發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-26 17:31

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 隱喻性手勢(shì) 架構(gòu) 總統(tǒng)演講　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文以概念隱喻和架構(gòu)理論為理論基礎(chǔ),以2012年美國(guó)總統(tǒng)大選的辯論演講視頻為語(yǔ)料,分析了兩位候選人——奧巴馬與羅姆尼在演講辯論中所使用的隱喻性手勢(shì)。從概念隱喻的角度分析了隱喻性手勢(shì)的類(lèi)型,從架構(gòu)理論的視角分析了隱喻性手勢(shì)所蘊(yùn)涵的民主黨與共和黨不同的意識(shí)形態(tài)。 通過(guò)數(shù)據(jù)收集、對(duì)比及分析,本文結(jié)論如下： 一、與傳統(tǒng)隱喻分類(lèi)一樣,演講中的隱喻性手勢(shì)也同樣有對(duì)應(yīng)的類(lèi)型,比如：上／下,前／后,中心既是重要,重要既是點(diǎn),以及明白即是看見(jiàn)。 當(dāng)人們談?wù)撃承⿴в须[喻意義的單詞與句子的同時(shí),他們也會(huì)下意識(shí)地做出相對(duì)應(yīng)的隱喻性手勢(shì)。因?yàn)檠哉Z(yǔ)系統(tǒng)與身體都是由人類(lèi)大腦控制的。 二、盡管手勢(shì)與言語(yǔ)系統(tǒng)一樣與大腦相連,它們與言語(yǔ)表達(dá)卻未必同步。隱喻性手勢(shì)比語(yǔ)言更可信、更快,所以我們有時(shí)會(huì)在演講中看見(jiàn)一些與言語(yǔ)不匹配的手勢(shì),然而這些不匹配的手勢(shì)卻能幫助我們更好地理解說(shuō)話者的真實(shí)意圖。 三、隱喻性手勢(shì)明確地體現(xiàn)了架構(gòu)。本文主要比較了代表民主黨的奧巴馬以及代表共和黨的羅姆尼的架構(gòu)。通過(guò)數(shù)據(jù)收集和分析,本文得出以下結(jié)論：奧巴馬做了許多暗含民主黨“大政府”架構(gòu)的手勢(shì)：像控制某物那樣將手彎曲,正如把某些東西握在手里一樣；然而羅姆尼做了許多暗含共和黨“小政府”架構(gòu)的手勢(shì)：比如食指指向的手勢(shì),意味著其傾向于維護(hù)個(gè)人的權(quán)利與自由。除此之外,在職者——奧巴馬更傾向于做許多“向前”架構(gòu)的手勢(shì)：把手向前伸；挑戰(zhàn)者——羅姆尼更傾向于做許多“改變”架構(gòu)的手勢(shì),比如質(zhì)疑和譴責(zé)的手勢(shì)。 兩位候選人的演講的隱喻性手勢(shì)中各自體現(xiàn)了民主黨推崇的“大政府”與共和黨推崇的“小政府”,也體現(xiàn)了在任者(奧巴馬)“向前”以及挑戰(zhàn)者(羅姆尼)“改變”的架構(gòu)。 本文不僅促進(jìn)了隱喻的研究,同時(shí)也豐富了隱喻性手勢(shì)的理論。除此之外,本文可進(jìn)一步推動(dòng)隱喻在心理語(yǔ)言學(xué)與神經(jīng)語(yǔ)言學(xué)中的應(yīng)用。
[Abstract]:Based on the conceptual metaphor and the theory of architecture, this paper uses the video of the debate on the 2012 presidential election in the United States as the corpus. This paper analyzes the metaphorical gestures used by two candidates, Obama and Romney, in the speech debate, and analyzes the types of metaphorical gestures from the perspective of conceptual metaphor. This paper analyzes the different ideologies of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party implied by metaphorical gestures from the perspective of framework theory. Through data collection, comparison and analysis, this paper concludes as follows:. First, the metaphorical gestures in speech have the same corresponding types as the traditional metaphorical classification. For example, the center is both important, important and visible. When people talk about some metaphorical words and sentences, they also make corresponding metaphorical gestures subconsciously, because both the speech system and the body are controlled by the human brain. Second, although gestures are as connected to the brain as the speech system, they do not necessarily synchronize with speech expression. Metaphorical gestures are more credible and faster than language, so we sometimes see gestures that don't match words in our speeches. However, these mismatched gestures can help us to better understand the real intentions of the speaker. Thirdly, metaphorical gestures clearly reflect the structure. This paper mainly compares the structure of Obama, who represents the Democratic Party, and Romney, who represents the Republican Party, through data collection and analysis. The following conclusions are drawn: Obama has made many gestures implying a Democratic "big government" structure: bend his hands as if he were controlling something, just as he holds something in his hand; Yet Romney has made many gestures implying a Republican "small government" structure: for example, the pointing of the index finger, which means he is inclined to defend the rights and freedoms of the individual. Incumbents-Obama is more likely to make a lot of "forward" gestures: hands forward; challenger Mitt Romney is more likely to make many "change" gestures, such as questioning and denouncing. The metaphorical gestures of the two candidates' speeches reflect the Democratic "big government" and the Republican "small government", as well as the "forward" structure of the incumbent (Obama) and the challenger (Romney) "change." This paper not only promotes the study of metaphor, but also enriches the theory of metaphorical gestures. In addition, it can further promote the application of metaphor in psycholinguistics and neurolinguistics.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H026.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 樂(lè)眉云;手勢(shì)新論──麥克尼爾的手勢(shì)語(yǔ)言辯證觀[J];外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));1999年06期

2 楊曉瓊;;手勢(shì)語(yǔ)言觀——手勢(shì)研究的新視角[J];宜春學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1539040