的基礎(chǔ)上,詳細(xì)探討、總結(jié)多音字押用中的“出處”和“泛押”問題,指出經(jīng)典音與科舉有著重要關(guān)系。 最后總結(jié)前文所作的研究,得出一些重要的結(jié)論：第一,《禮部韻略》在束縛舉子們用韻的同時,又受到科舉中舉子的一些有爭議的用韻的檢驗、沖擊,促使官方對《禮部韻略》做出一些補(bǔ)充、調(diào)整等舉措,二者是互相影響的關(guān)系。第二,《禮部韻略》規(guī)定亦有不合理之處,如常用音義項缺收、誤注、部分韻字音義項規(guī)定不完備等。第三,《禮部韻略》明確規(guī)定了音義的匹配關(guān)系,科場押用中基本上是按照其規(guī)定來押用的,音義匹配相符合,但亦有違背《禮部韻略》規(guī)定而未被黜落的情況發(fā)生。第四,舉子、考官對《禮部韻略》規(guī)定理解的不同會造成用韻上的分歧,舉子亦會利用《禮部韻略》的不完備之處作為擋箭牌為自己開脫。第五,《禮部韻略》規(guī)定的出處與泛押,舉子、考官并非嚴(yán)格遵從,偶爾會有處理從寬的跡象,帶有一定的主觀性因素。第六,考場遇到《禮部韻略》規(guī)定不明或規(guī)定未涉及到之類情況的時候,通常以經(jīng)典音為準(zhǔn),偶爾亦會參考《集韻》。
[Abstract]:As an official rhyme for imperial examination, Rite rhyme has the characteristics of simplicity, practicality and authority. Its multi-syllable characters are only common in the classics. From the point of view of the representative multi-syllable characters in Rite rhyme, we analyze its phonetic characteristics, and combine with the corresponding examples of rhyme in the Song Dynasty imperial examination poetry and Fu, and observe whether the imperial examination practice is strictly applied in accordance with the regulations of Rite Rhyme. This paper investigates the relationship between the regulations of Rite rhyme and the execution of imperial examination, analyzes on the irrationality of Rite rhyme and how the examinee faces it, and probes into the basis for examiners and Huizi to judge the rhyme of poetry and Fu in the dispute of science field. This paper further discusses the actual application of "provenance" and "Pan-remold" in the rhyme of poetry and Fu, analyzes the important position of classical sound in the imperial examination, and probes into the dialectical relationship between "Rite rhyme" and the imperial examination in depth. We carry on the research according to the following several parts: the introduction part mainly says the research value, the research survey as well as this article thought, the research goal, the method, the heavy difficulty and the innovation point and so on. The first chapter, as background knowledge, briefly introduces the origin of Rite rhyme, the relationship with other rhyme books, the edition and the update. The second chapter mainly introduces the Rite rhyme, and analyzes the Rhyme by classification, and discusses the origin of it on the basis of collation. The third chapter mainly combs the Song Dynasty imperial examination examination content, imperial examination poetry and Fu catalogue, analyzes its use rhyme taboo, for the later text poetry Fu citation, the analysis service. On the basis of the second and third chapters, the fourth chapter analyzes the phonetic relationship and origin of the polysyllabic characters, which are commonly used in the imperial examination poetry and Fu, as a case study. This paper enumerates and analyzes the actual usage of imperial examinations in the Song Dynasty and the relevant contentious cases in the imperial examinations, and uses a large number of daily laws and rhymes to refer to the evidence in order to explore the relationship between the regulations and the execution. The fifth chapter further combs the relationship between Rite rhyme and imperial examination, concludes, from "Rite rhyme", scholars, examinees to explore the interaction between the two; the previous text case analysis as the basis, This paper probes into the reasonableness and unreasonableness of the rules of Rite rhyme from the viewpoint of theory, and discusses the reasons why the examinee can use Rite rhyme well on the premise of the difference between Rite Rhyme and time, and on the basis of case analysis, This paper discusses in detail the problems of "provenance" and "universal deposit" in the use of polysyllabic characters, and points out that the classical pronunciation has an important relationship with the imperial examination. Finally, after summarizing the previous research, some important conclusions are drawn: first, "Rite rhyme" is not only bound to the rhyme of lifting children, but also subject to the examination and impact of some controversial rhyme in the imperial examination. To promote the official to the Rite rhyme to make some additions, adjustments and other measures, the two are the relationship of mutual influence. Second, the rules of Rite Rhyme also have some unreasonable points, such as the missing of common phonetic items, incorrect notes, incomplete provisions of partial rhyme and phonetic meanings, and so on. Thirdly, Rite rhyme clearly defines the matching relation of phonetic meaning, which is basically applied in accordance with its provisions, and the matching of phonetic meaning is consistent, but there are also some cases of undeposed fall in violation of the rules of Rite rhyme. Fourth, the examiner's different understanding of Rite rhyme rules will lead to differences in rhyme, and he will use the incompleteness of Rite Rhyme as a shield to excuse himself. Fifthly, the provenance of "Rite Rhyme" is not strictly obeyed by examiners, and occasionally there are signs of leniency, with certain subjective factors. Sixthly, when the rules of "ritual rhyme" are unclear or the regulations are not involved in the examination room, they usually refer to the classical sound, and occasionally refer to the "collection rhyme".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H113

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李子君;北京圖書館藏《附釋文互注禮部韻略》刊印年代考[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

2 張希清;論宋代科舉取士之多與冗官問題[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1987年05期

3 李紅;;宋代科舉制度與韻書發(fā)展[J];北方論叢;2010年01期

4 李子君;;科舉與音韻──明代音韻學(xué)繁榮的原因[J];長春大學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年11期

5 李子君;;《禮部韻略》在宋代語言學(xué)史上的功用[J];辭書研究;2006年04期

6 張光宇;東南方言關(guān)系綜論[J];方言;1999年01期

7 劉曉南;朱熹與閩方言[J];方言;2001年01期

8 馮蒸;中古果假二攝合流性質(zhì)考略[J];古漢語研究;1989年04期

9 水谷誠,張麗娟;關(guān)于真福寺本《禮部韻略》[J];古漢語研究;2000年04期

10 劉曉南;宋代文士用韻與宋代通語及方言[J];古漢語研究;2001年01期

，

本文編號：1784457