本文選題：留學(xué)生 + 句法��； 參考：《語言教學(xué)與研究》2013年02期

【摘要】：本文采用句法判斷和修改任務(wù),考察了不同漢語水平及不同國(guó)家留學(xué)生對(duì)狀語、定語和補(bǔ)語等不同句法錯(cuò)誤的認(rèn)知難度。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn):(1)學(xué)生的句法判斷和修改成績(jī)受到句法錯(cuò)誤類型的影響。狀語錯(cuò)誤的修改成績(jī)好于定語錯(cuò)誤,定語錯(cuò)誤修改成績(jī)好于補(bǔ)語錯(cuò)誤;初、中級(jí)學(xué)生成績(jī)的差異主要表現(xiàn)在定語和補(bǔ)語錯(cuò)誤的判斷上。(2)學(xué)生錯(cuò)誤判斷的成績(jī)好于錯(cuò)誤修改成績(jī)。(3)馬來西亞學(xué)生狀語和定語修改成績(jī)沒有差異,明顯好于補(bǔ)語成績(jī);而韓國(guó)學(xué)生則呈現(xiàn)出明顯的階梯性變化的趨勢(shì),狀語修改成績(jī)好于定語修改成績(jī),而定語修改成績(jī)又好于補(bǔ)語成績(jī)。不同國(guó)家的學(xué)生既表現(xiàn)了學(xué)習(xí)的共性也表現(xiàn)了各自的特性。
[Abstract]:Using the task of syntactic judgment and modification, this paper investigates the cognitive difficulties of different syntactic errors such as adverbials, attributives and complements among foreign students from different countries and different levels of Chinese.It was found that the syntactic judgment and revision scores of the students were influenced by the types of syntactic errors.The correction of adverbial errors is better than that of attributive errors, and the modification of attributive errors is better than that of complement errors.The difference of middle level students' scores mainly shows in the judgment of attributive and complement errors. 2) the students' wrong judgment results are better than that of wrong revision scores. 3) there is no difference in the scores of adverbial and attributive modification of Malaysian students, which is obviously better than that of complement.The Korean students showed an obvious trend of ladder change, the adverbial revision score was better than the attributive revision score, and the attributive revision score was better than the complement score.Students from different countries not only show the commonness of learning, but also show their own characteristics.
【作者單位】： 北京外國(guó)語大學(xué)中國(guó)語言文學(xué)學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：H195

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 馬黎華;;語言標(biāo)記性研究的回顧與思考[J];浙江海洋學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2010年03期

2 施家煒;;外國(guó)留學(xué)生22類現(xiàn)代漢語句式的習(xí)得順序研究[J];世界漢語教學(xué);1998年04期

3 肖奚強(qiáng);;韓國(guó)學(xué)生漢語語法偏誤分析[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2000年02期

4 周小兵;;學(xué)習(xí)難度的測(cè)定和考察[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2004年01期

5 周小兵;;非母語者漢語語法偏誤研究程序[J];云南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(對(duì)外漢語教學(xué)與研究版);2009年01期

6 劉s，

本文編號(hào)：1746462