本文選題：主觀化 + 句法限制　； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文主要研究語(yǔ)言中句法限制被消解現(xiàn)象的兩個(gè)方面：句法層面上許多原本不可接受或不自足的語(yǔ)法結(jié)構(gòu),因?yàn)榧尤胍恍┲饔^性的成分,句子的可接受度大大增強(qiáng)；在語(yǔ)言演變的過(guò)程中,一些構(gòu)式意義主觀性增強(qiáng)后,句法功能發(fā)生轉(zhuǎn)換。 關(guān)于意義主觀化后句法限制得到消解的現(xiàn)象,國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)術(shù)界的研究還比較零散。主要集中在四個(gè)方面：主觀化與識(shí)解圖式的變化,主觀化與詞序的選擇,主觀化與長(zhǎng)距離反身代詞化以及主觀化與句法功能的擴(kuò)展。這些研究成功地展示了主觀化理論對(duì)句法現(xiàn)象的解釋力,但研究還不夠深入,同時(shí)也存在許多問(wèn)題和不足。 本文主要運(yùn)用主觀化理論,對(duì)主觀性因素進(jìn)入語(yǔ)言的方式,這些語(yǔ)言形式對(duì)說(shuō)話人的視角,情感和認(rèn)識(shí)的表達(dá),以及意義主觀化與句法限制被消解二者的關(guān)系、消解的過(guò)程進(jìn)行闡述。意義主觀化是指語(yǔ)言為了表達(dá)說(shuō)話人的情感、態(tài)度和認(rèn)識(shí)等主觀性因素而采取相應(yīng)結(jié)構(gòu),對(duì)語(yǔ)言進(jìn)行編碼的過(guò)程。從認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的角度來(lái)說(shuō),主觀性和主觀化在分析語(yǔ)義創(chuàng)造性和識(shí)解方面發(fā)揮著重要作用。 本研究得到如下認(rèn)識(shí)：語(yǔ)言表現(xiàn)主觀性的方式包括時(shí)體標(biāo)記、情態(tài)動(dòng)詞、副詞、語(yǔ)氣詞、數(shù)量結(jié)構(gòu)、情態(tài)成分等,這些方式反映了說(shuō)話人的態(tài)度、視角和情感；句子主觀化以后,不再是對(duì)單純命題意義的表達(dá),轉(zhuǎn)而表達(dá)說(shuō)話人對(duì)該事件的評(píng)價(jià)、認(rèn)識(shí)、或判斷,句法功能抽象化、語(yǔ)用化,主觀化的結(jié)果是使句子獲得了語(yǔ)篇和元語(yǔ)言功能,句子的可接受度提高；構(gòu)式意義主觀化后,原有的句法形態(tài)、選擇限制消失,從而使句法功能得到轉(zhuǎn)換。 本文通過(guò)對(duì)句法限制被消解現(xiàn)象的系統(tǒng)研究,表明主觀化理論能為句子可接受度的提高和句法功能的擴(kuò)展等問(wèn)題提供較為合理的解釋。一方面有助于從一個(gè)新的視角加深對(duì)相關(guān)語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象的共性認(rèn)識(shí)；另一方面,對(duì)運(yùn)用主觀化理論解釋英漢語(yǔ)句法問(wèn)題也具有一定的參考價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on two aspects of the deconstruction of syntactic restrictions in language: at the syntactic level, many grammatical structures that are not acceptable or self-sufficient are introduced, because of the addition of some subjective elements, the acceptability of sentences is greatly enhanced; In the process of language evolution, the syntactic function changes after the subjectivity of some construction meanings is enhanced. As to the phenomenon that the syntactic restriction has been dispelled after the subjectivization of meaning, the research in academic circles at home and abroad is still scattered. It mainly focuses on four aspects: the change of subjective and decipherable schemata, the choice of subjectivization and word order, the subjectivization and long distance reflexive pronoun, and the subjectivization and the expansion of syntactic function. These studies have successfully demonstrated the explanatory power of the subjective theory on syntactic phenomena, but the research is not deep enough, and there are many problems and deficiencies at the same time. This paper mainly applies the theory of subjectivity to the way that subjective factors enter into language, the expression of these linguistic forms to the speaker's perspective, emotion and cognition, as well as the relationship between the subjective meaning and the elimination of syntactic restriction. The process of digestion is described. Meaning subjectivization refers to the process of language coding by adopting the corresponding structure to express the subjective factors such as emotion attitude and cognition of the speaker. From the perspective of cognitive linguistics, subjectivity and subjectivity play an important role in the analysis of semantic creativity and understanding. The main findings of this study are as follows: the subjective ways of language expression include tense and aspect markers, modal verbs, adverbs, mood words, quantitative structures, modal elements, and so on, which reflect the attitude, perspective and emotion of the speaker; After the sentence is subjective, it is no longer the expression of the simple propositional meaning, but instead expresses the speaker's evaluation, cognition, judgment, syntactic function abstraction and pragmatics of the event. The result of the subjectivization is that the sentence obtains the functions of discourse and meta-language, and the acceptance of the sentence is improved. After the subjective construction, the original syntactic form, the choice restriction disappears, and the syntactic function is transformed. Based on the systematic study of the phenomenon that syntactic restriction is dispelled, this paper shows that the subjective theory can provide a more reasonable explanation for the improvement of sentence acceptability and the expansion of syntactic function. On the one hand, it helps to deepen the common understanding of the related linguistic phenomena from a new perspective; on the other hand, it has some reference value for the interpretation of English and Chinese sentence methods by using the subjective theory.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：H043

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王立和;副詞“不”的非否定用法[J];吉林師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1995年04期

2 張敏;從類型學(xué)和認(rèn)知語(yǔ)法的角度看漢語(yǔ)重疊現(xiàn)象[J];國(guó)外語(yǔ)言學(xué);1997年02期

3 鄧英樹,黃谷;論“不A不B”的否定意義及其制約因素[J];四川師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

4 吳吟;漢語(yǔ)重疊研究綜述[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2000年03期

5 殷志平;關(guān)于“一身冷汗”一類短語(yǔ)的性質(zhì)和特點(diǎn)[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2000年04期

6 項(xiàng)開喜;事物的突顯性與標(biāo)記詞“大”[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);1998年01期

7 謝瑛;新時(shí)期漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法AABB重疊式芻議[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);1998年01期

8 周明強(qiáng);論“好不AP”、“好AP”中的AP[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);1998年01期

9 沈清淮;名詞的AABB疊合[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);1998年03期

10 李宇明;“一V…數(shù)量”結(jié)構(gòu)及其主觀大量問(wèn)題[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);1999年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1779770