本文選題：段玉裁　切入點：《說文解字注》　出處：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文主要以《說文解字注》中引《孟子》作為材料，來研究段玉裁對《孟子》的研究。再根據(jù)趙岐的《孟子章句》和朱熹的《四書章句集注》中對《孟子》的解釋來判定段氏的論斷，并找出歷代文獻(xiàn)材料中也運用這一用法，采用這一方法的例子，作為文獻(xiàn)佐證，以期對段玉裁的《孟子》研究進(jìn)行全面的梳理探究。 本文主要采用統(tǒng)計法、列舉法和比較法。將《說文解字注》中引《孟子》材料做了窮盡式的整理，共找出241處。把段氏的注釋與歷代《孟子》研究學(xué)者的注釋進(jìn)行列舉比較，以此來展示語言的發(fā)展脈絡(luò)。 本文主要分三個部分。第一部分是緒論，，主要對本文研究的目的、方法和意義進(jìn)行闡述。第二部分是段氏《孟子》的訓(xùn)詁成就，通過因聲求義、辨析字形、辨析字義三種方式來闡發(fā)段玉裁對《孟子》研究的訓(xùn)詁成就。第三部分是段氏《孟子》的不足，這里主要是就音韻學(xué)方面的不足予以列舉，并明確原因。 本文的核心部分是論文的第二部分，通過聲訓(xùn)、形訓(xùn)、義訓(xùn)三個角度對段注引《孟子》的訓(xùn)詁方法進(jìn)行闡釋。聲訓(xùn)分為同音字，聲母相同考查韻部關(guān)系，韻部相同考查聲母關(guān)系三個方面。形訓(xùn)分為古今字、異體字、假借字三個角度，對字形和字源進(jìn)行探究。義訓(xùn)從引申義、俗語、義界、互訓(xùn)、比較、描述五個方面來解析段注引《孟子》材料，并一一分析，此處采用的是哪一種義訓(xùn)方法，并配以歷史材料佐證。 關(guān)于經(jīng)籍的研究一般是分為兩個方面：一是專門對經(jīng)籍本身進(jìn)行注釋闡發(fā)；另外一種是把經(jīng)籍作為材料進(jìn)行釋義研究，這實際上也等于是對經(jīng)籍的進(jìn)行注釋。例如對于《孟子》的研究就是這樣，有對《孟子》書本身的訓(xùn)詁、考證、文風(fēng)等方面的研究，還有一種是諸如在段玉裁《說文解字注》中將《孟子》作為材料引出，這實際上也是對《孟子》的注釋研究�？v觀各個歷史時期的《孟子》研究，對其注釋闡發(fā)的書籍很多，但把《孟子》作為材料，來考察《段注》對其研究的書籍甚少。本文力主于這一方面的研究，從全新的角度來研究對《孟子》的注釋。
[Abstract]:In this paper, Mencius is cited as the material in Shuowen Jie Zi Note. To study Duan Yu-cai 's study of Mencius. Then, according to the interpretation of Mencius in Zhao Qi's Mencius sentence and Zhu Xi's interpretation of Mencius, and to find out that this usage is also used in the literature and materials of the past dynasties, An example of this method is used as evidence in the literature in order to make a comprehensive research on Mencius by Duan Yucai. In this paper, the statistical method, enumeration method and comparative method are mainly used. The materials cited from Mencius in Shuowen Jie Zi Note are arranged in an exhaustive manner, and 241 places are found out. The comments of Duan's are compared with those of the scholars of Mencius in the past dynasties. To show the development of language. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is the introduction, which mainly expounds the purpose, method and significance of this study. The second part is the achievement of the exegesis of Duan's Mencius. The third part is the deficiency of Duan's Mencius. The core part of this paper is the second part of the thesis, which explains the exegesis method of "Mencius" from the three angles of sound training, form training and righteousness training. The prosodic part examines the consonant relationship in three aspects. The form training is divided into ancient and modern characters, variant characters and false borrowing characters, to probe into the font and the source of the characters. The meaning and training are compared from the exhortation of the meaning, the common saying, the semantic boundary, the mutual training, and the comparison. This paper describes five aspects to explain the material cited by Mencius, and analyzes it one by one, which method is used here, and is supported by historical materials. There are generally two aspects to the study of Confucian classics: one is to annotate and expound the classics itself; the other is to study the interpretation of the classics as materials. In fact, this is also tantamount to annotating the classics. For example, this is the case with the study of Mencius. There are studies on the exegesis, textual research, literary style, and so on in the book of Mencius. There is another one, such as the introduction of Mencius as a material in Duan Yu-cai 's "Shuo Wen Jie Zi Notes", which is actually also a study of the annotation of "Mencius". Throughout all historical periods, Mencius has been studied and interpreted in many books. However, there are very few books on Mencius to investigate the study of Mencius. This paper is devoted to the study of Mencius from a new perspective.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：H131

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王繼洪;異體字與漢字學(xué)研究[J];上海大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1999年04期

本文編號：1644420